This is exactly what I was saying. No matter if you set the age limit at 65, teens will manage to get their hands on it and if they are receptive to nicotine they will become smokers. I am not sure the decreasing amount of smokers is to be credited to restrictions. Maybe the kids are doing other stuff instead; what about alcohol consumption? What about sex? Or other drugs? Increase or decrease? I think this has a lot to do with receptiveness more than anything else. Maybe children of today, for somr reason, are less receptive for some reason? My brother used to smoke, but he never caught an addiction. He bought a pack of cigs every now and again, but could go without it for months and months to then start again. Sometimes the package just sat untouched on the shelf.
Norwegian Public Service did a nice documentary series a couple of years where one of the episodes [1] kind of touched upon this question. All episodes are really interesting and I recommend all to watch them. [1]https://m.youtube.com/watch?list=PLd9_g7lAICxtlGbxh4_z8ik178o8CDPnv&v=DMdE3EsOafY (One of the episodes is missing on the playlist because it is about the controversial topic on race. But it is out to find on other Youtube channels.)
An this does not at times apply to main stream movies? See the couching bed claims in the bios of females move stars for the last 100 years or so.
Regular movies are not the same as pornography! Hello? - - - Updated - - - People in movies are not ACTUALLY having sex!!! Good grief!
Sure. That is great and helps, but it does not fully stop anyone underaged from getting their hands on their addiction. I remember a few years ago when some clearly underaged girls asked me if I could go into rhe store and buy them cigarettes. Up until today I still regret I didn't take their money, pretended I was going in, but instead walk away. Lol. Or step into the store and come out with a bag of candy, eating it infront of them. That would have taught them a good lesson. Obviously, I just told them to spend their money on ice cream and walked away. I am way off topic. Sorry.
My point completely an as the internet is world wide you hardly even need access to the darknet as one nation or a groups of nations laws do not apply world wide.
Would you care to proved that statement as there is a whole fairly large sub-culture of S & M couples many of them in long term marriages or relationships
I have a question to those that think porn should be illegal. What about porn that is just stories? Written Porn no pictures.
I guess we will need to break up marriages and arrest at least the males who are part of SM couples whenever possible as no matter what a woman will state she is surely not taking part willingly. At least in your world view. Footnote does this apply to gay couples also?
She figured out that her beauty wouldn't last forever, so she hitched her wagon to a meal ticket so she could maintain her lifestyle. I understand why she did it, but that put her in the same category as prostitute to me.
That's true of a lot of women, unfortunately. The majority of women who aren't with rich guys aren't with them because they aren't hot enough, not because they don't want them. One of these days, I'd like to see a study of highly attractive women and the average income of their partner.
7 billion people on Earth. Would be hard and probably there is no correlation at all between "hot woman" and "rich man".
This is just Ricky being insecure. - - - Updated - - - You are just being silly now. If you want to have a serious discussion, then by all means. There is no correlation between pornography and marriages where both parties are consenting. - - - Updated - - - Go back and read the stories I posted in the last couple of pages.
Authorities are already sniffing or Internet connections, it is no secret. But would any of you really be willing to give up parts of your privacy by allowing the state even greater access to your Internet-traffic just so that consumers of violent porn could be taken down? I say no friggen way. Regulating the business is not going to help. When the government realises the problem still is persistent, they will implement even heavier regulations and eventually we will end up with a Super-Panopticon where even typing on a forum thread like this could be interpreted as "consuming porn."
