What about the stuff near the top of the tower, the restaurant + the transmitter at the top of the north tower? The stuff at the top of the building did not have the building fall on it, and as per my example with an aircraft falling out of the sky, things do not automatically just pulverize themselves.
I'm sorry, this is a common sense issue, if you can not get the reasoning without the crutch of pages of math, .... well I can't help you.
I'm quite aware that you are incapable of backing up your incredulity with actual science. This is why the truth movement died.
Common sense....mmmmmm....Every hear of Quantum Fluctuations? would those be common sense? Common sense says those are impossible, but yet they happen. Don't get me wrong here...I certainly cannot provide the math so, I would never beg the question and I have the sense YOU cannot and are now in over your head.....which is why you are avoiding posting the math.
This is a matter of what you believe to be true, there are bits about the physics of a building destruction have been demonstrated by bits shown by shows such as Top Gear & Myth Busters but people apparently not getting the information. { Tangent, there are stories, Fables, that have simple themes but have also deeper underlying messages that can be considered the "moral to the story" } With that noted, the bits like TOP GEAR or MYTH BUSTERS can not come right out and tell the public 9/11 was an inside job, they would become unemployed so fast ..... so they show bits like the pickup truck on top of a building to be demolished as an illustration of the practical physics involved and therefore in hope of educating the masses they produce these bits. it doesn't take "math" to prove that 9/11 was an inside job.
Actually, it is...and less you can prove the position, you don't have a claim. - - - Updated - - - we have asked you repeatedly for the math, the calcs...what specific laws of physics have been broken..and you have yet to post a credible response. Why is that?
Actually no, it isn't required to ascertain that the whole 'official' story is a big, fat, ridiculous lie.
Actually, it is...if genericBob want to continue to claim that gforces would have altered the how flight 175 crashed into the tower, and continue to claim that the laws of physics were violated...then he needs to put up or shut...AND you should know this. He is claiming, via math, it didn't happen...he needs to show his calcs, as well as, name the laws of physics that were violated. His in over his head and he knows it.
Max speed differential to still appear to not slow down on 30 fps video 125 mph, so at loosing 125 mph over the length of the aircraft that works out to 28 gs. 28 gs is more than plenty to destroy the airliner. so what is the issue?
you allege that the only destruction of the airliner happened inside the building, outside of the tower, the airliner was still intact, and experiencing 28 g force, and having an 11 degree angle off perpendicular ..... good trick that.....
I guess the NSA is riding extra rough shot today. My communication here is especially invasive today. Anyway, demolition was obvious. The question is, when will we get a new investigation?
And when that investigation show there was no evidence of anything other than what we all saw, will you be satisfied?
I'd love to be proven wrong. Yes, I'd personally, be very satisfied. That would mean that our government ISN'T as corrupt and criminal as I believe that it is (in this case). No Zelikow type editors, no changing timelines, no secret or 'confiscated' video tapes. Nothing. Just truth. Yup, I'd be well satisfied at that point. Thanks for asking.
