scott e.'s new birther thread...

i know, i love youtube..

 

Extremely important! Proposed order by Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii egregiously misrepresents the case and the law

Posted on | October 22, 2011 | 6 Comments

Letter from Nagamine 10.19.2011

See attached letter from the Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii Jill Nagamine. (it was reported to me, that this deputy attorney General Jill nagamine is married to Obama family personal attorney Todao Nagamine, who handled the divorce of Obama’s half sister Maya Soetoro from her first husband. Nagamine refused to deny or confirm this fact). Nagamine’s proposed order egregiously misrepresents the case and the law.

I can see more manipulation in HI. I didn’t even get a call back from the court reporter to advise me, how much will I need to pay for the transcript, even though I went to the court reporter services after the hearing and filled out an official request for transcripts. Needless to say, I did not get a transcript. I need a volunteer in Honolulu to go to the 1 circuit court, 1st floor, court reporter services and talk to the supervisor, letting them know, that the court reporter is not responding, did not give an estimate and the Plaintiff needs the transcript in Case Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka 11-1-1731-08 RAN .

Also, I am concerned in regards to actions of someone at FOX news, KHON 2 HI.

Channel 8 reporter was at the hearing as well, but the judge allowed only 1 camera. It is customary for the networks to share the raw footage, if only 1 camera is allowed. Channel 2 FOX- KHON 2 HI ran the story twice in prime time and it was story #1 that day. Channel 8 reporter contacted FOX and asked raw footage for his story and a documentary, that he does about me. FOX said that someone recorded something else on top of the recording they made in court. Channel 8 reporter told me that this is impossible, as FOX had to download the raw footage on computer prior to editing, so they cannot be telling the truth, as they have to have raw footage on computer. I need some volunteers to contact Lori Silva, their News Director and demand to forward to me the raw footage, that they downloaded on their computers prior to editing, it could not be erased, it is on their hard disks.

This is extremely important not just for me, but for the whole country. We have an usurper with a stolen Social Security number and a computer generated forgery instead of a birth certificate. I have to break through. we really have them cornered, as according to their statues, I filed a proper appeal of an agency hearing and hey have to allow me access to the original in lieu of the certified copy obtained. I need the court reporter transcript and the video footage to submit emergency motion for reconsideration and emergency appeal and application for a writ of mandemus.

hey wong, do you think a couple of hawiiobots could check this out ?? could you ask at control ?

 

The only thing that needs "checking out", by reading that, is Orly's psychiatric prescriptions. They're obviously not strong enough.

 

He's on ignore. What is he asking to have checked out?

 

i can still tell when you're here though...

 

anyone born on US soil who's parents don't have diplomatic immunity.

 

first three paragraphs from wikepedia. so i say you are presumptous to call it all settled.

Status as a natural-born citizen of the United States is one of the eligibility requirements established in the United States Constitution for election to the office of President or Vice President. This requirement was an attempt to allay concerns that foreign aristocrats might immigrate to the new nation and use their wealth and influence to impose a monarchy.

The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen, and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. There is general agreement that the term encompasses, as a minimum, anyone born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen parents. Most scholars and politicians currently agree that the term includes those born on U.S. soil, as well as those born to U.S. citizen parents regardless of place of birth.

The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court and lower courts, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen. Although numerous claims have been put forth that the current president, Barack Obama, is not a natural-born citizen, the relevant courts have so far dismissed all lawsuits brought over this question.

 

this is pretty good...


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDrB--6U9UQ&feature=player_embedded"]CNN's BULLSH*T BIRTHER REPORT (R-rated) - YouTube[/ame]

 

Indeed, a very educational video. Anyone else learned anything from it? I sure did

 

Could this be all true? Is rebuttal from any Obamabot coming? At least an opinion that this is nothing of any importance?

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa9O2GhzvYk&feature=player_embedded"]CNN's BOGUS BIRTHER REPORT (G-rated) - YouTube[/ame]

this is the g rated version. this copy has about 50 hits a youtube the rougher version uses the phrase (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bag, has a bout a thousand hits so far. this is a good slow chase, let's watch the numbers, level of interest, same with the polland videos.

 

lol, what?

 

got time for a new scandal ??

Obama role in corrupting IL Teacher Retirement System pensions, Cellini trial, 2007 NY Times article, Where is Tony Rezko?, Where is House Judiciary Committee?

Posted on October 23, 2011 by citizenwells| 1 Comment


Obama role in corrupting IL Teacher Retirement System pensions, Cellini trial, 2007 NY Times article, Where is Tony Rezko?, Where is House Judiciary Committee?

“Why was Obama promoting Capri Capital and other investment firms at the same time that Rezko, Levine and Cellini were shaking them down?”…Citizen Wells

 

lol, birthers.

after having no reply to the reality of what natural born means, you effectively ignored the meaning, pretended like you weren't wrong, and posted more anti obama drivel.

and birthers wonder why they are mocked.

 

blah blah blah.

a) If you quote someone it is proper to actually- you know- say who you quoting. I know who it is because of context and the paranoid babbling but a non-birther, non-anti-birther who happened to drive through here by mistake wouldn't.

b) Not one mention of how Orly believes the Deputy AG misrepresents the case and the law. What a shock.

c) The judge would be the one who would decide if the Deputy AG did anything improper, and the judge seems oddly to think that Orly is the wingnut here.

Seriously more unsubstantiated Orly paranoid rants. Just the usual stuff she posts on her blog. Did you leave off the part where she requests more money?

 

Apparently Wash is quoting Orly, which means the most likely answer is that none of this is true.

What is there to rebute? Her usual unsubstantiated rantings? Point me to some solid claim she makes- other than some rumor she has heard second or third hand- and I will be glad to take a stab at it.

Not that you or Wash or Orly care whether she is lieing through her teeth or not.

 

Could what be true? Orly's headline is that Jill Nagamine "egregiously misrepresents the case and the law." But nowhere does Orly even try to point out the tiniest example of where Nagamine misrepresents anything.

Orly whines about Nagamine's husband representing Maya Soetoro-Ng in an uncontested divorce 16 years ago. There is no conceivable stretch by any legal imagination that would represent a conflict of interests with her job as Assistant Attorney General today. Yawn.

Orly whines about not getting a copy of the court transcript yet. I gotta tell you, in three years of Orly watching, I've never once seen her successfully follow a single court rule in any jurisdiction she has tried to practice in. Her incompetence is entirely her problem (and that of her flying monkeys who she always seems to beg to do her job for her).

Orly whines about a "Channel 8 reporter" who is not a reporter at all, but a guy who buys time on the local Honolulu Public Access Chanel. The court did not limit it to one camera, the court granted camera access to the only Station that asked. Why would they share it with some random guy off the street?

So where is this "misrepresentation" by the Attorney General? Orly doesn't even try. She wouldn't recognize the law (let alone its "misrepresentation") if it bit her on the ass.

Orly is simply and without peer the worst.... lawyer.... evar!

 

i don't wonder why i'm mocked rahlwong... do you ??

 

why would someone have to buy time at a public access channel wongrahl ?

 

Um, what? That's how public access works. Anyone who buys time gets to put their show on.

 

I know exactly why you're mocked. it's the willfull detatchment from reality that you place yourself in. because after having reality explained to you , over and over and over again, and you still parrotting birther idiocy, it is more than simple ignorance......it's willfull ignorance.

 

i thought it was free access, how much are they charging for public access ??