Stories of Jesus or 'saying' of Jesus; which is better?

So you fault the Codex because it has accurate bookkeeping? That's ridiculous! A lack of commentary in the NH does not mean it HASN'T had years of what you call "editing"--it just means it hasn't been as carefully observed. I think it rather makes it more suspect.

It is my opinion that there are many errors in the KJV far more egregious than adding the name "Jesus" where it is clearly indicated, so... But, at any rate...the verses are the same in meaning across the texts...what is your point?

You could?

I have answered it directly.

 

i didnt fault it for bookkeeping. but it the record keeping was in error centuries before the recording of the initial entry, i would question the integrity of the books across the board.

wow..........

you just will not deal straight will you

i never said they were not

i was asking if the material made sense as sayings, versus stories


you simply discount them because your religious leadership dont accept them.


but as for the 'dating' there has been numerous upon them and the dead sea scrolls




It is my opinion that there are many errors in the KJV far more egregious than adding the name "Jesus" where it is clearly indicated, so... But, at any rate...the verses are the same in meaning across the texts...what is your point?


You could?



I have answered it directly.[/QUOTE]

 

Did you see God in your TV? or was God seeing you in the TV?