Reviewing Atheist 'Lack Belief' in Deities theory. <<MOD WARNING ISSUED>>

Since your idea of debate is to agree with a blatantly wrong post or claim it deems you not worth the attempt to debate. Go somewhere with your little buddy and play with shiny objects. You would cause less potential harm.

 

It is easy to debunk your claims, and when done you decide that it is all not true. Just like a little whiny baby complaining to mommy that the other kids will not listen to you. It is getting old and already is pathetic.

 

You do realize that there is at least SOME objectivity, in any 'debate'. There is a consequential progression in 'logic', where one point follow another, & the premise & assumptions made must have a rational conclusion. You don't merely 'declare' reasoning.. you demonstrate it. So to 'debate', you must present logical points, that are compelled by your premise & assumptions. You cannot merely make an assertion, & call it your 'argument'. Assumptions can be challenged, in a logical debate. That is what good debating & inquiry is about. But you cannot merely assert your assumptions, you must prove them, with reason & evidence, for your subsequent conclusions to be valid.

 

He at least was honest about it unlike you and your theist leaders.

 

but he wasnt by any stretch of the imagination and saying so proves atheists call anything they say honest because they do not know what it is or how to apply it

 

or Hitler, Bin Laden, the list goes on, real theist winners right?

 

No, I think I will hang around with you guys who are unreasonable and irrational. It reminds me just how fu**ked up some americans are, mentally. Faux liberals cannot debate, they misdirect. Gives them a terrible headache. Thinking does that to some people.

 

Debunk away, if you have the mind to do it. I imagine it will be quite the trip into the illogical, irrational and unreasonable. I notice a terrible lack in critical minds here. Could not think their way out of a wet, soggy, brown paper bag. No Gore Vidals on the faux liberal side.

 

Care, you just took their whole bag of tricks away, if they paid attention, that is. Yet we can expect the continued use of the gibberish, the insults, the attacks, when they cannot wrap their mind around ideas which seem foreign.

I will debate only when I am interested, but I never dismiss ideas unless they are completely irrational and lacking logic. But it gets on my nerves when the weasels do what they do best.

 

All of which the poster on question fails to do, at least convincingly.

 

Sounds like a definition of what you constantly do and expect no recriminations.

 

Exactly how would you know thinking gives a terrible headache? You have yet to display that capacity.

 

As previously stated, you deny any debunking with your obvious lack of logic and rational; thought.

If you were to admit to the critical thought on display here, you would run screaming into the woods.

 

I pointed out a lack of debate. That is all. On ideas. And all I see are weasels, and misdirection. I think that is a fair observation.

But hell, let trump of some GOPher say something you detest, and boy will the other guy's ideas be debated. LOL So you ain't foolin' anyone. Except the fools.

 

I am tired of playing this game. But you can play with yourself.

 

Your making a strong belief claim, there is no evidence of any deity, which is not true theists present ample evidence I just find it all generally ambiguous such as personal testimonies or an unexplained event being divine when they may not investigate other things or logical sophistry. If deities are beyond our ability to perceive or deal with then I pointed out the only thing they can do is come down to our level and prove themselves before we get into other issues dealing with them. I can't rule them out but can't rule them in either so am in the center.

So I don't blame the theists their deities are the failure here, they have faith and I don't, until such time as the deities demonstrate their existance its pointless to argue for either side I believe.

 

It would be pointless if everyone here were agnostics, they have no dog in the argument, atheists have an equal obligation to prove their belief no God exists. Of course they fail, because they cant prove it. In fact JC was said to be God in the form of man, who did come down to your level.

 

Everyone sees that, at least the atheists on this board with one exception are purely flim flam artists, no rational debate what so ever.

 

You fail so badly that you have to quote a moron like Matt Slick to try to make a case for you. Bring YOUR point to the table and make YOUR OWN case. It is not agnostics and atheists failing to commit here it is you. You quote Slick and adopt a 'just asking questions' stance because if you posted what you actually believe it would be mocked for the nonsense that it is, just like how you pretend to be 'just asking questions' on Holocaust denial and 911.

Instead, you weaselly try to undermine science, atheism and agnosticism in the hope that you can cause enough distraction such that people will start to give your real opinions some credence.

If the general religious people on this forum want their religion abused by extreme politics then all you need do is stand by and allow this process to happen.

 

There are very few people on this board who are actually interested in debating their religion, instead they wish to debate the possibility of a god right at the beginning of time. They seam to lack the courage of their convictions

 

What is there to debate unless it is Scientology?

 

Never seen a debate on Scientology on this forum, would be interesting.

 

I would like to see that also but I believe they are not supposed to mingle with skeptics.

 

I was not aware that they are not supposed to mingle, it explains a lot!

 

They cannot watch or read anything negative about Scientology either.