Rhode Island legalizes Gay Marriage

Yeeaahhh, OK...sounds like your making stuff up...again...

 

I mean let's face it ... conservatism says women must give birth to gays ... even if the woman was legita-raped by a gay man ... LOL.

 

...from the minds of MaO'Bama voters...

 

Why is it not marriage?

It is marriage of course. It's marriage in over a dozen countries, including 10 states in this one

 

It is degredation and insidious perversity, not marriage.

 

Nope. Gay marriage is reality and isn't going anywhere

- - - Updated - - -

Source?

Has no relevance to 21 century

 

How so?

It is of course marriage. It's marriage in dozens of countries, including 10 states in this one. It is inevitable in all 50. I promise the sky will not fall and the sun will still rise

 

Its obvious, except to MaO'Bama voters.

 

No, rightist retards just hate the constitution and want to control every aspect of other peoples lives.

How about answering the question now?

 

You seem to lack the logic to maintain a consistent argument. Where you just quoted me was in response to YOUR assertion that the basis for marriage is procreation. That's simply not accurate. Marriage is not ONLY for procreation.

In fact, sexual intercourse is not limited to the purpose of procreation, either. Your argument continues to fail.

 

You wouldn't know a rational response if it bit you in the ass.

 

Who's making stuff up? Assuming that homosexuality is a mutation and not just a normal genetic possibility, isn't it more likely that it is an adaptive quality? Natural population control?

Having an official sounding term to back up your idea doesn't make your idea accurate. It's theoretical at best.

 

You know, that idea that Obama supporters are pro-gay marriage and Obama opposers are opposed to gay marriage is part of the corporate media farce that is designed to get you to adhere to one party or the other and thus support the big government for big business agenda in one way or another, right?

Obama, Boehner, Bush, Clinton, Dodd, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Frank, etc., etc., they all support the same corporate oligarchy and the corporate media plays you for fools.

Gay marriage isn't right because the Democrats support it and it isn't wrong because the Republicans oppose it. It's simply the most just position for those that support the rule of law over the rule of violent force.

 

"Marriage", at least the kind that we're discussing here, is a legal issue, and means whatever the law says it means.

 

You mean we managed to take one more step towards liberty and justice for ALL, right?

 

It's NOT just a legal issue,and you KNOW it

 

NO it is NOT inevitable.....what's inevitable is that a small fraction of the population will cease to be successful in forcing their mistaken lifestyle on others.

- - - Updated - - -

Calling a pig a cow makes as much sense as calling what homosexuals have as 'marriage'

 

I don't give a rip what your silly myth book says, at issue is the state of legal marriage. 10 down, 40 to go. It's no longer a question of if, merely when.

 

Until Rhode Island introduces a Prop 8 Bill where the People of Rhode Island proper will make that decision for themselves and not some bribed/blackmailed/coerced oligarchy entrenched over the People of Rhode Island.

This and other "legislative/judicial" gay marriage mandates are PRECISELY why SCOTUS must rule that Prop 8 stands and that the states' majority vote shall determine which sexual behaviors may marry and which may not.

In a hurry, people of all the states need initiatives to return the power to the people AND to specifically name in any petition to change "one man and one woman" that this will set up legal precedent for ANY consenting adult outside one man and one woman to marry. States must be informed. This behind the back "gay marriage steamroller" taking power away from the People to deterimine their social norms HAS TO STOP.

 

of course it's inevitable. freedom and equality always is.

not really. same sex marriage is no different than opposite sex marriage. two people joining their lives together financially,romantically and legally. all marriage does is create a legal kinship where none existed prior.

- - - Updated - - -

and if the state has it's own prop 8, it will be struck down as unconstitutional just lilke prop 8 has been. civil rights are not subject to popular vote.

 

One extremely biased gay judge who lived with his male partner for decades and wanted to marry him before the hearing, and the same judge who arbitrarily disqualified Pro-Prop 8 witnesses because he essentially said they weren't sympathetic to gay marriage [!], is not the basis for overturning the Will of millions of Voters.

And since when did SCOTUS render a decision on the legality of this gay judge's kangaroo court's overturning Prop 8? I didn't hear they rendered a decision? I thought that was supposed to happen this June.

Link please?

 

why do you keep lying about walker disqualifying witnesses?
which judges in the federal appeals court who upheld his decision were gay?

scotus is still deliberating. prop 8 remains unconstitutional unless they overturn the lower courts decision.

 

People can read the gay "judge" Walker's extreme bias here, and his disqualifying witnesses anti gay marriage starting specifically page 25

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35374462/California-Prop-8-Ruling-August-2010

A gay judge takes evidence he doesn't like and the witnesss that presented it and simply expunges it from the record after the trial is over so his decision to approve gay marriage, a thing he and his decades-long male partner wanted to do forever, can fly.

He is now retired. I wonder if he's actually allowed to practice law anymore, even if he wanted to?

 

why do you keep lying about walker disqualifying witnesses?
which judges in the federal appeals court who upheld his decision were gay?

 

Read about it in my thread link.