SCOTUS reject Jack Smiths request for justices to hear Trump immunity dispute

So now its asking you a question

Means I stated he did.
Anything else you want to take out of context just to make another claim?

 

He said it, I didn’t say he did it. You arguing it’s ok to promise fascism so long as you’re a liar?

 

I don’t follow that word salad. It was a yea or no.

 

So you didn't claim LITERALLY stated he’d lock up his opponent last time …not investigate her, not charge her, but lock her up

I'd run from that post as well

 

Why are we always arguing over something nobody said??
I said he ran around saying he’d lock her up. And that’s what he did. Wth lol

 

So someone else used your computer to post this

Which you clearly stated he was going to lock her up without an investigation or charge her, just lock her up.
But you didn't post that.
Yeah, Ok

 

No I said he said he would. I knew he was full of ****.

 

The only people trying to lock up political opponents are the left.

 

Only one guy promised to, and he’s doing it again

 

False. Several dems have said they would.

and yet only the left is actually doing it

 

Right.

 

Already addressed that. Again, objectively speaking, the left are the ones actually trying.

 

And did he do it?
The left is actually doing everything they can to hijack the legal system to actually make it happen instead of simply talking about it on the campaign trail.