People died from mRNA shots...results from autopsies in Germany

Discussion in 'Coronavirus (COVID-19) News' started by Eleuthera, Dec 13, 2022.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Peope will never admit that they are unqualified to try and analyze these reports (or even analyze others analysis) because the have no training, education or experience in the subject.
     
    Quantum Nerd likes this.
  2. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    32,346
    Likes Received:
    29,992
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps you can actually show a study that validates this assertion. We can wait. Can you explain why the myocarditis examined in the study didn't require having had COVID?
     
    gfm7175 and Navy Corpsman like this.
  3. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I can't explain it. I've seen a number of responses to the study, from actual doctors, who cite that the lack of a control group is a serious flaw in the study you are pointing to.
     
  4. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970

    Conclusions:
    Overall, the risk of myocarditis is greater after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination
     
    Quantum Nerd and LiveUninhibited like this.
  5. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,543
    Likes Received:
    5,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No sources other than official mainstream propaganda outlets can be allowed, all others must be ridiculed and dismissed? The propagandists are delighted at this practice. I am amazed that how much ad-hom "attack the source" fallacy is going on here. If the claim made in the OP is BS, it should be easy for them to debunk the claim instead of resort to "attack the source" ad hom fallacies.
     
    Navy Corpsman, JET3534 and gfm7175 like this.
  6. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And I did exactly that.
     
  7. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,462
    Likes Received:
    4,801
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Listen, I did not graduate high school, but I do watch a lot of Fox news chat programs, and I can tell you that these vaccines are deadly......
     
    Quantum Nerd and Nwolfe35 like this.
  8. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    3,402
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Um yes. Myocarditis is caused by an immune reaction to viral proteins. The vaccine causes the production of (some) viral proteins, as does getting the virus.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022
  9. bobobrazil

    bobobrazil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2022
    Messages:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    893
    Trophy Points:
    113
    water is lethal in large amounts, oranges contain arsenic, all carbon based molecules are organic, no one cannot drink gasoline just because its organic
     
  10. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    3,402
    Trophy Points:
    113
    On a superficial read - maybe. Rarely you can get myocarditis, and rarely myocarditis may lead to a fatal arrythmia. Their autopsies don't really prove that, just raises the possibility. It's not actually that unusual to find no anatomic cause of death on autopsy. But the question isn't really whether the shot has ever caused a single death. We already knew it has. The question is if it's better to get the shot or get covid naturally. That requires a statistical analysis for how likely one is to die from one or the other. I found a comparison for delta in the past, which was very much in favor of getting the shot. Haven't done omicron, but my suspicion is it's still safer to get the shot.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022
  11. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    32,346
    Likes Received:
    29,992
    Trophy Points:
    113
  12. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    40,694
    Likes Received:
    15,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How much more?
     
  13. ricmortis

    ricmortis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    2,348
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True. But, if some medical experiments are conducted with no viable test for long term or risks involved, then we are really just lab rats that signed a waiver that we cannot sue in case we get injured or killed in this experiment.

    Even now, we are finding out that clinical trials by Big Pharma on these vaccinations withheld the injuries and deaths involved probably because the Left and Right were in a big rush to be hero in providing a supposed life saving vaccination. In addition, Big Pharma wanted to capitalize on max profits. The loser is the population being the vaccination truly did save lives by keeping some people out of the hospital, yet did not prevent deaths and the vaccination did absolutely nothing to prevent people catching nor transmitting the virus.

    Hence, it is not a vaccination, but a medical drug. I do figure that the amount of people adversely affected by the vax via injury or death is a great deal lower than those who died without getting the vax. So, government just banked on winning the percentages and hiding any test results from any who die as misinformation. We will never get to truly know the number of people who did get injured or died due to the vax since those with all the money (Big Pharma) and power (Government) won't want to be held liable at all costs. Hence, the massive marketing and fear campaign perpetrated to make the Sheep act like sheep.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022
  14. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    3,402
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The study isn't as clearly written as I would like, but it looks like these are the comparable percentages in bold: "Of the 42 842 345 people in the study population, 2861 (0.007%) were hospitalized or died from myocarditis during the study period; 345 (<0.001%) patients died within 28 days from a hospital admission with myocarditis or with myocarditis as cause of death recorded in the death certificate. A total of 617 (0.001%) of these events occurred 1 to 28 days after any dose of vaccine (Table 2). Of the 524 patients admitted to the hospital with myocarditis in the 1 to 28 days after any first or second vaccine dose, 151 (28.8%) had received a booster dose: 34.4% (79/230) of those who had ChAdOx1 in the first or second dose and 29.7% (72/243) of those who had BNT162b2 in the first or second dose (Table 2). Of the 5 934 153 patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection, 195 (0.003%) were hospitalized or died with myocarditis in the 1 to 28 days after the positive test; 114 (58.5%) of these events occurred before vaccination."

    So it's comparing 0.001% to 0.003%... I think... Very roughly, it looks like infection is about 3 times more likely to cause myocarditis... though respiratory problems are the more common issue.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022
    crank and Quantum Nerd like this.
  15. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    40,694
    Likes Received:
    15,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Outstanding post. I was asking facetiously but got a factual answer. Thanks for taking the time.
     
    Quantum Nerd likes this.
  16. ricmortis

    ricmortis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    2,348
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, what I see being Big Pharma and the Government was in such a massive rush to get a drug out there, they did a short term test of 1 month? Hmmm, in the past, the government forced Big Pharma to test vaccines for 5 to 10 years before releasing them to the public to ensure there are no true adverse affects. A month on a drug is most definitely not a test. Heck, even lab rat tests take longer.

    Before the vax, we never saw anyone faint and die on live air television. Now, we see it every month and people act like that is normal.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022
    gfm7175 likes this.
  17. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    3,402
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think the point of the 28 days in the analysis I quoted is that's the window in which myocarditis would be expected to occur if the exposure (vaccine, infection) was the cause of it. So if it occurred outside of that window, myocarditis is most likely caused by something else. Safety studies are continuously ongoing, really. The vaccine was rushed initially to minimize deaths from infection. As long as it's clear the vaccine causes far less death than expected infections, it's ethical.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022
  18. ricmortis

    ricmortis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    2,348
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think so. I would prefer an independent analysis. We cannot say for sure except people are dying at a greater rate soon after Covid injection in numbers than those without. We are seeing a greater deal of people fainting and dying on live tv than ever before in the last 30 years. The numbers are still small per capita by far than the risk of dying from Covid directly, regardless. But, to not conduct a thorough research and just write off that the vaccine may affect some people differently than others and that it is safe for everyone is true misinformation. There is most definitely proof that the vaccine has killed some people albeit the numbers may be 0.001%, but it has happened. A true scientist or doctor would try to figure out why.
     
    gfm7175 and James California like this.
  19. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    3,402
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure, investigation is good. But you had implied they should not have released the vaccine due to insufficient testing. I explained why they did. And again, the question isn't whether the vaccine can rarely kill, the question is if it is more likely to save the person than kill them. That's always the standard for medical interventions. If you get an appendectomy, there's a very small chance you can die due to the surgery, but the surgery is more likely to save you from sepsis due to perforated appendicitis.
     
    crank likes this.
  20. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    7,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You have something showing that?
     
  21. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    21,078
    Likes Received:
    11,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I started reviewing the list of "studies" posted en masse by one of our friendly vax-deniers. They all state that if you have myocarditis after a vax, it lasts for about a day and isn't dangerous.

    Good scientific sleuthing boys!
     
  22. James California

    James California Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    11,555
    Likes Received:
    11,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ~ The same is true of Co2 climate catastrophe, "Gender dysphoria" , non-binary nonsense. However "real" unbiased science is not part of government agenda.
     
    gfm7175, Navy Corpsman and JET3534 like this.
  23. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,543
    Likes Received:
    5,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know! Easy, right? Why do many posters here attack any source that is not an established mainstream propaganda outlet, instead of simply debunking the claim? Rhetorical, you can't be expected to speak for anyone other than yourself. But, it just amazes me.
     
    JET3534 likes this.
  24. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    30,742
    Likes Received:
    17,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Its not an ad, and it doesn't attack anything, it simply explains the claim in the propaganda rags are void of supportive fact, but of course that never bothered you anyway.

    If you want to believe the jab is dangerous, then don't take it. Who cares.
     
    fmw likes this.
  25. MuchAdo

    MuchAdo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2022
    Messages:
    2,041
    Likes Received:
    1,076
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The article in the OP is garbage. EpochTimes is well known for twisting and exaggerating research results.

    From the researchers who wrote the study. Their conclusions are as follows:


    Our study is limited by the relatively small cohort size and inherits the bias of an endpoint analysis. The nature of our autopsy study necessitates that the data are descriptive in quality and does not allow any epidemiological conclusions in terms of incidence or risk estimation. The reported incidence of (epi-)myocarditis after vaccination is low and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination [29]. Importantly, infectious agents may also cause lymphocytic myocarditis with a similar immunophenotype, thus meticulous molecular analyses is required in all cases of potentially vaccination-associated myocarditis.

    Regarding a potential auto-immunological mechanism explaining the myocardial damage, histological examination of lymphatic nodes might be of interest, as Röltgen et al. described altered germinal center architecture following COVID-19 vaccination [30]. This aspect could not be addressed in our analysis, as systematic lymph node sampling was not part of our standardized autopsy protocol.

    Finally, we cannot provide a definitive functional proof or a direct causal link between vaccination and myocarditis. Further studies and extended registry are needed to identify persons at risk for this potentially fatal AEFI and may be aided by detailed clinical, serological, and molecular analyses which were beyond the scope of this study. Considering that this fatal adverse event may affect healthy individuals, such registry and surveillance programs may improve early diagnosis, close monitoring, and treatment.

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5

    Currently, in Germany 127.7 million vaccinations have been administered. This study looked at 25 deaths of which 5 were possibly linked to vaccine caused myocarditis. As the researcher’s state, more research needs to be conducted. The lack of a control group is also a significant problem.

    They also made the assumption that the cases of sudden death were caused by the vaccine because the deaths occurred shortly after the vaccination. That is an assumed correlation, not causation. I wonder what the incidence of fatal myocarditis is in the general population and how it compares to fatal myocarditis assumed to be caused by vaccines. Myocarditis can be caused by a lot of things.

    They did 25 autopsies and found alternative causes of death in most of them.

    Most studies have demonstrated that the risk of myocarditis post-vaccination is low. The vast majority of cases are very mild and resolve within a few days.

    The risk of getting myocarditis is much higher if you catch COVID-19.

    Again the Epoch Times article is exaggerated BS.
     
    Nwolfe35 and Caligula like this.

Share This Page