Bestiality is not raping animals. I am sure there are animals that would consent at the right time by their response. You're just confused because they don't give you "verbal consent". Tell you what you think is next......your values are right and others are wrong, so we are to submit to your values because you believe they are right and others have no say. Not happenin' bro! Stick to education. Values are taught at home!
Homosexuality is an abnormal behavior. It is also an unfruitful and selfish behavior (only "good" for one's self pleasure).
Abnormal =/= bad. Green eyes are abnormal. And having a snack is "unfruitful and selfish behavior (only "good" for one's self pleasure). Also, if you think that the only way to have sex is when you are doing it for your own self pleasure to the exclusion of others, I feel bad for your partner.
Never said it did. All it means is that homosexuality is a deviation from ("ab") the pattern/rule/standard ("normal"), which in this case is the male/female reproductive process. I'm not sure how one would define "normal" here... There are most certainly eye colors that are more common than others, with green being the least common. Having a snack is fruitful. It provides fuel for one's body. I don't think that, therefore your point is moot.
I thought this was an anti-grooming bill that has nothing to do with gay. Or straight. Or fluid. For instance, I don't think teachers would be able to talk about BDSM with a 5 year old even if it refers to straights doing it. Just, any conversation that starts with a relative stranger (such as teachers and school admin) telling your 5 year old, "now, don't tell mommy" sounds like a bad one.
You think it should be!?!?!?!?! EDIT: Just sorta kidding. Been some time since that French newspaper cover with a little boy felating a man with the headline, "we must learn them to love". But never mind BDSM. How about just straight marital sex? I bet that is discussed with 5 year olds. They should knock it off.
No. I've answered your question, so why do you refuse to answer mine, especially since I asked you first? Sorry, but this just doesn't look like an honest concern.
I did also stating, (and 7 min. later you clipped)... "Just sorta kidding. Been some time since that French newspaper cover with a little boy felating a man with the headline, "we must learn them to love". But never mind BDSM. How about just straight marital sex? I bet that is discussed with 5 year olds. They should knock it off." Emphasis added.
What city was burned down? And I also see how me criticizing your homophobia is somehow connecting to claiming I support "vandalize businesses and burn down cities". That's just weird coming from a person who got things in common with people who toss gays from buildings.
Several areas of several cities were set on fire during the lawless BLM riots of 2020 (Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, and Kenosha to name a few). None of them literally burned down to the ground in their entirety. And I also see how me criticizing your conservaphobia is somehow connecting to claiming I support "toss[ing] homosexuals from buildings". That's just weird coming from a person who got things in common with people who vandalize businesses and burn down cities. See how that works? Two can play that game.
God forbid we should be chaste, virtuous, get married and have children in stable homes, and work and provide for ourselves. Is it better to be a nation of reprobate drunken pirates, engaged in all manner of debauchery.
Ah! There is still a kind of shadow area for science: the birth of the fundamental forces. There was something called "spontaneous symmetry breaking". Spontaneous? According to which physical law? Probably there was a will at work ... [Just to say, as for I can remember, in classical quantum mechanics the tunnel effect would make a SSB impossible]. It's like the process of inflation: why did it happen? And overall: where is the anti-matter? Why did matter win in our universe? Theoretically, starting from a no dimensional point, the universe had to generate 50% of matter and 50% of anti-matter. This is not to sustain that God exists, but that we have to still work a bit to exclude a divine creation.
That argument only works if you can prove heterosexual people only have sex for the purpose of procreation. I'll wait. /smdh
Most people try very hard to not make a baby when they have sex most of the time. Catholics used to believe any form of birth control was a sin. A sect of the Shakers used to have sex through a hole in a sheet so their bodies would touch as little as possible. And you only had sex to make babies. Religion: Hell bent on destroying the joy in life at every turn.
Or remotely close LOL! What a load a crap!!! A few buildings were burned. You know it's a sin to lie, right? What is it god said about the lukewarm believers - you know, all talk and no show. He will vomit them out of his mouth
Exactly. Many still do. I was raised Catholic. I am the only one in the family that didn't judge my gay cousin. US Americans want to act all pious but look at the way we treat our women. The hypocrisy is appalling. And, pick people's pockets.
