Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Purge the deniers

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by sawyer, Feb 26, 2015.

Page 8 of 8
  1. Lord of Planar

    Lord of Planar New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2014
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is the real scientists who have not played into politics of power and alarmism that are the victims.
     
    Lord of Planar, Mar 28, 2015
    #176
  2. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,139
    Likes Received:
    74,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    http://billmoyers.com/2014/05/16/the-relentless-attack-of-climate-scientist-ben-santer/

    This is just ONE example - the scientists at the centre of the so called "climate gate" had to face SEVEN DIFFERENT investigations and to this day they are still accused of malfeasance
     
    Bowerbird, Mar 28, 2015
    #177
  3. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well that means there is no solid proof that they didn't doctor documents. Apparently there was no good evidence to expunge them even after 7 investigations. AGW is not proven and 'Climate Change' is nothing more than a vague term that is a replacement for the now de-bunked 'Global Warming' in order to keep the government money coming.

    It's really a nice scam, as long as the climate is changing (which, of course it does anyway) the climatologist-alarmists are sucking up $2 billion in government revenue (translation..for lefties.....TAX DOLLARS) annually.
     
    RPA1, Mar 28, 2015
    #178
  4. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,139
    Likes Received:
    74,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    :roflol: I rest my case
     
    Bowerbird, Mar 28, 2015
    #179
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hoosier8, Mar 28, 2015
    #180
  6. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,490
    Likes Received:
    2,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just as there's no solid proof that you didn't <insert name of horrible crime here>. Therefore you are clearly guilty of that crime.

    Hey, it's your standard. More Stalinist behavior, making up kooky reasons as to why someone must be guilty.

    So, you and hoosier will probably have to fight it out, concerning who gets to be DearLeader of the People's Republic of Denierstan.
     
    mamooth, Mar 28, 2015
    #181
  7. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are really not interested in the science at all, are you?
     
    Hoosier8, Mar 28, 2015
    #182
  8. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's not a crime to 'cook' statistical data so it looks more cohesive than it really is. It happens all the time. It's best to be skeptical of theories based on statistical data alone.

    Cooking stats is not a crime (as I already said) so guilt is relative to one's own perspective. I'd say the real 'guilty' ones are those that refuse to accept skepticism and make up names for those that don't fall in lock-step with their AGW propaganda. What does Stalin have to do with Climate Change?
     
    RPA1, Mar 28, 2015
    #183
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,139
    Likes Received:
    74,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The best one is that NASA has mentioned the word Muslim so it is not to be trusted
     
    Bowerbird, Mar 29, 2015
    #184
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "we need carbon tax to redistribute wealth...we need government to run things...everyone else should shut up" ~ Bill Nye, the science guy.
     
    Hoosier8, Mar 30, 2015
    #185
  11. bobgnote

    bobgnote New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NASA should know the game we play is RIOT and RICO, directed, to profiteering, at gang war, not real war.

    So we're going to get a hot reception, any time, 2030 - 2065, I bet, and we won't be back, in the lower 48 area, ever again.

    THAT will be from not getting along, with Muslims AND messing with them, super hard AND not noticing the injuries.

    Not noticing climate change seems worse, so I anticipate getting nuked, to shards and scraps, one year, after a bit of Cali Kool-Aid, from Fukushima.
     
    bobgnote, Mar 31, 2015
    #186
Page 8 of 8

Share This Page