The 2020 Election wasn’t Stolen, it was Bought by Mark Zuckerberg

I agree....buttigieg should not be on leave for more than a few days for the arrival of his child..

he will have plenty of time to be daddy after he is replaced as transportation secretary

but reporting this is NOT propaganda..he is on leave ..and getting paid to boot

it should be and is being reported

it is also being reported he is doing the required duties of his position from home

the people most concerned with buttigieg also had no problem taking the week off of january 6th to protest the election results

nobody reported how many people on january 6th were on paid leave

and nobody cared ...especially the people getting paid

 

How many months did you say they were off?

 

yip.. teh reason you've not heard of the evidence of the stolen election

https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/29/wi-sheriff-ag-refused-election-crime-evidence-in-march/

 

Everyone knows nothing is fraud proof.

But the rules make it hard. Punishment is steep, fraud is on the order of 0.00004%.

 

No story out of Wi about a stolen election.

 

There were 51 "popular votes" Trump won 30 of them Hillary won 21. There is not one big national election.

 

And in 2016 the control of the Virginia state house came down to a tie. They had to flip a coin. This is going to be a very close election. So what's your point?

We already see the Dems trying to change the election rules after the voting has started by getting rid of one of the ballot protections and now posting false ads and engaged in false flags. I put nothing past them.

 

That is just part of the big lie

 

I said

And in 2016 the control of the Virginia state house came down to a tie. They had to flip a coin. This is going to be a very close election. So what's your point?

We already see the Dems trying to change the election rules after the voting has started by getting rid of one of the ballot protections and now posting false ads and engaged in false flags. I put nothing past them.

What part of that is part of this big lie?

 

Ballot protection.

 

There is a whole thread on the Dems wanting to now drop the witness signatures on absentee ballots.

Virginia Dems Push To Ditch Witness Requirement For Absentee Ballots As Youngkin Gains Ground
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...youngkin-gains-ground.593433/#post-1073017817

We already see the Dems trying to change the election rules after the voting has started by getting rid of one of the ballot protections and now posting false ads and engaged in false flags. I put nothing past them.

As I said

And in 2016 the control of the Virginia state house came down to a tie. They had to flip a coin. This is going to be a very close election. So what's your point about the .0004% number?

 

What threat was posed by having a witness signature?

 

It's rather obvious.

 

I don't know. What witness signature?

 

Obviously not.

I repeat the control of the State House in Virginia came down to a coin because the vote was a dead heat. So what is your point, not proven, about this .0004% The 2000 President race came down to just 538 votes out of the entire state Florida.

Why do you keep up this canard that voter fraud doesn't matter because it is not "widespread"? How "widespread" does it have to be in small towns around the country that have all sorts of close elections?

 

The one Democrats want to get rid of

 

It's obvious.

 

Where? When? How?

 

Virginia Dems press Northam to waive absentee ballot ...
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › virginia-dems-north...

Oct 7, 2021 — Democrats in Virginia are using the COVID-19 pandemic to press Gov. Ralph Northam to waive the witness signature requirement for mail-in ...

 

I don't see where it became law.
Did Northrup sign it?

 

https://trendingpolitics.com/breaki...ud-investigation-crugg/?utm_source=whatfingerhttps://trendingpolitics.com/breaki...ud-investigation-crugg/?utm_source=whatfinger

 

I asked him for you but he hasn't circled back yet.

 

So at this time. It's not a law.
Thx

 

You asked me what signature Democrats want to leave out and I told you. If they didn't want to get rid of that requirement they wouldn't have listed it. Make of it what you will but you might answer my question as to how that signature poses a threat to voting integrity since that was your position.

 

Likely the FIRST thing on The Carpetbagger's agenda when he's elected (yeah, I'VE abandoned all hope here in Godforsaken Virginia)....after all he has to grease the skids in preparation for 2022 AND 2024!