...the Pentagon tapes? Why haven't we seen the full video? And why haven't we seen the videos from collaborating sources? And I Googled FOIA requests. There seems to be controversy over that too.
The story of the Pentagon tapes can be found here: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/FBI_hides_84_Pentagon_videos
They've confiscated a great number of videos (83 or so I believe). None of them show any plane hitting the Pentagon. I'm beginning to believe them They probably DON'T have anything showing such an act. Cause....IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
If the tapes don't show anything, why withhold them in the first place? Besides, shouldn't outside sources determine whether or not the tapes are necessary for the investigation, i.e. the general public, not the FBI? Too much secrecy and "you need to take our word for it" for my blood.
Read the link and do a tiny bit of research. The tapes have been returned and thir contents revealed via FOIA.
[video=youtube;QOa3k_msQWc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOa3k_msQWc[/video] What is that hitting the Pentagon?
Here's some stuff I've already posted about the Pentagon. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-plane-flew-over-pentagon.html#post1060818311 Post #1 of this thread has some stuff about the Pentagon. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746
Watch this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8 BTW, whats up with you? You use to claim you didn't believe the government was behind the attacks and now you appear to be buying into the theories. I've seen the theories. They're not that compelling.
At the risk of being accused of creating a straw man here but . . . do you propose that we do away with the FBI and just have the general public investigate things that are normally investigated by the FBI? Or have the general public decide what is necessary for the FBI to use in investigations? If your point here is that the government is so corrupt that the FBI can't be trusted than who will you trust to choose which members of the general public get to decide these matters?
No...you said Flight 77 is in the photo. Then you ducked answering his followup question, and where it would ultimately lead. "Running" is what I think your team mates call it.
Wrong....he was asked what hit the pentagon,and he answered 'flight 77',nothing was said about seeing that on a photo.
I saw a blur and a fireball. Same as you did. The video is not the only evidence, but it does fit with the rest.
Something isn't adding up here, Hannibal. I am supposed to believe that that is a Boeing 757, right? One question, how tall is a Boeing 757?
