I admitted nothing. But I do have a newsflash for you: it's the internet, skippy. Nobody wins and nobody loses. And even if you're that confident that you've won, who honestly cares? Your "study" is 16 effing years old, long since outdated and my "study" was from 2 years ago. You refuse to show the entirety of your study on the grounds that it would "break copyright," and that it's a closed-source study, well I can play that game as well. It just goes to show how evidentiary standards are measured on the internet. You lose.
I'm not going to waste any more time on you and your spamming. I leave with a smile though as you've been so easily manipulated into admitting that you haven't got the means to counter the sexism charge. Cheers!
Yeah let's see how long that statement of yours sticks true this time you make it. You already said that once--if not twice--prior. The sexism charge doesn't even need to be countered, as sufficient evidence hasn't been shown supporting it to begin with. And I admitted nothing, your "leaving with a smile" attitude is nothing short of delusional.
