Search in George Zimmerman case turns up weapons, ammunition

I haven't made any threats. I just pointed out the reality that if conservatives were to ever get savage, things would end up really ugly for them. That's not a threat, it's the truth.

But as I said before, some people have to learn the hard way

- - - Updated - - -

Reality has never been a conservative strong suit.

However, when 2016 rolls around, reality will smack them in their faces, and I'll be laughing when it happens.

 

Romney by a land slide.

The 2010 house victories were a rejection of Liberalism by the American people.

If Obama wins a second term, he'll start impementing socialism.

Unemployment will never get back below 8% because of fears about Obama's economic policies.

If we leave Iraq, the region will descend into chaos that spills over into Saudi Arabia, and jeapordize our oil supply.

.......anyone else feel free tio chime in with all the other ones I forgot at this moment....

 

There is a huge difference between being "correct", and getting lucky...or just parrotting what the defense lawyers say and quoting smart people....and of course, just getting lucky that way

The only thing you brought to that table was hatred, and just got lucky about all the rest.

 

That's what happens when human beings lose the ones they love, and I wouldn't expect you to understand

Not anywhere near as much as you think. I fact, I can't remember any instance where you were correct

 

Pretty sure she said that Zimmerman would not be convicted. In the grand scheme of things, thats pretty much all that matters.

 

Yes there was as the preponderance of the evidence proved.

The evidence was overwhelming that Martin assaulted Zimmerman.

He was not convicted because the evidence was overwhelming that Martin assaulted him and was threatening him with serious bodily harm or death.

That he acted in self-defense was proven and all your baseless assertions about what occurred that night were summarily dismissed.

- - - Updated - - -

No problem at all about it. He was a neighborhood watch member and doing exactly what neighborhood watch people do. WATCH.

 

Why would he be in prison for defending his life and body had the person assaulting him been white?

 

Why would those who corrected read the evidence and determine he acted in self defense that night have egg on their face? The only eggs on faces are on the faces of those who jumped to conclusions and said he committed murder and then watched as all their phony assertions went down the toilets at trial.

 

Nope get your facts straight and even if so would be an illegal discharge of a firearm.

People don't go to jail simply because you hate them, they have to commit a crime. The evidence was overwhelming that he did not commit a crime and all your phony assertions otherwise went down the toilet at trial.

May or may not, but has nothing to do with the events that night and we don't put people in jail because you think the might commit a crime later in life.

His "destiny" took a radical turn that night and when those of your position in this matter started threatening him and his family not only with harm but with death. I can't imagine what he must be going through mentally the way you and others have vilified him for simply protection his own life and body during a felony assault that as being committed on him.

 

Because he proved it was self-defense. There was no doubt he killed Marin, it was an affirmative defense where he proved his innocence of committing a crime in the killing.

 

If you want to give someone credit for guessing Auburn would have beat Alabama this weekend, they'd have really just gotten lucky, and that what his guess about the Zimmerman trial was all about...luck

The only person alive who didn't guess was Zimmerman

 

They didn't prove his innocence...the defense simply didn't present evidence that would cause the jury to find him guilty.

I'm shocked that you would engage in sheer specualtion regarding his "innocence", and present it as proof. You're slipping in your old age.

 

Yes they did. it was an affirmative defense. He admitted he killed Martin and he proved it was self-defense even though he had no burden of proof, the state could not prove otherwise.

 

Yeah, I knew Auburn was going to win but thats probably a topic for a sports forum. The fact is, he was found not guilty by a jury of your peers that actually listened and paid attention, I mean you cant dispute that can you? God, it was so wonderful to hear that not guilty verdict, made all those months following it worth it. Its a good feeling.

 

"An "affirmative defense" simply names the category of defense by which the defendent was acquitted. It makes people found "not guilty" no more "innocent" than any other category.

That didn't "prove" what happened was "self defense, because Zimmerman could have simply lied about key points that were introduced at the trial

Let me fix your post

That's better!...it also supports the concept that charges should never have been filed. Whaddya think of that?!

 

I love seeing people cry while they breathlessly try to scream "roll tide roll"

You're too emotionally involved to have been a good juror.

You may have felt good about that day, but I'm sure it balanced out with The SCOTUS upholding Obamacare, and Obama's victory in 2012, and the fact that we're not all socialists now.

You have a lot more things to be bumed about that be happy about as a righty right now. Hope it changes for you. I'm looking forward to criticizing you for supporting everything the government does, and all the money they spend, when the GOP is back in 2016.

 

But all this was already known before the race-baiting mainstream media and Barack Obama forced Florida -- against the state's better judgment -- to bring Zimmerman to trial. The prosecution went into it knowing that they could not win.

 

It's not Obama's fault, it's the Sanford county DA that caved instead of stating they didn't have the evidence. Obama never called for Zimmerman's conviction. He only called for "justice". It's not his fault that Martin supporters thought that meant prosecute Zimmerman with, or without compelling evidence. The Sanford DA's office never told the DOJ or the white house that they didn't have evidence. And all this has to be balanced with the implications of NOT trying Zimmerman, and nobody can know what that would have been, because that didn't happen.

I'm quite more than certain if Martin was a 17 year old blonde white girl, and Zimmerman a 29 year old black man, and Bush was still President...all roles would be reversed exactly 100%

 

Yeah it's Obama's fault and that of the race-baiting mainstream media. The Sanford D.A. was caught between a rock and a hard place . . . Florida's justice system which was very clear about the amount of available evidence and the existing testimony versus a President who very publicly took sides. Sure the D.A. should have told the president and his media lap dogs to, "Get Stuffed!" but that rather along the lines of blaming the Japanese for not being able to hold back the tsunami from their nuclear reactor. Power will out . . . and Obama -- with his abuse of office -- held that power.

 

A call for "justice" from the top law of the land after saying that Martin could be his son? What would you do?

 

I never would have made it on the jury, I totally would have let everyone know what scumbags I think the parents, Bernie and Angela were, it would have made better tv than Rachels testimony.

 

Don't hate me because I am correct. I have been correct since the beginning. I tried to explain it but the hate against George was too much for reality to overcome delusion. There I go again, being correct.

- - - Updated - - -

"Losing someone they love"? Are you talking about the real trayvon or the fictional cartoon character created to perpetrate this racial hoax?

I guess you need to pay closer attention.

 

The far right wing conservatives have destroyed the Republican Party, and they can thank Nixon and that loser Reagan for that.

I still maintain that if the Repubs do what the dems did back in the 1960's and reject these losers, they can save their party. I suspect if they lose in 2016, they will do it.

 

Jibberish is bad enough but off topic jibberish is even worse.

 

How sad that some are still in denial. Oh well.