I must be missing something. I can't see what your reply has to do with what I said. The theory that Arabs carried out the 9/11 attacks and that the governement knew it was going to happen and let it happen so they'd have a pretext to invade the Middle East has been shown to be wrong as all the evidence points to an inside job. http://able2know.org/topic/177268-1#post-4782975 To continue discussing whether the government looked the other way while Arabs did it is silly in view of all of the evidence of an inside job. Please explain what I'm missing here.
Is to general in terms. As I pointed out the "government" is made up of a lot of different pieces, most being overt in operation, within many of those operations, there are small covert operations. I doubt very much Prez Bush knew what was going to happen on that day. I suspect he knew something was in the works, that would allow U.S. military intervention in Iraq, to gain control of the country and it's leadership to negotiate oil deals, thus control the oil and the oil market.
Is to general in terms. As I pointed out the "government" is made up of a lot of different pieces, most being overt in operation, within many of those operations, there are small covert operations. I doubt very much Prez Bush knew what was going to happen on that day. I suspect he knew something was in the works.
Is to general in terms. As I pointed out the "government" is made up of a lot of different pieces, most being overt in operation, within many of those operations, there are small covert operations. I doubt very much Prez Bush knew what was going to happen on that day. I suspect he knew something was in the works.
Regardless of whether it was a controlled demolition or not, I think the CIA and the Bush administration had a pretty good idea that something was going to happen. I just find it ironic how Bush wasn't in the White House the day of 9/11. The fact that these people were trained to fly our planes by us shows that either the Bush administration and the CIA completely ignored everything (which I highly doubt), or the more likely scenario, the avoiding to take proper action in hopes of succeeding in a false flag operation.
Evidently what was in the works was an inside job. The proof is very clear. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/193865-disinformation-shills-27.html#post4735087 http://able2know.org/topic/177268-1#post-4782975 Anyone who doesn't think it's clear should watch this video. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4"]Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers - YouTube[/ame]
(sigh) It has nothing to do with cognitive dissonance. No matter how many times you post that link. The problem is that the theories put forth by the truthers don't make logical sense.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222 (excerpt) --------------------------------------------------------- 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. --------------------------------------------------------- The proof that 9/11 was an inside job is so clear that all you people can do is try to sway those who don't take the time to click on the links and look at the proof. I'd do the same in your place but you're fighting a losing battle. Once objective people actually look at the proof, there's nothing you can do to make them think 9/11 wasn't an inside job.
Yeah, I've seen that link before too. You trot it out when you can't answer questions that have been posed to you. It is a convenient stand by for you I'm sure. Too many holes in the alternative theories (or plausible scenarios as you call them) to believe. Given two plausible scenarios, one must decide which one is more plausible. It's funny that you talk about objective people looking at proof but you provide no proof. Just plausible scenarios.
