Getting closer to trimming the fat. After Newt gets out after the ABC special interview, Santorum and Ron will be splitting the "Non-Romney" 75% of the vote.
Talk about Political insider BS. Romney went from Front runner to 2nd or 3rd over night. He lost IOWA by 34 votes after 181 precincts had voter irregularity..but the 8 in which he ( Romney won last time ) was to have won was lost and never to be found ? And reported the 2 days before the Next S.C religious conservative vote. Santorum wins in Iowa finishes ahead of Newt in N.H and wins the pastor vote in Texas and now PERRY endorses Newt ? Newt is getting the conservative religious vote ..even with all his anti conservative baggage and WRONG statements during the last debate. Chile does not have a voluntary ss system. It is a MANDATED system where you are FORCED to pay in. So Romney the FIX IS IN is getting railroaded out and you sheep will get 4 more years of Obama. As I said months ago ..I will NOT VOTE for Newt Gingrich for any position in government.This whole deal has a NEWT crapola written all over it. I hope his ex wife destroys him... Santorum is getting Hosed.. 3 % inflation $ 4 dollar gas. 15 trillion dollar national debt. and FOX keeps hammering Romney with an all out negative spin. Evangelical this and that . the conservative religious votes is scared your vote matters more than their religion. The newt devil is dancing in the streets of purgatory...and Obama loves it.
the primary process is working as intended Freddy, what say you [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmyyZ7Eh3IQ"]Queen - 'Another one bites the dust' music video - YouTube[/ame]
After Santorum told those of us under the age of 40 that the fact that we would receive far less if anything from SS is irrelevant and that our money is needed to keep the government out of unfunded liabilities, I would vote for anyone remaining over him. Really, Rick, you gonna bleed us dry and leave us and our children with the debt as well. Kiss my ass. I would vote for Newt over Santorum due to his SS stance alone.
This cant be! Two of the "Top Tier Candidates" that every network was parroting back in August are gone? The media tells you bull(*)(*)(*)(*)! Trust them!
Newt is the only one who really stands a chance at keeping Romney from getting the nomination at this point. If he really goes down after the interview with his ex-wife, then Romney has it locked in. Santorum and Paul are not going to get enough funds or momentum to top Romney.
Did anyone really think the Perry "I would send our troops back into Iraq" statement was a plus? Does anyone think that the play on the social issues is going to give Santorum a leg up in this race? Is there a possibility of Newt getting the nod after everything that his past has to offer comes out? Romney only gets 25% of the support for being the "front runner". Ron Paul 2012.
Now you think Ron doesn't have the ability to get his message out without the huge bankroll of Romney? That is becoming a stretch to try to say Ron doesn't have a chance.
Not going to happen. 90% of Santorum's and Newt's votes would go to Romney when they eventually drop out of the race. Very few are going to go to Paul.
He has a chance, just not a realistic chance. It's a combination of having several issues that are just too far beyond what the mainstream conservative base can handle, and an obvious refusal to try and reach out towards conservatives. Paul is too comfortable in simply appealing to his base and forgetting about everyone else. That's not the way to win.
In other words, Ron is NOT corrupt politician who will compromise his principles to get a head. That is fine by me. But for those "far out there ideas" other than foreign policy, what are you talking about?
The other guys.. Paul.. absolutely ZERO BUSINESS EXPERIENCE. NO EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNMENT. Santorum. SEE ABOVE. Washington insider ..lost last election due to corruption and ethics charges. New Gingrich. ULTIMATE INSIDER..corruption and ethics in both government and personal life history.No business EXPERIENCE..No EXECUTIVE experience. The true ANTI ROMNEY..corrupt insider..and evil. Romney... How many ethic charges against him ? ZERO. How long in Washington ? ZERO. How long as state Governor 1 term. How long as BUSINESS EXECUTIVE ? 25 years. How long married to same wife ..34 years ? How long belonging to same church..lifetime. How many jobs has Newt Gingrich created..? 8.... personal family . Staff. How many jobs has Romney created ? 100,000 can say with out Romney they would NOT have a job. How much wealth has Romney created..? 113% for 12 years ..PENSION FUNDS.. private investments. Newt's Private investment fund was sued by teacher pensions for cheating. THEY LOST MONEY..FOX would never go there would they ? When you pay over $ 4 gas this summer.. remember the Washington insiders did NOTHING to end that. Newt Gingrich ?? Garbage in ..Garbage out
I'm not saying that I even agree completely with that narrative against voting for Paul, it's just the reality of his electability. He's very far from the mainstream conservative base, and that will cost him votes. Whether he is corrupt or not, he isn't going to win. Paul doesn't even think he is going to win, and has said that his running is mainly to advance the libertarian cause, at this point.
You didn't answer the question, other than foreign policy, what is so far out there? Balanced bugets? Ending the artificial inflation from the FED? Reforming the government beurocracy? Ending the over reaching, ever growing federal government control over all of our lives that are NOT constitutional?
Good move by Perry. It shows he's interested in saving the country; not in personal gain. Remember that Republicans don't have the STATE RUN media carrying their water for them like the Democrats do! Case in point: the upcoming hit job on Gingrich by ABC News just before South Carolina voting in their never-ending effort to CHOOSE the Republican of their choice. You would absolutely NEVER see them do any such thing on Obama....or any other Democrat for that matter. The STATE RUN media is too much in the back pocket of the Democrat party to report in a fair and balanced way. Just as they kept quite about what they knew about John Edwards during the Democrat Primary....they have kept quite about any negative stories on Obama. Didn't even examine his connections with the Rev Wright or the other guy that Obama claimed was "just a guy in my neighborhood." So, don't worry; the Republicans are not going to let the STATE RUN media determine things for us as they did back in 2008. We KNOW exactly what they are doing.
Less candidates means more votes on the remaining candidate(s), means more power for the establishment/elite. The estab is going for a maximum number of votes on a single candidate, this way they reach a maximum amount of power. They are always seeking for absolute power over the masses/system (study some European history, empires) Three empires in Europe, in the USA they caused a civil war (1861 - 1865) The fouding fathers have warned (they knew this time would come, they knew about European history, what tyranny means)
