Psychologists "try" to help troughers deal with their 911 conspiracy denial

Oh you havent noticed? He doesnt usually hang around too long when I show up.
Has something to do with my posting case law that he does not like.
We go back to other boards prior to this one.

 

I am going to do my best at deciphering your butchered language here. First, I am not in denial of anything. I have done a TON of research on building 7, and I am fully convinced I have a much firmer understanding of what happened than you ever will.

I've asked this so many times and I'll ask it of you again. Why, 9/11 was an inside job, would the government pay people to come here and argue with you? You and your ilk are a fringe few that pose no harm to anyone. There is no fear of truthers bringing anything to any courts, there is no fear of truthers coming up with any evidence, and there is no fear of you guys "bringing the story to light", as you seem to believe. The government, on any level, would have no reason at all to pay people to disinfo a group of people that debunk themselves. It would be stupid, and there is absolutely no point in it. The government pays disinfo agents to take care of things relevent and that need attentions.

Everyone here chats with you guys for different reasons. Some because it's funny watching people make asses of themselves, some want to honestly try and help people learn, and others just like to post on these boards.

In case there is a government team watching and they are looking for disinfo agents, please contact me via this message board. I would gladly quit my job and type whatever it is you want me to type for a paycheck. Please, let me know.

 

I don't blame him. Your idiocy can only be taken in small doees.

Riiiight. You mean that you have actually posted something and cited a source in the past?

 

nothing like making his point

 

yeh idiots have a tendency to quote a lot of supreme court cases so what does that make you?

 

According to truthers, quoting relevant information and facts makes you an idiot.

 

There is a lot proof that 9/11 was an inside job on the internet.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746

The problem is that the government seems to be paying public relations agencies to fill up the internet with disinfo sites to muddy the waters and make the real info harder to come across. There are some people who take the trouble to sift through the BS to find the real info and make lists of it and post it to counter the government's strategy. That means that those people who don't have the time to do any sifting can simply look at the real info. That is a big problem for the government who is trying to keep people confused and in the dark. The more people who understand the truth, the harder it is for the government to keep up the big lie. The courts are owned so no truthers will be able to bring anything to court but if the people are all informed, it's still bad for the government. No informed people will want to serve in the military and nobody will support the government's wars. The government will have to keep the uninformed soldiers away from informed people who will tell them what websites to look at. If the uninformed soldiers get informed and find out they're the bad guys, they won't fight very well.

I doubt you disinfo agents are fooling very many people.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222

If truthers weren't a problem for the government, none of you would be here. You're all here because you're getting paid.

 

Apparently since you can't defend your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) 9/11 theories, you have to attack those who expose your bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Think anyone is falling for it? It is just another one of your paranoid delusions. Want proof? Show ANYONE you've convinced your theories are true. You CLAIM the theories are so well thought out and backed up by evidence that one cannot help but agree with them, yet NOT ONE person has fallen for your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies.

So just keep stacking up those lies, Scott. It isn't our credibility you are trashing.

 

Your posts are so lame that they're hardly worth replying to but I'll reply to this one. You talk as if you'd spoken to every viewer and lurker who reads these threads. I know I'll never get you regular pro-official version posters to acknowledge anything but there are lots of viewers and lurkers whom you claim to represent. Are you going to say that you've spoken to all of them?

 

Nope. But if you had actually managed to convince one, don't you think they would have said something? Or gotten their friends to look? It is YOUR bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim that nobody can look and not be convinced you are right. I am correctly calling that a complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lie by you. You know it is a lie. I know it is a lie. The deafening silence in support of you proves it is a lie. Yet you will go right on believing your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) doesn't smell even though it can drop battle hardened landfill flies at 100 yards just from a small whiff.

 

So, you think that every viewer who agreed that the evidence shows that 9/11 was an inside job would post something. That's pretty lame.

Why don't you analyze the actual evidence instead of trying to appeal to people's emotions?
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...r-911-conspiracy-denial-2.html#post1061779281

 

More bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies from you. When do you ever stop lying your ass off? Where did I ever say that? I said ONE of them surely would. You claim they ALL would be convinced by the sheer magnitude of your "greatness", yet not ONE has ever stepped forward. Don't you think it is a little odd not one has stopped to pat you on the back and say good job or I believe now?

I have. And then when I point out the flaws you go running away like a little girl who saw a huge spider. A good example is you claimed Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon and landed at Reagan. When the major flaws of your theory were exposed, you ran. When you came back, I restated the flaws. You ran. That is how it works. You can't stand the truth, so when it is obvious you are posting lies, you run.

So how about you actually respond to the major flaws in your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) theories instead of spamming the boards with your prior failures in the vain hope someone actually believes your tripe.

 

good post.

yeh there are other agencies, but look to the air force mostly

its all about misdirection, keep everyone arguing bull(*)(*)(*)(*) til so much time has gone by that people hardly remember.

But that is backfiring on them in a huge way now that history is so readily available and those in the know, know that the so called founders designed a slave state for the benefit of the then aristocracies.

The forces of propaganda are so powerful you will rarely find anyone who has researched it to that extent of understanding.

Everyone is fed puppy chow and kool aid and they believe what they are told to believe.

 

That's not what happened at all. People can read it and decide for themselves.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/230813-proof-positive-no-plane-flew-over-pentagon.html

You are all rhetoric and no substance. You seem to be trying to sway those viewers who don't take the time to click on links and actually examine the proof of an inside job as some of them may be swayed by rhetoric. You might as well do that because that's about all you can do as you have no chance of swaying those who actually look at the proof.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746

So true...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2Xh5eN2fXY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsD4_mEhZzM

 

That is EXACTLY what happened. You didn't respond to the intital post and continue to run from the facts. You took one made up picture of a supposed flight path and pretended that was all the evidence you need when it isn't even evidence. Could you explain the fact not one witness saw any object, much less a passenger airliner fly over the Pentagon at that level? No. Can you explain the fact the security tapes don't show the plane or any disturbance to the smoke that would be caused by a plane flying over at low level? No. Can you explain the fact that not one witness claims to have seen two objects heading towards the Pentagon? No. Can you explain how the two objects were suppose to arrive at the Pentagon at the exact same split second to convince everyone the plane had hit? No. Can you explain the flight paths and how they are almost 90 degrees from each other? No. Yet despite all these questions, you want to pretend you've won. BULL(*)(*)(*)(*)!!!!

This coming from the dishonest poster who either spams irrelevant links or runs away screaming (or both) is just hysterical! Why can't you answer the questions? Why can't you present evidence your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is true?

So where are the ones who were interested enough to follow the links? Why didn't they come back and tell me I am full of (*)(*)(*)(*)? Oh right. Because your links couldn't convince a burning man he is on fire. Why? No evidence, an inability to defend your position, and the sheer lunacy of your paranoid delusions.

Wrong yet again. You're the one who is constantly running, not me. All I do is poke massive holes in your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) that YOU can't answer, yet if your lies were true, you should have no problem at ALL answering the questions.

Pathetic!

 

you ok?

those links were right on target!

 

Thanks, Koko. Nothing confirms someone's links are pure garbage like Koko's seal of approval!

 

(Sigh . . . ) Poor Scott just doesn't realize we're here because he is so entertaining.

I wish Koko would learn how to properly quote a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing post.

So when will the truthers be bringing something to the courts?

 

No amount of facts will convince a truther because they will just ignore it over made up "facts" by other truthers that have no bearing in fact but only in innuendo. The people that have studied the data like MIT or Purdue don't rate because they are not rabid conspiracy theorists.

For instance, one of the alleged experts on 9/11 in the truther world is has a degree in religion. Appropriate.

Here is a similar truther movement in the same vein.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

I guess everyone needs a good movement at least once a day.

 

So Scott is here (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing about how he can't get his information out, while he is posting all of his crap.

Scott, do you see how stupid you look? That's the point we keep making, the government doesn't need to pay people to look stupid. Your absurd paranoia and fear of everything repels people from your movement.

 

Koko\Scott, I know you're mostly full of it, and have absolutely no idea what's going on, so I am going to make this easy.

Name 1 thing the truth movement has done in order to get it's "message" out. Let's stick to the last 5 years just to show the movement is still fresh. Acceptable listings of progress would be:

Court Cases
New Evidence or any evidence at all

Non acceptable listings of progress would be:

New youtube video's
New postings on sites like "spurstalk". It is not a 9/11 related board, and the only reason Scott links to it is because they let him spout his bull(*)(*)(*)(*) ad nauseum.

So anything would work outside of youtube and other non related forums. Come up with any evidence that the 9/11 troll movement has made any progress and it will go a long ways to making you look credible...even though we all know you're not.

 

the only person who looks stupid anywhere is someone that would say the above proving they are completely displaced from reality and delusional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Water_Army

Governmental programs of social-media manipulation are found worldwide.

The U.S. military is developing "Operation Earnest Voice" to use sockpuppetry software that will "fake online personas to influence net conversations and spread US propaganda."[SUP][10]

[/SUP]



Nothing like proving who the real **** is eh....

government paid sock puppets are more generally regarded as;







their purpose is to incite anger so posters dissatisfied with their masters treatment get their posts pulled and even banned from forums completely.

Much like the ******* that reported me for what his psychopathic delusional imagination could fancy as a meaning rather than its correct meaning based on proper construction and the manner in which it was actually used and that person knows who they are.


its common knowledge and anyone who has spent any time what so ever on the boards can spot them with both brains tied behind their head. we all know. that means nobody is fooled. get it?

 

nice post!

 

So much paranoia in one post. Amazing.

(Pssst ... "The Matrix" is a work of Fiction. Sorry to burst your bubble.)

 

So ... go for it.