Ric Grenell to Newsmax: 'Infuriating' How Dems, Media Manipulated '20 Election

The almighty left wing "IF"

 

I don't need a link when you posted the numbers yourself. Sad on your part.

 

History shows that the Democrats passed the Civil Rights bill of 1964 and yet somehow you think you can dispute that to being wrong. How sad.

 

Clearly, lmfao

 

That's just to give you the BENEFIT of a doubt. I don't have any and I don't see others coming to your aid. Why is that?

 

NOPE, the American Thinker say you are wrong!

Republicans Led the Way on Civil Rights - American Thinker

 

Well thank you! But in this case the imaginary is all yours bro

 

Well if we're being honest Hils was and is a sleaze bag. The Mussolini argument is BS buzz words. Trump did nothing to take away your freedoms nor has the republican party nor has the library board. I assume you supported lefty governors telling people they can't work for months or kids can't go to school while they're parents are paying for that very schooling. In my mind that's was way closer to crossing the lines of freedom. When the left says things like this it designed to divide and I'll say again, pushes people to Trump. Most are intelligent enough to know what Mussolini did and to claim the Republican party wants that is f'ing ignorant as hell.

 

Yes did you miss the reporting on it?

 

He had an energy policy, an immigration policy, a head on foreign policy that considered American interests primarily.

 

As I said NO amount of evidence that can be presented to you will ever suffice you have made up your mind no matter what and are left with your simple dismissals and attacking the source. HUNTER is shady, not the reporting about him. Giuliani is your red herring and nothing more. The emails have been confirmed. And anyone with any common sense would realize that YES had the MSM instead of covering up the matter done their job and investigated it, social media instead banning ANY discussion of the matter and banning anyone who dared there is PLENTY here to have changed to vote of not only those on the cusp but those who had already made up their minds.

"It’s been more than a year since The Post published the first of a series of damning stories about then-candidate Biden, based on material on his son Hunter’s abandoned laptop.

It’s been more than a year since Facebook and Twitter colluded with Democrat-friendly media to censor a story that reflected badly on their preferred candidate less than three weeks before the 2020 election.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey blithely admitted after the election that locking The Post’s account for two weeks on the basis of a non-existent “hacking” offense was a “mistake.”

Facebook has never revealed the results of the “fact-check” it used as a pretext for blocking The Post. It likely never occurred because Facebook never contacted key recipients of emails we published from the laptop.

But the damage was done. The coordinated censorship of America’s oldest newspaper — with more than 80 million readers online alone — amounted to election interference.

If the full story of the Bidens’ international influence-peddling scheme had been told before the election, polls indicate it may have affected the result. Almost 50 percent of Biden voters knew nothing about Hunter’s laptop scandal, according to polling conducted after the election by the Media Research Center, and almost 10 percent said they would not have voted for Biden had they known. "
https://nypost.com/2021/11/28/media...joe-biden-by-censoring-hunter-stories-devine/

 

This was about the EMAIL verification of the email about the business meeting that Biden lied about being there. Refute it.

As to the signature match

"Retired Special Agent Wayne A. Barnes, a 29-year FBI veteran who mastered signature analysis while unmasking Soviet spies during the Cold War, says the "R.H. Biden" signature — short for Robert Hunter Biden — on the receipt issued in spring 2019 from John Paul Mac Issac's repair shop in Delaware matches those on documents known to have been signed by the president's son, such as Social Security cards, driver's licenses and other public documents.

"The signature on the computer repair store from April 2019 was signed by RHB," Barnes wrote in a 24-page report commissioned by Just the News.

Barnes noted the receipt signature contains many of the same distinctive characteristics that Hunter Biden's signature contained on other public documents and exhibited no signs of forgery or digital replication.

"The general pattern and flow of the signature matches the other known signatures from RHB," Barnes wrote. "The R has its vertical line with the normal slight slant to the right. While the beginning of the top curved part of the R does not begin where RHB usually starts his — that is, by picking the pen off the paper and starting a new line. Here it commences from the bottom of the vertical line, lazily not lifting the pen off the paper. But then it goes up to his normal starting position, to the left of the top of the vertical line. This line then curves to the right and around and down to the middle of the vertical line.

"This curve of the R from the right, appropriately crosses the vertical line with a loop. This is in true 'contemplator' fashion. It is something which appears essential for RHB when writing his signature. It then goes back and up to the right, something well demonstrated in the other known examples.

"The line up to the top of the H follows the tail from the R as seen in the known signatures. Then it is the by-now-familiar butterfly pattern of the H which creates the full letter," it added.

You can read the full report here:

File
Signature analysis of RHB - Wayne Barnes 2021-07-03.pdf
https://justthenews.com/accountabil...-fbi-handwriting-expert-says-signature-laptop

 

Well, sorry for not seeing it your way. If you're upset about the media being biased, you're going to be upset a lot. Did you get all worked up when Fox and other conservative news sources told lies about things? I don't think so.
See if you can follow this: I don't care what all these news channels, talking heads and other sources are saying what it means to them. I look at the data, and I hear a lot of "Biden should be charged" " Biden crime family" etc, but you still haven't answered the question, but have typed a whole lot, WHAT HAS JOE BIDEN DONE THAT WAS AGAINST THE LAW?
And I don't mean what is your opinion, I mean what verifiable information shows Joe Biden broke the law.
If you just don't like the way he behaves, ok. If you don't like his son Hunter, ok. (I don't either, btw)
I just don't see what he has done wrong in what I've read. It's not illegal to meet people.

 

Heck, they are still telling lies and many on this forum are still insisting that crimes were committed which affected election outcomes but they just can't meet any burden of proof required by any US court. In addition, it would appear that the Trump DOJ was totally impotent when it came to Joe and Hunter even though they beat the B/S drum like this thread. Spouting out crimes but no DOJ Trump officials could bring them to any judge. The feature is the smear and the talking point. Disingenuity is the common theme of many posts in this very thread.

 

More "righties" repeating the lie:

“Last year, prosecutors interviewed Mr. Archer and subpoenaed him for documents and grand jury testimony, the people said. Mr. Archer, who was sentenced last month in an unrelated securities fraud case in which a decision to set aside his conviction was reversed, had served with Mr. Biden on Burisma’s board, starting in 2014.

People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity. Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.

In some of the emails, Mr. Biden displayed a familiarity with FARA, and a desire to avoid triggering it.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES, Hunter Biden’s taxes are just one element of the broader investigation stemming from work he did around the world, including when his father was vice president., The Justice Department inquiry into the business dealings of the president’s son has remained active, with a grand jury seeking information about payments from around the world., By Katie Benner, Kenneth P. Vogel and Michael S. Schmidt, March 16, 2022.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html

GD NYT!
Right?

 

Somehow we managed to keep democracy when emergency public health rules demanded people get vaccinated for a variety of infectious deseases, and yes get masked in urban centers in prior flu epidemics. Trump is not Mussolini, he's not quite that smart - at least in his first four years. but the intention was there for him and the entire GOP too and I have no doubt that efforts to undermine local and state rules certification process by local officials who refused to participate or 'find the votes' concentrated on states like Florida, Michigan, Georgia, Texas by 2024 might well prove 2020 was just a test run. They will be smarter next time, and they will have replaced the less cooperative, or moved their authority.

What you really don't understand is the 'left' does not want Trump voters or even those tempted by him anywhere near our party or candidates. We see Trump as a cancer on the GOP and the country, and we see people like you and any body tempted by him for any reason as pre cancerous cells. You would a hell of a lot more dangerous in our party or our movement than you will ever be worth so stay away.

You may not be deplorables, but you will absolutely vote for them given the right incentives and we don't want deplorables winning Democratic primaries.

 

Before the election? Yes I missed that. Did it happen? Links?

 

A BLOG!!! You're basing your argument on one blog!! Good for you!! That is a pathetic stance to take.

 

Well GOLLY GEE! You are certainly free to throw up a link with your alternate vote tally LMFAO

Until then you take your pick
1964 civil rights act passed by republicans - Search (bing.com)

 

He didn't have any energy policy and if he did it was patchwork at best. If he had an energy policy then he's responsible for the oil situation we're in now. HE's the one to embrace Russian oil and when he did that with the onset of covid causing oil to drop to negative the then threatened the Saudi's with sactions for the murder of the reporter so they said go scratch. He begged them to produce more and made a deal for 2 years.....and that's were we are now.
His immigration policy ripped familes apart and did nothing else. He lucked out with covid with immigration. Sill waiting for Mexico to build and pay for a wall.
To say he had ANY kind of foreign policy is just LOL BS.

 

"Alternate vote tally"? WTF are you talking about? I didn't dispute the vote tally. What is wrong with you?

 

He freed up the domestic oil industry and they were producing, we didn't need OPEC, didn't have to beg them for help. His immigration policy was to stop the flood and get back to some degree of selection, the family separation started in the prior administration, I forget who it was running that one. Where we are now is exactly where Biden put us. Gas is $4 and up and the border is a relic of past sanity.

 

If you have AN alternative vote tally to the numbers I linked then throw them up bro But we both know they are spot on correct and irrefutable You just didn't like being shown your obvious mistake

 

He was terrible for the oil industry!! Where do you think he was good for it?l He didn't "free up" anything? Obama had more wells going and Biden has more wells going. Yeah, we needed OPEC and he blew it.
No, Trump started the no tolerance seperation policy. You can prove me wrong...or try anyway.
The border is just fine right now.

 

You're not making any sense. You have the right vote tally but to make an argument that it passed because of Republicans is nonsensical.
“Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”
― George Orwell, 1984

This link will answer all you questions.....oh wait, you don't have any, you "proved" your point. LOL
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/republicans-party-of-civil-rights