Discussion in '9/11' started by ar10, Dec 12, 2012.
You must have been world class at dodge-ball,fraud...
Thats still a dodge Fraud. My god, I only ask that you provide a shred of evidence to back your claim up. You claim the picture in question is invalid/fake/stagged, so and I ask you to prove it.
Almost 10 dodges now, all hot air and no substance.
There being only one, you have no basis on which to say that it looks wrong.
You must have been world class at the lemming walk, lone.
I'm not the one refusing to answer a simple question,fraud..
You'll never get a 'truther' to show evidence or a source.
It's like arguing with a racist who say he isn't racist. Kinda pointless. (that's an analogy...not literal).
Yes it is pointless to argue with a liar who claims he's not a liar (also a <koff> an analogy)
Exactly! The 'team" concept. You got it.
The 'truther' team continues to lack evidence.
The paid disinformation team continues to bob and weave away from truth.
We know them as 'truthers'.
Seeing as after a dozen pages you are yet to provide a shred of evidence to invalidate the evidence from shanksville, it seems you are the one who desperately continues to 'bob and weave' away from everything.
Prove it,or stop saying it....
It's another thing they can't prove, but will keep lying about. It feeds their need for attention as well as their paranoia.
See my signature abut the pet running into walls.
What EVIDENCE? There isn't any.
I don't engage shills. I thought you got that. Apparently not.
Good of you to admit it.
Do we really have to go over this again?
I provided a US courts verified picture of UA93's engine being excavated from the crash site.
I asked you to provide evidence to invalidate it. You have not. Therefore, your theory is null and void, unless you can provide evidence the image in invalid.
Sorry, but you do not get to disinform the casual visitor like that without being challenged. There was evidence from day one, when the news helicopters were still circling over the airplane-shaped hole that could have been made by no other means known to man.
You have made the counter-intuitive statement, so the burden of proof is on you.
Oh yeah...that missile hole. No, I did see it. Didn't look much like a plane. That is where they claim it was buried 30 feet though, you're correct there. "Casual visitor". Strange you felt it necessary to highlight that tidbit. Let's see....who's missing here? Oh.....I just noticed.
Who claims the whole plane was buried? Oh, yeah ... ignorant truthers.
We've been over this. First it WAS buried...then it wasn't. I guess we're back to "it wasn't".
Why can't PART of it be buried,genius?
Only 'truthers' made that claim. Especially Killtown and his lemming followers.
So what percentage was buried (hidden from independent verification), and what percentage WASN'T buried that was apparently ALSO hidden...where? Above ground?
Somebody can show my non doctored pics of them digging out the buried 93, then, I'll yield to your interpretation of events. I need more than the one piece of rusty something next to the backhoe. Something a bit more conclusive.I just want to see proof. I've seen none.
Separate names with a comma.