pedophiles going public

I'm no fan of Catholics but, to be fair, I don't think Catholics are acting in accordance with their ideology when doing this. Progressives, on the other hand, seem to be operating under a few progressive ideas. 1) If it feels good, do it, and 2) sexual norms are to be pushed further and further as time goes on.

 

https://heatst.com/politics/militant-antifa-activists-have-deep-ties-to-notorious-nambla-pedophiles/

 

First, paedophilia is absolutely not genetic (born this way), and absolutely not biological. It's a corruption which happens in childhood, most often as a result of having been victims themselves. When there is no history of abuse, there will be something else - obviously. Some very dodgy parenting, at the very least.

Secondly, anyone who thinks Progressives are not aligned at the tip of the iceberg is a fool. There is a Social Marxist now languishing in prison (for paedophilia) in Canada, who was the originator of the "Safe Schools" program. The cunningly named LGBT Indoctrination course disguised as an anti-bullying program, now implemented in public schools around the world. In one country which shall remain nameless, the woman primarily responsible for adapting his course and seeing it rolled out, is an openly Marxist lesbian who dresses and looks like a man. Her offsider - the man responsible for implementing the courses within schools, is a gay man who allegedly hates kids, calls straight people 'breeders', and has an apartment full of pornographic photos of young men. Yep, working in schools.

 

If they don't act on it, no one is concerned about them. If they don't act on it, NO ONE WILL KNOW THEY ARE PEDOPHILES. For someone who figures to be pretty smart...

 

It can be argued that Catholic Clergy act because of their conservative ideology,
1. Sexual Repression 2. enforced celibacy.

 

You can read about prominent jews who support/advocate pedophilia in the following post:

Jewish doctor is pushing for sex-change treatment for children

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...nt-for-children.464682/page-4#post-1066549321

And in the following thread you can read about how the media support a well-known "LGBT" / child-sex advocate:

Anti-Russian "LGBT" activist defends child-sex, has the support of the jewish media

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...x-has-the-support-of-the-jewish-media.481134/

 

I never thought I'd see gay marriage or gay adoption, the former I don't care about much but the adoption thing is state sanctioned child abuse. Then there's the perverts in the ladies room thing and the silly gender debate. Pedophilia is an illness and a crime but groups like NAMBLA would like you to believe it's a lifestyle and just a preference. It's a short walk for them to start demanding their rights.If the left were ever to prevail in this area pedophiles would become a protected group.We no doubt will be hearing from the social justice nuts before long.

 

Why can't it be an illness and a crime? Are they mutually exclusive?

Alcoholism is an illness, but if you drive drunk and kill someone it's a crime.

Where am I going wrong?

 

What is this garbage you are spewing? You read some nutty blog?

Get a grip.

 

I saw it coming like 20 years ago, when I realized that apologists for pedophilia had something very basic in common with apologists for homosexuality: a belief, professed or otherwise, in subjective morality - which of course is in fact no morality at all.

What the hell for?

As if I didn't know.

 

You sure as hell should...

...because that's what enables the construction of a positive perception shell around such abuse.

 

This about Catholic priests???

 

Morality is subjective. If it wasn't, Christians would still be selling their daughters to rapists.

 

Well is sure isn't Islam.

Pedophilia is already legal under the Qur'an.

Islam was founded on pedophilia by the Prophet Muhammad and his perverted companions so they could poke little 7 year old girls and boys.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia

 

The guilty always make way too much noise about the things they're guilty of.

 

'folks'? 'mutants'!

 

Who has demanded they should have a right to molest children and what high-profile liberals support this?

 

That's about right. They don't call out the clergy for doing this at.all.

 

Lol...Why not? Trump publicly brags about his sexual assaults, and you people get leg tingles.
Trump has ushered in a new age of degeneracy in the US.
You will see an increase in sexual assaults, tax evasion, adultery and hysterical bigotry as his supporters ape his antics and use him as an excuse for their perversions and criminality.

 

If they were obeying those "conservative" values they wouldn't be molesting children, would they? They do this in defiance of those beliefs, whereas progressives are acting in accordance with theirs.

 

Exhibit A of what, your lack of reading comprehension? Sorry buddy, I didn't condone pedophiles. Attraction is biological. I even stated they should not act on it.

I'm attracted to women, that doesn't mean I can go out and rape one. Same with pedophiles. Doesn't change the fact people can't control what they are attracted to.

I know, if its not simple this or that, its above a right wingers head

 

Your source is not credible!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/heat-street/

Note that this criticism of a poorly chosen source is not support for pedophiles.

Instead it is an exposure of the OP's failure to establish the veracity of the source prior to starting this thread.

Using NAMBLA to tarnish the left has been going on for as long as I can recall. Tenuous and often completely bogus "links" are suggested and that fires up the religious right and the emoting begins.

Anyone who dares to criticize the source is tarred and feathered as a "pedophile supporter" by the gullible inflamed by these spurious allegations.

Needless to say that is going to be the response to this post and I can anticipate exactly what those responses will contain and who will be making them they are that PREDICTABLE.

But not one of those responses will address the FACT that the source for this thread has zero credibility!

Why would they question something that feeds their prejudices and confirmation biases just because it has no credibility?

Because it is easier to swallow the canards and feel good about themselves than to address the legitimacy of what they are doing.

In that respect they are no different than those they seek to condemn!

It is a mob mentality with no thought given to the actual harm they might be doing themselves and their own causes.

Ironic when you think about it.

Disclaimer: Like most people I am opposed to pedophiles and pedophilia primarily for the needless harm it causes to children. But I openminded enough to allow the discussion to take place. If pedophiles cannot openly express themselves without condemnation then they will do so in secret and that means we don't find out about it until after the damage is done. Better to know in advance and try to do something about the problem, even just talking about it, rather than allowing it to go on damaging children. This is a discussion that needs to take place on an adult to adult level. The emotions need to be left at the door and the problem acknowledged and treated. To do any less is to betray the trust of our children. Think about it.

 

You aren't wrong at all, in fact you are on the right track!

There is no "cure" for alcoholism. The only viable treatment is abstention usually with the aid of support groups.

Apply the same to pedophilia. No cure but treat with abstention and aid from support groups.

 

The extremist alt right does not practice what they preach!

 

Oh did this strike a nerve?