Ok, so explain it then. If the NIST didn't and you can then why are you so afraid? Why do you run like a child everytime you're asked? It's because, just like Holston, you're lying. You have no idea what those pictures are supposed to mean or why you consider them suspicious. Anyone would have taken the opportunity to explain what it going on, and why. Yet, you haven't. You might think you're really pulling one over on everyone, but you're not. It's clear that you are avoiding answering the question because you just straight up don't know. I don't get why you can't just admit it.
you dont have enough silly baiting antics in your bag to get me to post anything until you prove up that report. I am getting old and gray
no not really. you already admitted in the pissed off american thread that NIST never addressed all the steel.
if you are not able to follow the flow of the discussion may you should asks one of your debunker friends for some help
You keep talking in circles, bumping into your own rhetoric and getting dizzy, Jojo. Your lack of evidence is still amusing.
I didn't admit anything, I gave a scenario. I told you I digress and asked for your explanation to what happened with the steel. You've run and hid.
....and you carefully steer those circles even more circular, insuring they stay circular. Years of circular rhetoric has its payoffs though I suppose. Traffic is down quite a bit on this topic.....a tribute to the fine leadership here...no doubt. That's pretty amusing as well.
As a reminder Seriously, how did I miss that? I've been away for too long. Awesome quote Fraud, thanks for the lulz.
Yes, hucksters like Gage and Jones keep milking the truther lemmings dry. Not a single truther can pick a topic, stick to it and support their claims. Your claim that no one died on 9/11, for example.
Such complete gibberish makes me torn between lulz and disgust. (It doesn't help Fraud insists on labeling himself a leftist in his sig. , making real leftists like myself want to throw up). However, in the interest of fair play(or something), instead of raging incoherently or posting snark, I have started a thread where "truthers" like 'Fraud can share their "evidence" that "no one died on 9/11". http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/284417-no-one-died-wtc-9-11-post-evidence.html#post1062171038 As bat(*)(*)(*)(*) insane this "theory" is, it's a peeve of mine. After reading reams of cult accounts on Snopes and similar websites, this idea sounds like it had it's origins in some cult org....maybe if the people who fell for it share what makes them think that, it'll be obvious where this bs started.
I don't actually recall making that statement, and IF I did, then I was grossly in error. Now you and the Boss can accept that or continue with your circular rhetoric. Keep on referencing it though..please...it'll give me an opportunity to point out your circular rhetoric at the same time. You folks are doing a fine, fine job here, I have to admit, effectively squelching truth with rhetoric. It'd be admirable if it weren't so disgustingly evil.
I label myself as a "leftist" in my sig? REALLY? Show me. I haven't seen you here before and I noticed the Boss and a couple other "regulars" are absent of late (due to their circular success I guess). Are you the relief? - - - Updated - - - Your obsession with me on that point is amusing. Keep up the good work.
I could be making an incorrect assumption; your sig "tax the rich" is more often associated with left/progressive politics. You have also been critical of the right at other times in the forum, highlighting the impression you wish to associate yourself with left/progressive politics. If, I'm incorrect, I apologize, but that's what it looked like. Sounds like the onset of dementia. You have only to look at my posting history in my profile. This thread might jog your memory: http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/234078-hoodwinked-shanksville-14.html I'm not a newbie, but I have this thing called a life. Ergo the less than 1000 forum posts. Drat. You caught me. When your profound intellect was clearly too much for my fellow shills to battle, Hannibal got on the Emergency Shill Hotline and called me ASAP. I was touching up the final details of our Fake Sandy Hook extended relatives photoshop album, but dropped everything, because suppressing the Truth on this board is too crucial to our New World Order Zionist Reptile Satanic Jew Take Over Plans(we're working on a catching acronym). But you saw through our ruse. Curses, foiled again! - - - Updated - - - Or follow this one: http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/284417-no-one-died-wtc-9-11-post-evidence.html
I posted no such thing. That's what the Boss want you to think though. Use your intellect here and you'll figure out who and why.
The link is fabricated. It asks for my id and password but won't let me sign in. Was this an attempt to get my password? I think the mods need to investigate these falsehoods and bar a certain someone for impersonating someone. You 're really going to quite a bit of work to paint me in a false light. Very admirable, if I admired paid disinformation hacks.
We've done the homework. There is nothing of forensic signifance that I, a trained arson and aircraft crash investigator, can see that is the least bit odd, after you allow for the fact that a bunch of deranged kamikaze terrorists drove airplanes into the sides of the buildings and made them fall down.
What do you mean by "account for all the steel?" Are you saying some is missing or that it is not explained to your satifaction? I see nothing here that needs to be expalined in any great detail. It all looks like what I would expect to pull out of the rubble pile in the timeframe given. you have nothing, zippo nada oh and btw if you want to get into proper evidentiary process hell yah I will go there with you! Is the manure lagoon about to overflow from AE911T?
Anyone who expects this crash site to look the least bit like Shanksville is utterly ignorant of aircraft crashes, geology or ditch digging. This crash appears to involve a more oblique angle than did that at Shanksville. This crash scene is on the side of a freaking LIMESTONE hill. The scene at Shannksville was in relatively new land fill, closely resembling, and thus given to acting like glacial till. (Google it if you need to.) I'm old and arthritic, and could easily beat stamped steel fence posts into that sort of soil that was found at Shanksville. Most state OSHA regs would require you to put a casing in any ditch that you plan to dig more than knee-deep into that because it collapses so easily into the trench. You could dig in it with an ordinary pick and shovel, maybe with just the shovel. At the Rivera crash scene, many a good man would be beaten half goofy operating a jack hammer to dig a trench that an infantryman would feel safe to use as a rifle trench. He wouldn't need a casing to keep the sides from collapsing. That stone is firmly fixed to where it is. You have basicly sod all here.
It sounds exactly like something you would write, and I suspect it was saved from PF's mirrored site when they are doing maintenence. For posterity yo. http://www.politicalforum.com/attac...9-11-post-evidence-rghtwingfraudnoonedied.jpg
