Re-Posted at AE911.org: How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition

It's NOT a 'farce' either

 

RE: Farce ....

"Editor-in-chief Manning is calling the present investigation run by the American Society of Civil Engineers "a half-baked farce," and has condemned the destruction of WTC evidence."

 

Part of a quote without a source.
Fallacy.

 

and you alleged to have researched the 9/11
subject, however have no clue as to where this came from?

 

Did I say that?

Strawman.

 

thank you ever so much for making the point
that is by implication, you were alleging that you
had a very deep knowledge of the subject, and
now it seems that its really not so deep.

or?

 

Re:Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Let not forget the Jones/Harrit debunked paper.

Fraud.
Vanity press fronting as a Scientific Journal.
For starters.

 

You keep putting words in my mouth. Why can't truthers just tell the truth?

 

How about this, Where is this glorious INFORMATION
that allegedly proves suicidal Arab hijackers flew airliners
into the WTC & Pentagon and caused all the destruction
that day? If you have such perfect INFORMATION,
why not bring it on, rather than calling me silly names
and trying to negate the "truth movement" if the side that
has all the answers, would simply provide said answers,
that would clear the air once and for all.

 

The answers, sources and links have been provided to you time and again. You refuse to read them.

Go, start with the FBI PENTTBOM report, then go read the MIT conclusion. Let us know if y can provide evidence to refute their findings.

 

I am really saddened by the fact that a prestigious institution
such as MIT has allowed itself to become corrupted in the
process of protecting criminals.

WTC 1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by CD,
and no airliners were hijacked on that day.

maybe you dig the appeal to authority bit
and cite the MIT fraud as something to lean
on in support of the official story. I'll take
Logic & Reason over authority any time.

 

Not authority: evidence.
Don't care for MIT? Look at Perdue's findings. Not happy with them? There are dozens of private and professional entities worldwide. Do some research.
9/11 is one of the most examined and researched events in history.

You asked for documentation, I've shown you where to find it. Go. Read.

 

they arent findings, they are creation of an hypothesis that matches the official agenda.

just disqualified yourself entirely on that one

 

It's okay. I'm saddened a group of snake oil, conspiracy vultures have preyed upon people like yourselves who have an understandable suspicion of authority. They've twisted your thought processes so badly you can't see that no solutions are being offered to you. These con men want you to be afraid and suspicious and (hopefully) buy their books, DVDs, etc. Send money to their websites to "fight" the "cause".

But one thing they're never do is offer a viable political solution. Want to talk about criminals? The people inventing and making money off this conspiracy malarkey are the criminals.

 

Right, and all admire the emperor's new suit
and sing the praises of his tailor, however, this
does not indicate by any means that they have
the absolute end all, be all answer(s)

there is still this little problem of the total destruction
of WTC 1, 2 & 7, the missing flight recorders from "FTL11" & "FTL175" + the missing accounting for
the remains of the aircraft, we are simply being asked
to TRUST the powers that be to have accounted for the aircraft and then disposed of the aircraft bits?

I also, note that 9/11/2001 is the most poorly documented disaster since the invention of photography, where are the pix that were to have
been shot by the NYPD, FBI, FEMA, or any of the
employees of the taxpayers who were on site at the time?

 

Of course it is.

 

This is a very recent addition to the video library
very good stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nX8xt5YOjg

also see ...... 911speakout.org

Have a nice day

: )