President of the Boy Scouts says longstanding ban on gay adults... >READ MOD WARNING<

um, no

it's education and that is why it's vital for parents to be told of the proclivity of pedophilia among homosexuals

Let the parents then voice if they agree with letting their little boys be alone with a male who engages in gay sex.

 

The Boy Scouts are losing their friggin minds. They just banned water guns. Really? That was one of the most fun things about my childhood, next only to water balloons.

 

So says peer reviewed research and the entire medical and psychological community.

you have been proven wrong. Sorry

- - - Updated - - -

And as has been pointed out, with peer reviewed studies, gays are not more likely to be pedophiles.

 

And the studies showing this proclivity doesn't exist? Or doesn't that count, since you disagree with them?

They will do this anyway, of course. But eventually, once people realize that the problem only existed in the warped minds of the ignorant and fearful, the issue will just fade awy. The kind of fear you express all the time can only live in the dark.

 

This is false.

Mod edit: It's not against the rules to say someone is posting false information, but it is against the rules to accuse them of deliberately lying. Find a different way of making your point, or risk infraction and banning. Thank you.

 

Here's the agenda:

What a crazy agenda.

 

But we know this isn't true, as the entire medical and psychological community has empirically shown.

 

Ew

*shudders*

That's so sick.

I find it ironic that to the people in this thread that oppose our views, find it necessary to claim that you're not gay (even if you have gay sex) unless you identify as such. These are the same ones that view us as bigots and/or homophobes just for not supporting gay marriage or gay cub scouts. It leaves no doubt in my mind that they are indeed very confused and/or chemically imbalanced.

 

I didn't offer an opinion. I've given you the studies. Since you've been informed and continue to post the same things over and over, you are posting false information (Mod edit)

Pointing out you've been proven wrong isn't trolling.

Again, posting the results of peer reviewed research which proved you wrong isn't a personal post toward you.

- - - Updated - - -

There is no proclivity.

How do you know they have gay sex?

Mod edit: It's not against the rules to say someone is posting false information, but it is against the rules to accuse them of deliberately lying. Find a different way of making your point, or risk infraction and banning. Thank you.

 

No, they all deserve to die. If any of my kids were touched by an adult, I'd beat them within an inch of their life. Especially if it was a male.

 

But the majority of offenders are heterosexual so if you actually wanted to mitigate risk you would advocate banning heterosexual males

 

I hate to be the one that brings in more facts to pile onto yours, but I'm guessing these people don't understand why there have never been men leading girl scouts, and women leading boy scouts. For decades it's been this way, for a reason.

 

Here is another suggest....accept culture differences.

 

How anyone could even try to refute that is beyond me. Going by their logic, successful white men are poor black women.

 

Your analogy is off. It'd be more like saying that just because you play hockey doesn't mean you play hockey.

- - - Updated - - -

So who's gonna sail around the world and prove to us that homosexual sex isn't homosexual?

 

Lies are lies.
I see lots of that.

 

How many members present and future is the Boy Scouts going to lose over this decision? a hell of a lot more then the would lose for not allowing gay scout leaders
very many Boy Scout troops are sponsored by churches how many churched are now going to stop being sponsors?

there already are alternatives to the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts and their memberships are growing by the month

 

Why should it be if it's male to male?

Anyways, his warning was to stick to the topic, which wasn't gays pedobearing little boys.

 

And yet you continue to say red is green. Again, adult sex orientation is not related to pedophile. One is adult attraction one is prepubescent attraction. There is a difference Early teens vs adults. Comprehend?

And one can claim anything they want. You are doing it. What is the breakdown of that 1% that isn't your own personal opinion?

 

You did not answer any of my questions, so I will repeat them. So you think it's acceptable to not hire (or fire) someone because of their sexuality? To deny them housing? To refuse to sell to them? Is it your position that it's perfectly acceptable for the straight community to leave homosexuals in the streets, penniless and homeless, to just freeze or starve to death?

 

Once and for all. PROVE GAY = PEDOPHILE. You can't and you won't.
And just making numbers up doesn't mean a thing
The question is, why are heterosexuals hiding their attraction to young children?
Where the heck are you getting 1% vs 50%, pulling it out of your behind, obviously. That would mean your acting irrationally.

If it's and but's were candy and nuts.........
If red is green and green is red........

 

Well, since heterosexual is normal, of course there have been more cases. But the keyword is heterosexual. If we were meant to be gay, none of us would even be here and our ancient ancestors would have been spat out or butt honked out to the floor.

 

Why the reference of numbers that are false? (Mod edit)

Mod edit: It's not against the rules to say someone is posting false information, but it is against the rules to accuse them of deliberately lying. Find a different way of making your point, or risk infraction and banning. Thank you.

 

People against gay marriage aren't going to go into a gay owned business that supports such, That's the difference. What was it, one person that did it just to prove a point? Any normal person isn't going to waste their time hitting up a place that is against what they believe or want. That goes for all people.

 

How are you defining "normal"?