The Covid-19 Pandemic Does Not Exist

no you're not a customer to them it's just like Facebook you're the product. The customers are the people they sell ads to

Google is a dragon and dragons get slain. I remember about 15 years ago the world's biggest dragon for the us at least was a Walmart.

They still do pretty good but the dragon has been wounded and a larger dragon took its place.

 

Lol

 

They syphon data from you to build those ads specific to you, personalised ads.

 

Betamax101 is actually correct about Wagh. We can't seem to confirm her background & education.

I was intrigued with Wagh's interview because she sounded very knowledgeable and basically corroborated other whistleblowers (whose credentials & background could be verified). Whoever she is, she seems to have lab knowledge/experience.

Who knows. She may have been a lab tech who wanted to expose the truth about viruses & vaccines, but also wanted to inflate her credentials to get an audience. Or, she may be just an average, but well educated individual who wanted to jump on the anti-virus / anti-vax bandwagon. Or, she's a knowledgeable plant by big govt/corporatocracy set up as a means to monitor & later discredit the opposition.

Here is more info about Wagh:

Is Fuellmich Positioning to Prop Up Poornima Wagh?
https://moonmaiden.substack.com/p/is-fuellmich-positioning-to-prop

Who Is Poornima Wagh? And Why Is The "Press" Doing Such A Poor Job Vetting Stories?
https://starfirecodes.substack.com/p/who-is-poornima-wagh-and-why-is-the

The Sad Tale of Poornima Wagh
https://apocalypticyoga.substack.com/p/the-sad-tale-of-poornima-wagh

Poornima Wagh is an Imposter
https://apocalypticyoga.substack.com/p/poornima-wagh-is-a-fraud

Whatever the case may be, it makes no difference whatsoever what Wagh is or isn't. The truth still stands as it is: There is zero scientific confirmation for the existence of pathogenic/infectious viruses, which makes vaccines (and other 'anti-viral' treatments) nothing but dangerous poisons.

 

You got that right.

 

~ There is now the novel "spike protein" among us — introduced by the genius of Wuhan gain-of-function scientists and funded by $aint Fauci's NIH. It's not going away anytime soon ...

 

Spamming your crap?

 

After page 29 in the following document that was released to the public after a court order, you'll find 9 pages of adverse events documented by Pfizer. If only it wasn't true, but it is.

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

Did you get your booster?

 

It seems many people's perceptions of reality are there also.

 

~ Yet here you are again.

 

Must be learning something but doesn't want to admit it.

 

And you, which confirms my point.

 

Sadly that statement doesn't do what you think it does. The world is a gigantic sea of scientists all conspiring to kill people, or your views are in that very pit. Hmmm tough one that.

 

Unfortunately, your statement is invalid. It's not all scientists that want to kill everyone. Just those that are either too weak or spineless to question the very narrative and just state yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir to their globalist masters as opposed to those ones that are discredited and ridiculed for speaking out and exposing the truth. But sadly, there are those who are the cheer squad for those spineless and weak gutted scientists who prefer to ignore the facts, evidence and proof that is humanity's greatest con ever. But that really is a tough one for the cheer squad to get their head around that. I wonder why, would be because they'll lose face? I think so.

 

Not in any way.

Correct, it's none of them.

A total crock of "truther-crap" - this is the way of the conspiracy theorist. You have simply no idea about how science works if you think such a vast amount of people would not expose any problems. The entire community works to establish a correct process, it's not even complicated. Your simplistic and bullshit claim is simply unworkable, there could never be silence or complacency in such ludicrously massive numbers!

Hogwash.

 

The only response you get for all of the above is...

 

As I said, no idea whatsoever about how science works or the numbers involved. It isn't just confined to fully qualified people either, up-and-coming people have a point to prove and those at the end of their careers have nothing at all to lose. You are talking crap and posting silly pictures because you are wrong.

 

@Betamax101

And you would reckon the following is bullshit too?

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

If you look at the page after page 29, assigned APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST,
there are 9 pages full of great risks.

 

@Betamax101

Dr. James Thorpe on How Doctors Are Forced to Hide VAXX Truths: ‘We Will Destroy Your Life, Your Career, and Your Family’

"Editor’s Commentary: We normally avoid anecdotal evidence from individuals when the accusations are as hideous as this one. But Dr. James Thorpe is not only respected, he’s also someone who gains absolutely nothing from spreading the truth. This is important because all too often people will make outrageous claims to garner headlines and ask for support. Dr. Thorpe is the opposite. He’s sticking his neck out to reveal the truth about what medical boards across the country and around the world are doing to honest doctors.


It was easy for Big Pharma to get governments, corporate media, Big Tech, and academia to play along with their money-printing Covid-19 “vaccine” agenda. They just had to grease the right palms. But doctors and nurses are generally more difficult to bribe or blackmail. They must be bullied, threatened with expulsion from their own life’s endeavors in order to get them to stay quiet about the inefficacy and health risks associated with the jabs. This is why Big Pharma went to the people in charge — hospital executives and leaders in medical boards — to help coerce doctors and nurses into either promoting the vaccines or keeping their mouths shut if they were opposed to them.


The article below by Ramon Tomey and the video on BrighteonTV must be read and watched. The biggest argument vaxx-nannies make is that their doctors tell them the vaccines are safe and effective. “Trust the science,” they’ll say. They might even have a healthy distrust of government, media, and other Big Pharma minions, but they have a harder time believing their doctors are lying to them. Demonstrating to these skeptics that doctors who speak out are excommunicated from their profession can go a long way towards helping people realize the Covid con is real and the universal vaccine agenda is NOT based on science at all."

 

Yeah, I know how this weird science works. The following is an example.

@ 3:55 min in, Bill gates begins to explain how he'll reduce the CO2 from the planet. If you don't already know, he is of eugenicist blood.

 

NO IT IS NOT. The science you know I am referring to, involves the collective response and research to every single thing within each branch of science. It is the grassroots all the way up to expert level where vast numbers of multi-branch scientists work the problem and examine the results. For you to claim some sort of conspiracy of silence among such numbers is many levels beyond moronic and completely unworkable.

 

He is a concerned doctor and fair play to him for speaking out albeit inaccurately - that is his right. The problem though is that whilst he may be a fantastic and experienced obstetrician , he is not an experienced virologist. His opinion on the effects of the vaccine on pregnant women cannot possibly be accurate, since he has no statistical data to use. People who DO have sufficient data HAVE performed studies and they refute his claims:
Multiple studies show that COVID-19 vaccines don’t cause pregnancy or fertility problems, despite widespread claims on social media - Health Feedback

Further, his issue with being leant on by Medical Boards is nothing more than his own experience. Since he made provably inaccurate claims and quite publicly it is of no surprise that he is being reprimanded. The notable edict of a medical profession is "do no harm" and by saying what he did, he countered this quite significantly!

REFERENCES

• 1 – Lipkind et al. (2022) Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Preterm or Small-for-Gestational-Age at Birth — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 15, 2020–July 22, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
• 2 – Shimabukuro et al. (2021) Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons. New England Journal of Medicine.
• 3 – Zauche et al. (2021) Receipt of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion. New England Journal of Medicine.
• 4 – Kharbanda et al. (2021) Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy. JAMA.
• 5 – Magnus et al. (2021) Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy and First-Trimester Miscarriage. New England Journal of Medicine.
• 6 – Stock et al. (2022) SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination rates in pregnant women in Scotland. Nature Medicine.
• 7 – Villar et al. (2021) Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Among Pregnant Women With and Without COVID-19 Infection: The INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatrics.
• 8 – DeSisto et al. (2021) Risk for Stillbirth Among Women With and Without COVID-19 at Delivery Hospitalization — United States, March 2020–September 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
• 9 – Prasad et al. (2021) No crossreactivity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies with Syncytin-1. Cellular and Molecular Immunology.
• 10 – Lu-Culligan et al. (2021) No evidence of fetal defects or anti-syncytin-1 antibody induction following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. BioRxiv. [Note: This is a preprint that has not yet been peer-reviewed at the time of this review’s publication.]
• 11 – Mattar et al. (2021) Addressing anti-syncytin antibody levels, and fertility and breastfeeding concerns, following BNT162B2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. MedRxiv. [Note: This is a preprint that has not yet been peer-reviewed at the time of this review’s publication.]
• 12 – Bentov et al. (2021) Ovarian follicular function is not altered by SARS–CoV-2 infection or BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Human Reproduction.
• 13 – Edelman et al. (2022) Association Between Menstrual Cycle Length and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination. Obstetrics and Gynecology.

 

No, but you have read something and made a false assumption.

Read the report properly, these are not side-effects from the vaccine!
3.1.3. Review of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Please refer to Appendix 1 for the list of the company’s AESIs for BNT162b2. The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline). The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general. The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine. Table 7 provides a summary review of cumulative cases within AESI categories in the Pfizer safety database

 

Maybe you need to practice what you preach.

APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

You know, just as the same instructions

Pfizer documented adverse effects of what their product has caused, not what covid had caused.

 

Why hasn't the same fearmongering campaign been used for seasonal flu in the past?
Yet for 2 & 1/2 years watching and listening to the bullshit ends up with, "we have to live with it now".
Strange don't you think that the flu was non-existent during this period?
Yes, I know how mind games and weird science work. Any corroboration with the latter is nothing to hold in high regard.