1. Slovakia. 2. Lithuania. 3. Czech Republic. Why are they all in East Europe? They maintain political party philosophies that are characteristic of 1930's racism/nazism. Shouldn't the EU intervene and rearrange/dissolve these countries already?
Cultural and linguistic oppression in the hope of keeping their ill-gotten territorial integrity. These 3 are agressors to assimilate others because their average citizens sold themselves out to their local state imperialism. In short: they want to cash in by robbing other people some more, instead of working.
only major Nazi party in Europe i know is Jobbik. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobbik Hitler would be proud
You will see much more of this in most EU countries as things get far worse and the screws really start to tighten .
Perhaps in this list it is necessary to replace Lithuania with Latvia. The country in which there are annual parades of former soldiers of Latvian legion SS.
This may be a good news if we consider that we could probably shake them up and normalize the map of East Europe then. The big question is, whether this would be in our western interest or against it.
It's always funny when someone talks about the border between Western Europe and Eastern Europe. Even more ridiculous than the statement "the interests of Western Europe in Eastern Europe." . In one word " EU as is"
I meant the individual borders of east European countries, not the "border" between western and eastern Europe.