Present arguments for your trust in science, without using your scientific texts...

spamming

You are spamming, which is a TOS violation.

 

So report me... also tell the moderators to pay attention to my rationale (rebuttal to your claim) already provided.

 

Actually that tje same silly argument used countless times which makes no sense . If YOU believe in somerhing YOU have to prove it . Thats the way a true argumentation works , you are just trying to hide you dont have any proof for what you believe in .


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met behulp van Tapatalk 2

 

Present arguments for your trust in religion, without using your religious texts...

One thing that frustrates the heck out of me, (and many others no doubt) is the circular nature of arguments put forward for religion based on their religious texts.

If you can come up with a decent argument as to why anyone should follow your particular god/religion without reference to that particular gods/religions dogmatic texts, I'd like to hear it.

I think it will be interesting to see who can do so, and who can't.

Are you getting my point here?

 

I'll give you an unassailable argument, but first:

Nobody needs to "put forward" an argument for Science; the results of Science are everywhere and enjoyed by everyone, well, almost. The fact that Science doesn't need justification is so self-evident that one might be suspicious of anyone who would make it an issue.

Let me know whether you need the unassailable argument.

 

The perfect cross, that I personally have experimented and produced, is 'light' (electromagnetic).

It is the exact same 'energy' that enables every and any atoms that anyone can combine, ever.

ie.... the facts; life is of light (all cases)

i dont need to references anything to share them statements are true.
what say you?

 

Post capacity surpassed.