Texas woman charged with threatening to kill judge overseeing Trump’s federal election interference

You must not get around this forum much and I suppose you've never heard of a poster who goes by the handle of Andrew Jackson.

 

You think that every poster here is representative of the Left or the Right?

LOL.

Weak sauce.

 

Well now you have heard of something that you claim that you never heard of here.

Go ahead and ask him about Andy Ngo having been assaulted by leftist on multiple occasions

 

Good eye there LU.
Outta the same gene pool for sure.

 

I do?

Deflect much?

The fact that you can't bring yourself to condemn this says all that needs to be said.

 

Yes. Both sides.

If you don't agree, your one of the ones I'm talking about.

 

right after Trump is charged for his 2nd amendment threat against Hillary

 

here was her threat

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/politics/texas-woman-charged-threat-judge-chutkan/index.html

"“If Trump doesn’t get elected in 2024, we are coming to kill you, so tread lightly, b*tch,” Shry said in the message, according to the complaint. “You are in our sights, we want to kill you.”"

 

And she confessed to DHS investigators.

 

It's been posted by me, and so many others, endlessly. I fail to see why, just now, your forgot....

 

No? So when that guy showed up with a gun from CA to attack Kavanaugh, that was just coincidence you say?? Ok. So, if that's the road you want to go, explain how then any speech by anyone ever could be the switch that caused violence, including J6. You only get this one way. And if you demand that speech causes crime/violence, then you have to be consistent. if you're not, you're demonstrating the idea that every person in this country now sees that democrats insist on a double standard, but only for them.

 

Really... sure it was. Just like when he said that if Trump wasn't careful, they would send the intel agencies after him, and gosh, that happened, didn't it. If you accept that it could be a poor choice of words when Chuck says something, the same standard has to apply to all, no? Sorry, Chuck doesn't get a pass for demanding folks do violence against two SCOTUS judges.

 

Swing away.

 

I'm not defending Schumer. My point is that Schumer's remarks did not include phrases like "I'll kill you." "Reap the whirlwind" literally means "suffer serious consequences as a result of one's actions." This woman directly threatened to kill a federal judge. Please tell me you understand the difference.

This type of threat, directed at those who run afoul of "dear leader," has become all too common among Trump's supporters. Just ask Ruby Freeman.

 

I am most definitely NOT defending Schumer. Just pointing out the weakness of that bit of whataboutism in the face of actual death threats.

 

Name an equivalent threat that "the left" blamed on "the right." Sorry, but you don't get to just make stuff up.

 

"Real the whirlwind" is no the equivalent to "I'll kill you."

Using Schumer as a whataboutism here is really reaching. An ass he may be, but he didn't threaten anyone's life.

 

So, which part of "Schumer had the grace to apologize and clarify" or "There is no Democratic equivalent to the violence-prone MAGA contingent" do you need me to explain?

The die-hard MAGA contingent has been threatening everyone Trump speaks out against since 2015. Why are you okay with that?

 

I do hope they raid the home, for the sake to take all the guns away.
Society isn't safe when a racist indoctrinated alcoholic goes so far as threatening to kill a judge.
And there needs to be taps placed on friends and family, so see who are also in on this.
"see something say something" didn't produce this arrest.

 

I think rounding up her friends is a few steps too far. I have no doubt her friends a share her views. In fact I strongly believe that a large percentage of conservatives (at least 20%) agree with her. But I don’t believe in arresting anyone until they act on their beliefs or threaten to do so.

 

The friends and family should get taps, to see if they are in on this. And if there is evidence, than they should simply get arrested / convicted and so lose their gun privileges. A raid of their home than becomes necessary to find them weapons.

Let's not kid ourselves about what we're dealing with. These are terrorists.

 

I honestly don’t know much about the requisite cause to get a wire tap but I would be shocked if there’s enough cause here to put taps on her family members.

 

Predictable MAGA deflection.

 

If you just assume that they 100% believe everything they say it is much easier. Trying to work out which statements are trolling or 'acting stupid is clever in MAGAworld' isn't worth the time investment. Just take them at face value and treat them accordingly.

 

Does the mental image of Kathy Griffin holding up the severed bloody head of President Trump escape the memory this soon?

How about Snoop Dogg's mock assassination? About Madonna threatening to blow up the White House?

How fast all of that goes down the progressive memory hole