Prove Flight 93 was a bunker buster

Indeed:
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182383-heres-good-one-2.html#post3769861

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182383-heres-good-one-3.html#post3771987

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/flight93page1

Here's an informative pdf: http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/SomersetCountyEmergencyManagementAge.pdf

There are more pdfs on the page and, at this link, the contact information "some people" have been claiming was never linked to:

 

And NONE of that did anything to Prove Flight 93 was a bunker buster.

Why can't you guys just admit you can't prove it? No shame in that.

 

One would think so.

 

But it did prove the contact information was given a long time ago, contrary to some people's assertions Hannibal was lying and never linked to the contact information.

The fact also remains that the OP has a vague and flawed premise: there's no proof anyone said they believed Flight 93 was a "bunker buster", ergo the thread is misconceived and should be locked imho.

 

I'm curious...how long did it take you to check all the links and pdfs on that webpage?

It looks like you just logged in, made a form post, and logged out. Take a little longer to check that page, since for so long you overlooked the significance of the information there.

 

Who was saying that?

 

I've seen them all before. They didn't offer proof 93 buried then and they still don't offer proof 93 buried now.

If I missed the proof in them, please post the proof here so we can all see.

 

Who complied the document on emergency management?

 

Dunno. Who?

 

I thought you had, but I may be mistaken; you don't appear to have done that. I apologize if I'm wrong on that point.

I probably confused it with where you did accuse people of lying about presenting evidence when they had:

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...rove-most-flight-93-buried-3.html#post4857539

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...rove-most-flight-93-buried-4.html#post4861804

And quoting someone's posts to prove what they've said is not obsessing over them.

Inb4 any whining.

 

You don't know? You said you've seen them all before.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/223209-prove-flight-93-bunker-buster-26.html#post1060846745

That's why you're certain there's nothing on that page addressing your questions...because you'd read everything there already.

I thought that's what you meant....I think most people did too.

 

I was looking for proof 93 buried, not who compiled it.

Now if you are done playing your games, is there any proof 93 buried in the links you keep posting? If so, please post for I didn't see any.

 

Asking for evidence 93 buried is playing games? Weird.

As soon as you can Prove Flight 93 was a bunker buster.

You were on your way to once, with that video, remember? What happened? Did you realize that video didn't offer proof 93 buried?

 

But if you read the document you could tell us who complied it. You would have to read the document, which is part of the information on that page you said you saw already.

You do understand that when you go to a webpage for information, sometimes, for bandwidth reasons, they don't host all media themselves, right? Therefore the reader has to follow some links and may even have to download files.

When you say you've seen it all before, it's assumed you have not only read the page contents, but examined all the media the page links to.

Unless you mean you were completely familiar with the page's contents before Hannibal linked to it for you last year.

 

When you're done stalling, if there is any proof 93 buried in the links you keep posting, please post it for I didn't see any.

 

"At many points even stooping so low as to..."

Yeah, uh huh.

 

No, I realized you have no evidence to post which is why you refuse to post any and continue playing games.

 

So that video shows evidence 93 buried?

 

There goes Mr. Honesty clipping quotes again.

Still waiting on your evidence.

 

So the video you once said did offer evidence 93 buried in fact does not?

As soon as you post yours.

 

Not sure who you're replying to, but if you're referring to one of the webpages Hannibal linked to here

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182383-heres-good-one-2.html#post3769861

in response to your questions soon after you registered,

it should answer all your questions about flight93, including any about being a 'bunker buster"(which no one has yet claimed, btw).

You want answers, you tell us that you've read the information in the webpages, in your own words "I've seen them all before" , but you don't seem familiar with the content.

This makes people hesitant to engage you because it looks like you're being dishonest about your goals.

 

I already did.

Now it's your turn.

 

Nope, still don't see any evidence in those links that 93 buried. Please post if there is and I just missed them.

No one claimed 93 buried?

My goal has always been if the conspiracy theory that no plane buried in Shanksville has been debunked, or alternatively, has a 757 buried in Shanks been proven.

My goals have never changed, but keep trying to assassinate my character if it makes you feel better, although is just shows you're losing the debate.

 

Link? I must have missed it.