Psy-Opera: Proof of Nuclear Demolition?

You continue to dance to the tune I play. Dodging and ducking whenever asked to verify your claims. I can count on it for endless amusement.

Even your signature is a lie, because you couldn't ignore me if you tried.

Now, will you ever cite your source, or continue to dance?

 

Oh...I can ignore you. I'm just enjoying your dancing tonight, and I just wanted to highlight it a little before third shift.

 

Well, you certainly danced away from providing any sort of support to your claims. Well done, 'truth seeker'.

And no, you can't. Your sig bears witness to your lie.

 

Thanks. Well done to you as well "official" defender of "all that is officially official". Outstanding dedication to your cause.

 

Well, we understand our roles then, as you have just admitted.

I'm on the side of the evidence.

You can't manage to provide evidence for any of your claims.

 

Well, that's your propaganda, not mine.

I'm on the side of the truth. You're on the side of distraction/disinformation/confusion/distortions/propaganda/ridicule/and plain old fashioned lying. All in the course and scope of the job.

 

Then prove you're on the side of the truth:

Cite your sources.

Otherwise you just keep getting caught in lie after lie.

 

No matter what I put here, you'd mangle it to death with disinformation. Don't you see the motivation isn't there to.....Ohhhh...wait...I get it. Hey! Good job!

 

How would we know, since you never support your wild claims?

Is the reason you don't cite sources is simply that you are afraid?

 

Afraid? No...not exactly. If I cite a source, you rip it to shreds. I'd rather the reader find the information themselves. Again, it sticks better that way, while completely bypassing your interference.

 

No doubt. Great admission.

 

Good job...disinfo dude.

 

Once again, faced with bitter defeat, the 'truther' slinks away, hurling ineffective insults over his narrow shoulders.

 

Ok Buck....I've had enough of you. It was fun, and confusing as usual.

Readers...take note.

 

Take note indeed. Once again you fail to support your claims.

 

Bye.....we're done...back to ignore mode.

 

Probably for the best.

Let us know when you're ready to cite your sources.

 

Looks like I'll be keeping my credit card in my pocket for a long time. No need to sign in to PayPal.

Once again, no 9/11 Denier can go 5 posts in a row directly answering questions and supporting those answers with evidence.

 

The behaviour in this thread has been entirely unacceptable, and the thread has therefore been closed.

Note again this thread:
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182771-general-warning-about-section.html

ALL users need to take the time to read the rules again, including the ones about baiting and insulting other members, and about public discussion of moderator actions.

This standard of behaviour will not be tolerated - you are ALL expected to comply with the rules of the forum.

Any repeat of this kind of behaviour will be taken extremely seriously by the moderators.

This forum is a place for 'respectful debate', as specified in the forum's Mission Statement. 'Respectful debate' does not include baiting, insulting or accusing other forum members. Other forum members are NOT the topic of the debate. If you do not wish to discuss issues in the manner of 'respectful debate', please do not post here. If you continue to ignore the forum's Mission Statement and rules, the consequences for your forum membership will be inevitable.

THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOUR MUST STOP RIGHT NOW. THAT APPLIES TO EVERYBODY.

I hope that is clear to you all.

Cenydd
Site Moderator