Ron Paul simple did not get elected because the elite did not want him .deal with it.

What is a "throut"?

 

oh come on,I want a serious reseacher like rightwing to come on here.thank god for the ignore list.some people sure have an obsession over me bringing their grudge from one section from there over to here.sheesh.

 

Yep to no surprise the pattern contiunes with him.change the subject,evade the facts and make unfounded slanderous lies about him since the truth hurts.

The only thing you got wrong here in your post though right wing is i think you MEANT to say that we currently give at least four times more aide to Israel than we do their enemies.

That was the only mistake you made in your post there.That is why the establishment made sure he did not get elected because he is opposed to giving aide to israel and is not a member of AIPAC.thats why they did not care if Romney got elected or if Obama got reelected because they both are members of AIPAC and Romney like obama,gives aide to them.

and Paul unlike both of them,wants to get rid of the fed which is the reason our country is in the mess it is.

 

you've noticed that about his posts as well huh? hee hee. he never gets tired of embarrassing himself getting taken to school by me and rightwing and others such as yourself.hee hee.

 

dynamite post.well done.

- - - Updated - - -

Dynamite post from you as well.gives standing ovation.

Johnson has similiar views as Pauls and i would vote for him in a heartbeat but the establishment will just sabotoge his campaine the same way they did with paul coming up with rule changes at the last minute again so its a waste of time to vote.

america has the most ignorant society.the sheople just dont get this continuing to go out and vote for Hilter-Romney or Stalin-Obama. it never changes.

 

Hey rightwing,you did not comment on this video here like i asked you to,since all the government apologists on here keep playing dodgeball with this video and ignoring my post about FDR as well,you are the ONLY one I have left to talk to about this video and the comment .please comment on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbf3iaEbAuY&list=PL41B48841A41B3212

 

Ain't that the truth.

I didn't see half the idolization of Obama that I did for Paul in both 2008 and 2012.

The comic Mushroom posted earlier in this thread couldn't have been more spot-on. That's the impression given by just about every Paul supporter I've ever heard or seen. All we had to do was elect Paul and he would swoop in and get rid of all the bad men and things would be better because Ron "Christ" Paul knows best and wants to save us.

Paul as a person, as someone else said, is probably a likable well-mannered and respectable person. I have nothing against him as a man. As a politician and prospective leader of my country, I couldn't possibly be more opposed. Same goes for his son.

 

as always,you government apologists keep playing a nice game of dodgeball here evading the facts i bring up and changing the subject when they are cornered. why do all the ron paul bashers all have reading comprehension problems?

I spell it out to them dummies style and they play dodgeball changing the subject and evading the facts brought up not addressing them EVERYTIME they are cornered. a judge would laugh at you all in a courtroom and you would be laughed out of it by a jury in a heartbeat the way you wont tackle any facts brought up to you when your cornered.

 

so says the government apologist who keeps playing dodgeball evading facts and changing the subject when cornered addressing someones posts who wont tackle my facts instead of my posts since they DO deal with facts. how convient

 

Dude.

You don't bring up facts, at least not ones that can exist without substantial spin and imagination. In order for your facts to be facts, I have to believe a whole host of crap that isn't. I'm not even sure if you know what a fact actually is.

And that's a fact.

You need to take a class on distinguishing between objective facts and subjective conjecture, because your posts contain, almost exclusively, the latter. That's why nobody takes you seriously. You're handing them a pile of (*)(*)(*)(*) and trying to convince them it's fine china.

Facts don't have to be believed in to be real. Your cases on why Ron Paul didn't get elected very much do. I have to believe that all these planets aligned and there was a massive conspiracy. I have to believe that (*)(*)(*)(*) just for you to make sense when the obvious answer is much simpler, straight-forward, and verifiable.

Ron Paul didn't win because people didn't vote for him. Doesn't get much simpler than that. You can invent whatever reasons you want as to why they didn't, but the bottom line is, he just didn't have the numbers. He didn't have the numbers from his own damn party and from his base.

Grow up and accept it, or act like a child and invent alternate realities. Your choice.

 

so much for the slanderous lies being invented by the government apologists here that ron paul is a racist.

Yeah he is such a racist, all these blacks here put their support behind him instead of Obama.what a racist paul is.

 

Even if Ron Paul was as non-racist as a person could be, he still lost the primary race because he didn't get enough votes.

Also, I like your "Here's some black people that like Ron Paul so he can't be racist" logic.

- - - Updated - - -

Going to go ahead and do some more "apologizing".


I'm sorry to have to tell you, but, Ron Paul lost because people didn't vote for him.

 

STILL playing dodgeball as always I see. for the hundreth time,hard to get enough votes for the nomination when the key state for the republican nomination is rigged and the establishment comes up with last minute rule changes at the convention to sabotage your stategy.

For the HUNDRETH time,its no conspiracy THEORY like you desperately want to believe that Karl Rove was in charge of counting the votes in the Ohio primary,its conspiracy FACT son.

YOU are the government apologist in denial,not me.YOU should be apologizing to the american people for being afraid of the truth and only seeing what you WANT to see. you keep playing dodgeball with this opening post of mine selectively only reading PARTS of it.


the american sheople have been brainwashed and conditioned that we elect these people and put them in office.many sheople posters here just dont get it that our votes dont matter.

that the establishment selects whoever they want to be their new puppet to do their bidding and they get elected.

as was the case with Bushwacker,they were pleased with the atrocities Obummer committed aginst the american people so they made sure he got reelected.

thats why they sabotoged ron pauls campaine and change the rules at the RNC convention to make sure Romney their other establishment boy,got the republican nomination and rigged the ohio vote for him to be the nominee.as long as him or Obama was president they did not care.

there was never a shread of doubt for me that Obama would get relected because of above reasons.Its the same story and script over and over again.wake the hell up already and deal with it,you do not put these people in office.the Globalists do.


someone like ron paul or gary johnson will never have a prayer of being president because they believe in the constituion and serving the people instead of wall street and the zionists jews.wake up already!!!!!!!!! five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence. Reply Reply With Quote Blog this Post .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
potter, Durandal liked this post

 

Talk about a non-answer..

Why don't people vote for him? I think the answer is very simple: He's too American to be compatible with either major party.

 

Or it changes at a glacial pace, and with the manipulators shaping the course of change every step of the way.

 

Maybe. Who knows. I think he's an extremist, and I doubt I'm alone, but you'd have to go ask each person that didn't vote for him why they didn't to get a real good idea.

But the bottom line is, Paul didn't lose because the MAN blocked him or whatever kooky conspiracy theory is popular this week. He lost for the same reason that every candidate ever loses. Not enough votes. If 9/11 guy wants to assume they didn't vote for him because they are sheeple and all the other stuff he always repeats, fine. That can be the reason why they didn't vote for him, but it doesn't change the underlying fact that it was the lack of votes that prevented him from being the candidate.

 

another video that will go ignored by the goverment apologists no doubt but this guy,a jew himself,hit the nail right on the head why Paul did not get elected and why Gary Johnson will never get elected as well.he even talks about ron paul in here.

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=828

 

for the last freaking time,it would not matter if everybody in the country voted for him.WE DO NOT PUT THESE PEOPLE IN OFFICE!!!! your in denial about this.

the establishment puts them in office.its not a theory that elections are rigged.its a FACT you cant deal with.you wont watch videso we post that talks about this cause the truth scares you.

I have spelled this out to you dummies style a 100 times here but you arrogantly and blatantly ignore it that Romney stole the republican nomination with the rigging of the Ohio Primarys.

I knew once then when Romney illegally won that nomination,it was game over for Paul. AGAIN,DUMMIES STYLE,you cant win the nomination when they make up last minute rule changes at the convention to get delegates.you obviouisly only see what you want to see cause you keep ignoring this little fact.

 

yeah the corrupt two party system of demopublicans and reprocrats which is really a ONE PARTY SYSTEM so the sheople think they have a choice in who gets elected.

the establishment does not care if romney or obama is in just as long as it is not paul which is why they went to great lengths to sabotoge his camapine.

 

I like how it's easier for you to believe that literally thousands of people have conspired to keep Paul of the ballot, yet not even exit polling showed that he was a winner in primaries that he lost. There is absolutely nothing that shows he got the votes he needed but still lost. I really cannot fathom why you are so invested in conspiracies or why it's so horrible to accept that people didn't vote for Ron Paul.

If he really did win, if Romney got the election because of the vast conspiracy, where are the throngs of people protesting because they voted for Paul and he didn't win? If so many people voted for him over the other guys, where's the outrage? Why is it confined to a small subculture of people like you, a sub-culture I might add that seems willing to believe anything, no matter how outrageous, that appears to be anti-establishment? Why, after Paul ran in 2008, did his supporters just let it happen?

Of course I know exactly what you're going to say. We don't know about that because the man doesn't want us to. Yada yada yada.

The real truth of the matter is simple. The MAN didn't even need to stop Paul. He didn't have the votes to begin with. He was never a direct threat, ever. No action by the man was necessary at any point to prevent Paul from winning because he was never going to win. Ever. Not only are you inventing the vast conspiracy, you're inventing the idea that without it, Paul WAS going to win. All fantasy.

 

First off Paulbots simply cannot handle reality, the reality that the American People do not want what Paul was selling, in multiple elections. He was not even close in any of his bids. As for his big defender here, their handle says it all, crackpots gravitate to other crackpots.

 

The bottom line is this: No one who isn't on one of the two major party tickets is going to get anywhere near so much as the freaking debates, let alone the presidency itself.

 

Naw, I think there just needs to be better challengers. Paul was old, he didn't want to play the game, and I doubt he even knew how to. Plus he didn't really have wide appeal. He was a radical. Someone that's really going to make it work for third parties is going to have to be able to move within the system, not stand outside of it and stomp his feet.

People are going to be sick of both parties by 2016. The time is ripe for good third party challengers. They just need to to stop being the kooks and the fringe guys like Jesse Ventura and Ron Paul and Nader.

As much as I hate to say it, Rand Paul is probably the best situated. He knows how to shmooze when he needs to, but still seems to have his father's radical flare.

 

You've been brainwashed if you think Nader or Paul is a freaking kook.

 

Paul is. Couldn't say for sure about Nader, I was thinking more fringe when I added his name.