Resources for debunking 9-11 Truth

Discussion in '9/11' started by Ronstar, Dec 1, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
  3. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
  5. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes that journal contains my favorite paper on the subject. Brent Blanchard Editor in cheif at Implosion World, with decades of experience in controlled demolition puts it plain and simple. There is zero evidence of controlled demolition at the WTC on 9/11.
     
  6. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    using DEBWUNKER links in desperation to try and debunk the truth that 9/11 was an inside job.classic.
     
  7. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Using youtube videos and paranoia as a way to prove that 9/11 was an inside job. pitiful.
     
  8. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Debunkers rely on facts, details, research, and evidence.

    Troughers rely on Youtube videos.

    :)
     
  9. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sure, but they rely on incomplete data sets. I've never understood why debunkers aren't transparency hounds. Like with either 9/11 or the JFK assassination - there is A LOT of documentation withheld from public consumption. One would think that debunkers would want ALL relevant information to further discredit the various conspiracies. And at the very least, to be able to say the government isn't withholding information as it traditionally likes to do.
     
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is there anything in any of those threads that addresses the issue of the craft that hit the Pentagon's being too short to be a 757?

    http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm
    (5th picture fronm top)

    This one piece of inside job proof closes the whole case by itself.


    This three part video is a good summary of proof that the government did it.

    "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA#t=2720
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DegLpgJmFL8

    I've seen people try to obfuscate it but I've never seen it actually debunked.
     
  11. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, I guess the eyewitnesses how saw the jetliner & the plane debris identified to come from a jetliner....aren't to be believed, right?

    ....Back at ya.
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    889
    Trophy Points:
    113
  13. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's rich. The majority of eye witnesses made statements of seeing a jetliner...yet you choose to pic just a few to support you idea...and then claim the others were plants.

    You have evidence these people who eye witnessed the jetliner were plants?....or is that just another form of "goddidit" type of argument that relieves you producing the actual proof?....well?
     
  14. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I looked at his math and found the fault, he is taking measurements and not factoring in that the plane did not come in perpendicular to the building but at an angle, which of course makes the measurements off (because the length of the plane is improperly calculated)and the poster wrong.
     
  15. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Shocker.

    It's no surprise there are some people who believe they saw something different, that's pretty much the case with all events like this. Like those who didn't see a plane crash into the WTC....Many people, many different angles, many different lengths of time viewing....

    What he CAN'T do is, match the debris to anything other than the jetliner.
     
  16. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is one in which I have been provided a first hand account. My first cousin is a lawyer in Arlington, Virginia who personally saw the plane crash into the Pentagon. While he wouldn't recognize one model of jetliner from another, he does recognize the colors of American Airlines, on which he is a lifetime gold Frequent Flyer (i.e. has more than a million miles on them).

    It was an American Airlines commercial jet that he saw fly into the Pentagon.
     
  17. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Isn't that classic? :roflol: Debunkers debunking the truth.
     
  18. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anticipating the Twoofer response:

    a. He is a paid gubmint shill!
    b. He is a trougher
    c. He is a co-sy-op
     
  19. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You forgot d. He has his head stuck in the ground.
     
  20. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    when a 9-11 Truther accuses someone of having their head stuck in the sand, its a compliment.
     
  21. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, I did. but, head up his ass would be a Twoofer.
     
  22. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All you nutters make claims to have evidence for thermite/mate, low level nukes, high energy device....but you can't back up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) with anything other than bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

    You look at photos and then claim are something you know nothing about and cannot prove...and then claim that's the "Truth" until someone proves your negative false.

    You Nutters do just one thing...and that is dishonor those who died and those who tried to help.
     
  23. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYkdAivZwEk

    This is just awesome! Michael Shermer goes over all of the conspiracy claims about WTC, building 7, pentagon and destroys them.. He even takes many calls from truthers and answers them as we watch. This is a smart man that knows the facts and is versed in critical thinking. He not only answers the truther questions by debunking them, he explains what makes them tick. You can't miss of second of this, it's such a thorough debunking of what truthers claim and also offers great insight into the truther's themselves. There's a little added bonus when he talks about the JFK assassination too..
     
  24. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There's a lot of reliable sources for dispelling the MIHOP theory, but can someone point me in the direction of materials that dispel the LIHOP theory?
     
  25. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, because no rational person is interested in such stupidity as the claim that the plane was too short. The image of the full-length aircraft is the right size and some retard decided to mount the picture his ear crickets drew for him in its place, yards from where it was supposed to be.
     

Share This Page