'Art of war' coming from YOU koko? <snicker> I doubt sun tzu had koko's wild conspiracies in mind....
yeh thats your infamous last and completely meaningless buzzword, since many things appear to those who dont get it as a conspiracy when in fact it may and often is not. no one who knows anything pays much attention to that worn out soap box rant any more. lol It certainly does not change the childish and lo iq levels troughers try to force a debate in. entertaining at best but has no value.
Well, obviously you would be the expert on playing with rattles and blocks. Aside from that, your claims are utter nonsense. No big surprise there.
troughers made the claim, I just repeat it and have been waiting for admission of the fraud for over 10 years. Especially since we can all see its fraud on its face. on the other hand Do you?
thats my whole point, that the trougher points do not hold water. in fact they are so obviously fake it insults a preschoolers intelligence. So how does it feel to be on that side anyway?
Just fine,since you're full of it with your assessment And the word 'troughers' doesn't mean what you're using it for..
The funny thing is I can absolutely shred any of your "theories" and you can't present a single shred of evidence your theories are actually correct. Last I saw, you were trying to do it with pixelated images and trying to pretend it meant something. That might work as evidence in Romper Room, but not here in the adult world.
well then, lets start by your recital on the rules of evidence shall we? Fact is troughers do not have a clue, and though you are correct that the courts are the next best thing to romper room in america, their standards are far superior than anything I have seen from troughers out here. so lets hear all about your rules of evidence. then when you have completed showing us how educated troughers are on "what counts" then tell us all about how to properly sort out evidence.
its called establishing a fact. if you think you can deliver the goods feel free to go there with him or take his place and lets roll.
Just as I thought. Koko doesn't have (*)(*)(*)(*). I know it. He knows it. Now everyone else knows it.
no better way to show ineptness than to dodge pertinent matter. At least people would respect troughers if they simply came forward and admitted they were clueless. think maybe thats why they are scorned? by normal people? when asked to put up.
Enough tap dancing. Present the evidence you believe you have. Oh right. You don't have any. You know it. I know it. Hence the tap dance. The more you dance, the easier it is for everyone to see you have nothing, you know you have nothing, and are afraid everyone else now knows you have nothing.
you are obvious completely confused. I challenged patriot to inform us about the rules of evidence. This dance you started is not about what I cant provide but what troughers cant provide. So I am very happy to see that you decided to stop dancing and get down to business. Now I await hearing all about the rules of evidence since you decided you wanted to help ole patriot out and stand in for him.
next time let patriot respond to challenges put to him himself. Especially when you dont have the answers. I will await his answer since your purpose was solely to find a dancing partner.
Keep running Koko. We know you have nothing. You were told to present evidence that backs up your theories. You try to deflect the discussion into what constitutes evidence. Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Focus, Koko, FOCUS. So why don't you just tell us which theory you believe THIS time and present evidence to back it up. It doesn't matter what definition I use. If it isn't evidence, I will be able to rip it apart. If it is evidence, it will stand on its own. How about a nice waltz now, Koko. I'm tired of the foxtrot you've been dancing for the last several posts.
wow thanks for "telling" me. You were told to prove you understand the rules of evidence and you too fail to back it up. Show us you "get it" first.
No need. You don't have any evidence. Now do the tango. Your evidence should be able to stand on its own merit, wouldn't you agree? Yet you can't even produce weak evidence. Next we will move on to the funky chicken!
typical, blind troughers want to lead those with sight, again. presenting evidence to someone who is clueless what the rules of evidence are is a total waste of time. get some school under your belt then come back and show us you know what evidence is in the first place. the thousands of posts these guys make and they dont have a clue what bonafide evidence is. LMAO get it? nah LOL
Nice chicken dance! How about the cha cha next! Come on. Post your evidence. Or run away again and prove to everyone just what kind of truther you are. I love making truthers make complete fools of themselves. Not that it is hard. All you need is the truth and the fact they have no evidence.
