The Covid-19 Pandemic Does Not Exist

That I am.
In your face @Betamax101

 

Even on small things, afraid to be wrong.
FACT CHECK: Did Socrates Say, ‘When The Debate Is Lost, Slander Becomes The Tool Of The Losers’? | Check Your Fact

I'm saying the same things I've said from the start. The ruling for new vaccinations is for an AESI to be incorporated in their reports as a standardized guideline. SPEAC produced the guidelines, I gave you their document which you never read!

Priority List of Adverse Events of Special Interest: COVID-19 - Brighton Collaboration

PDF: LINK

"In March 2020, the Brighton Collaboration and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations partnership, Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC), created and subsequently updated a “priority list of potential adverse events of special interest relevant to COVID-19 vaccine trials.” [1] The list comprises adverse events of special interest (AESIs) based on the specific vaccine platform, adverse events associated with prior vaccines in general, theoretical associations based on animal models, and COVID-19 specific immunopathogenesis. "

It neither upsets me or concerns me and is complete diversion for your stunning and complete AESI failure. The FDA is not Pfizer, how can this confuse you!? The FDA rightly argued about the crazy burden it would create, the judge just as rightly said "employ more people". So what!
"Pittman concluded that while the request may be “unduly burdensome,” releasing the data is of “paramount public importance.” The FDA previously argued the request would burden its Access Litigation and Freedom of Information Branch (the “Branch”), which at the time had “a total of ten employees, including the director and two trainees.” The plaintiff, PHMPT, argued the FDA has a multi-billion dollar budget and is capable of hiring more employees as needed, or asking Congress for a bigger budget."

"Pfizer's 75-year sealed vaccine 'safety data' to be released after judge ruling"

Complete bullshit lie. How can you claim that to be a true headline? That is just so deceptive.

No. I use it to denote crazy conspiracy crap - batshit. Perfectly descriptive.

Not wanted. They did. So I bet you didn't know they actually did it!
Experts say changes to CDC’s vaccination definition are normal | AP News
More irrelevant diversion.

How so? Your pathetic diversion is meaningless.

 

Then why did you state it is NOT what it is?

Deluded.

You must be, because you insinuated that it is not a report from Pfizer.

 

More fact-checking?

 

Is this because MSM didn't cover it?

 

Sure it isn't.
That's why the following has been compiled;
https://community.covidvaccineinjur...wed-medical-papers-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/

 

Hmm, on page 2 of the Pfizer document, the following is stated;

As it's unclear for some to understand, as it is interpreted differently by some. Would anyone like to take
a guess?

 

~ Speaking of Pfizer double-talk — there's this doozy :

​

 

A lie, nowhere have I said the report title is wrong! The AESI has now been proven to be from a third party your claim shows you to be.....Deluded.

You really are totally clueless. The AESI is provided not just for Pfizer but for any drug of its type. If you think an entry in the Appendix insinuates anything anything about the report's source you clearly need to be educated in research material.

 

Finally you took the time to actually read the damn report. It is documented in Table 7, using the list provided in Appendix 1 as search criteria.

 

Use your own words, deluded.

 

And again with the moronic childish emoticons. That's right, sure it is. The AESI list is provided by SPEAC..

Grasping at straws. If you read the list of "a thousand" you can see with very little effort that the vast majority are related to the side effect Myocarditis.

 

Bullshit, "search criteria"
What utter nonsense rubbish bullshit is that?

"Monthly safety reports primarily focus on events that occurred during the reporting interval
and include information not relevant to a BLA submission such as line lists of adverse events
by country. We are most interested in a cumulative analysis of post-authorization safety data
to support your future BLA submission. Please submit an integrated analysis of your
cumulative post-authorization safety data, including U.S. and foreign post-authorization
experience, in your upcoming BLA submission. Please include a cumulative analysis of the
Important Identified Risks, Important Potential Risks, and areas of Important Missing
Information identified in your Pharmacovigilance Plan, as well as adverse events of special
interest and vaccine administration errors (whether or not associated with an adverse event).
Please also include distribution data and an analysis of the most common adverse events. In
addition, please submit your updated Pharmacovigilance Plan with your BLA submission.”

No clue whatsoever, do you?
It's highlighted in bold text, but you proceed to think it means something else to suit your idea, hey. Weird.

 

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers. Not Socrates

Hypocrisy. It takes a monumental troll not to realize when they have been proven wrong and a real joker to be afraid to admit it!

 

You're the one grasping at straws making the document into something else.
Myocarditis! Wow, you finally recognise that the Pfizer covid injection causes an adverse effect, that's amazing. What else will you discover on this journey?

 

HAHAHAHAHAHA. You said it, you live it.

 

You really make yourself look more and more foolish with your silly little responses:
Adverse event of special interest (AESI) | Pharmacovigilance (allaboutpharmacovigilance.org)

Contained in Table 7 from possible effects as identified in Appendix 1.

The problem here is that it's been proven to be your failure, so make all the noise you want.

I don't think you even understand any of it, you're just making noise.

 

Troll.

 

You still haven't answered my question. What government branch or alphabet agency do you work for?

 

I doubt you know what the word means. Maybe you should look it up!
Who began the incessant use of poor language? the name starts with 'B'

 

A lie. You were the one who assumed damn appendix entry was a concise list of adverse effects. Epic fail and afraid to admit it.

Failure to admit your list of 1000 is mainly myocarditis. In very small percentiles against the worldwide campaign.

It isn't a journey and I have already discovered that "truthers" are liars and have no capability to admit their colossal failures.

 

None. Fully retired now. What disinformation site do you work for?

No need, you are trolling now.

The AESI was provided by a third party and is not the list of actual adverse events, the list can be found in Table 7. You were wrong and are afraid to admit it.

 

What else will you discover on this journey?[/QUOTE]

It isn't a journey and I have already discovered that "truthers" are liars and have no capability to admit their colossal failures.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, sure it is.
But at least you admit that the injections cause myocarditis. It's amazing it took so long to figure it out.

 

I didn't need to figure it out. It was widely reported and the scientific fraternity began a full campaign to examine its cause. Even when the adverse effects are in small numbers that's what the science does.

So much for the batshit plan to kill everyone off.

The AESI was provided by a third party and is not the list of actual adverse events, the list can be found in Table 7. You were wrong and are afraid to admit it.

 

Yes, you need to find out because you have no clue. Just as you have none with the Pfizer doc.

focus on events that occurred during the reporting interval
and include information not relevant to a BLA submission such as line lists of adverse events
by country.
Please include a cumulative analysis of the
Important Identified Risks, Important Potential Risks
as well as adverse events of special
interest and vaccine administration errors (whether or not associated with an adverse event)

Still trying to work it out, hey?