The following are some excellent resources for debunking the lies of 9-11 Truth and its dwindling support base: http://11-settembre.blogspot.com/2007/04/english-section.html http://www.911mysteriesguide.com/ http://911vids.blogspot.com/ http://www.mikejwilson.com/911/ http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html http://www.debunking911.com/ http://www.freewebs.com/911guide/ http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/home http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm
Yes that journal contains my favorite paper on the subject. Brent Blanchard Editor in cheif at Implosion World, with decades of experience in controlled demolition puts it plain and simple. There is zero evidence of controlled demolition at the WTC on 9/11.
using DEBWUNKER links in desperation to try and debunk the truth that 9/11 was an inside job.classic.
Sure, but they rely on incomplete data sets. I've never understood why debunkers aren't transparency hounds. Like with either 9/11 or the JFK assassination - there is A LOT of documentation withheld from public consumption. One would think that debunkers would want ALL relevant information to further discredit the various conspiracies. And at the very least, to be able to say the government isn't withholding information as it traditionally likes to do.
Is there anything in any of those threads that addresses the issue of the craft that hit the Pentagon's being too short to be a 757? http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm (5th picture fronm top) This one piece of inside job proof closes the whole case by itself. This three part video is a good summary of proof that the government did it. "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA#t=2720 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DegLpgJmFL8 I've seen people try to obfuscate it but I've never seen it actually debunked.
So, I guess the eyewitnesses how saw the jetliner & the plane debris identified to come from a jetliner....aren't to be believed, right? ....Back at ya.
Evidently not; the craft that hit the Pentagon was too short to be a 757. http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm There are other witnesses who say they saw a smaller craft which is consistent with the evidence. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=10632 Planted fake witnesses would be part of a plan this complex.
That's rich. The majority of eye witnesses made statements of seeing a jetliner...yet you choose to pic just a few to support you idea...and then claim the others were plants. You have evidence these people who eye witnessed the jetliner were plants?....or is that just another form of "goddidit" type of argument that relieves you producing the actual proof?....well?
I looked at his math and found the fault, he is taking measurements and not factoring in that the plane did not come in perpendicular to the building but at an angle, which of course makes the measurements off (because the length of the plane is improperly calculated)and the poster wrong.
Shocker. It's no surprise there are some people who believe they saw something different, that's pretty much the case with all events like this. Like those who didn't see a plane crash into the WTC....Many people, many different angles, many different lengths of time viewing.... What he CAN'T do is, match the debris to anything other than the jetliner.
This is one in which I have been provided a first hand account. My first cousin is a lawyer in Arlington, Virginia who personally saw the plane crash into the Pentagon. While he wouldn't recognize one model of jetliner from another, he does recognize the colors of American Airlines, on which he is a lifetime gold Frequent Flyer (i.e. has more than a million miles on them). It was an American Airlines commercial jet that he saw fly into the Pentagon.
Anticipating the Twoofer response: a. He is a paid gubmint shill! b. He is a trougher c. He is a co-sy-op
All you nutters make claims to have evidence for thermite/mate, low level nukes, high energy device....but you can't back up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) with anything other than bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You look at photos and then claim are something you know nothing about and cannot prove...and then claim that's the "Truth" until someone proves your negative false. You Nutters do just one thing...and that is dishonor those who died and those who tried to help.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYkdAivZwEk This is just awesome! Michael Shermer goes over all of the conspiracy claims about WTC, building 7, pentagon and destroys them.. He even takes many calls from truthers and answers them as we watch. This is a smart man that knows the facts and is versed in critical thinking. He not only answers the truther questions by debunking them, he explains what makes them tick. You can't miss of second of this, it's such a thorough debunking of what truthers claim and also offers great insight into the truther's themselves. There's a little added bonus when he talks about the JFK assassination too..
There's a lot of reliable sources for dispelling the MIHOP theory, but can someone point me in the direction of materials that dispel the LIHOP theory?
No, because no rational person is interested in such stupidity as the claim that the plane was too short. The image of the full-length aircraft is the right size and some retard decided to mount the picture his ear crickets drew for him in its place, yards from where it was supposed to be.
