Much like you in that regard. 95 posts eh? The mods must be feeling generous. I'm sure they'll be along to clean out the smelly sock drawer in short order though.
Actually, the sky isn't blue. It's painted white and grey with chemclouds. You should try looking up on occasion.
Another example of the truther tactic (i.e. temper tantrum) of taking a claim to the extreme. According to truthers, if you don't believe in the retarded theory of chem-trails, then you obviously don't believe in any part of the field of geo-engineering. A pathetic attempt at best and complete dishonesty at worst.
Dishonesty? Surely you jest. Look up sometime and be honest. (or just accept whatever it is you don't see). Knock yourself out and enjoy (or don't).
Chemtrail conspiracy has something to do with 9/11? This is news to me. Tell me about this shocking new 9/11 discovery acquired by looking up honestly, RWF. Otherwise I think we're witnessing a different truther argumentative tactic, namely the off topic tangent distraction technique.
Why would I jest? Is it not dishonest to claim someone doesn't believe an entire field of science because they don't believe the retarded claims of a bunch of whackjobs who can't back up their own retarded claims? If you think that is honest, I would love to hear your justification.
I am new to this forum and not a truther, and I want to believe in the official stories of 911. However there is a good argument on both sides I think. I have looked at truthers in the past as wackos. But reading the posts in this forum I am tending to think you and others like you must be professional bloggers to debunk or complete idiots. To say there is no spraying in the sky is ludicrous. Grid patterns and lines. I am leaning towards geo-engineering but also satellite blinding is a very plausible theory at times also. I think they are both happening. But that is my opinion. But for you to completely dismiss it as fantasy. I am really starting to lean towards the truthers.
Do you ever see the lines in the sky? Forget the geo-engineering. How about the satellite blinding theory? Does that make any sense to you?
Wow. I just asked if he sees the lines in the sky. I do, I don't believe they are contrails. Just my opinion.
And I just noticed your same opening lines in a couple of different forum sections. Pretending to be totally new yet seeming to have quite a bit of background on the subject. Pretty "sockish" if you ask me.
Now I am being stalked. Oh boy. I am new here and have not read the entire threads. So maybe my questions have already been addressed. That was my point. I did not want to be extremely redundant. So Do you see the lines?
So noticing that you use the same disingenuous opening in more than one thread and pointing out that fraudulent behavior is stalking?
Fraudulent behavior? What.. This is how you address my questions by attacking my character. That's convenient.
As opposed to the truthtard tactic of sock puppets. They always follow the same line of reasoning too. "I was always on the fence until I saw the truthers here kick ass and prove everything! Now I am a truther and I believe every conspiracy including chemtrails!" Just shows truthers have no imagination.