Let's narrow in on this whole bomb/no bomb point. The FBI said there were bombs. Question. Was the FBI WRONG? http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/02/fbi-believed-that-911-involved-bombs.html
What can you tell me about E.P. Heidner ? Does anybody know who exactly he is ? What are the details of anything he has written ? I have just read one or two things which rank as the most unexpected finds I have ever found on the Internet . Is the original research of , Eastman ,Flocco , Durham and Schwarz worth tracking down , or does Heidner embrace all of their research in his work?
The government loves their acronyms...in this case it was convenient for them to use 'bombing investigation'.....doesn't mean they neccessarily thought there were bombs
The linked article proves that the FBI investigated for bombs, which is true. The investigation was thorough and exhaustive. No evidence was found, therefore no bombs were used. The thread title is misleading. The FBI never claimed bombs were used.
I see.....so when the FBI says "bomb", they don't really mean "bomb". I didn't realize that. Perhaps we're getting somewhere now. Thanks!
I see...so, this: Following the massive terrorist attacks against New York and Washington, the FBI dedicated 7,000 of its 11,000 Special Agents and thousands of FBI support personnel to the PENTTBOM investigation. "PENTTBOM" is short for Pentagon, Twin Towers Bombing. ...means something other than bomb. Okay. See, this is all so very confusing. Bombs don't really mean bombs. Very confusing.
What is a bomb? An explosive weapon detonated by impact, proximity to an object, a timing mechanism, or other means Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/bomb#ixzz1tp0onGoD So, a plane flown into a building doesn't fit the definition of bomb how? Anything can be used as a weapon based on intent. Did the hijackers decide to use the planes as weapons? Yes. Did the planes detonate on impact? Yes. So how is a plane not a bomb when used as a weapon?
I didn't say that 'bomb' doesn't mean 'bomb'. You are being either obtuse or disrespectful. What is the word immediately following 'bomb'? It's 'Investigation". As stated in the article, the FBI investigated the possibility of bombs.
So....plane mean bombs and bombs mean planes. The terms are to be used interchangably, is that correct? So...all those explosions the fireman in the video heard, were actually planes. I'm trying to understand why a bomb isn't a bomb, and a plane is a bomb instead. The English language differentiates between the word plane and bomb fairly clearly I thought. Is this another one of those "only on 9/11" rules we're supposed to use?
You've been insisting on 'one point, one response' so that's what I gave you. Can you refute the single point I made?
Okay...fine. So what you're saying is that even though it was called a bomb investigation, it wasn't really a bomb investigation. That correct?
Okay..back to the insults...thank you for your input and let me know when your tantrum is over and I'll be happy to reengage you.
Yeah, if I were you I would run from that response too. It completely points out the dishonesty of your post and that you know your entire claim is nothing but horse(*)(*)(*)(*). Now run along. Your claim has been completely disproven.
I don't think it is important anymore, Hannibal. RWAF has once again jumped off a cliff with both feet only to find out the water is an inch deep. This is just like the Flight 93 site he linked as "proof" he was right when it was clearly a site proving flight 93 DID crash there.
The FBI and NIST were investigating all possibilities. The eyewitness testimony was certainly a part of that.
And they found zero residue in all the debris? How long was it before debris was shipped out of the United States?
And they found zero residue in all the debris? How long was it before debris was shipped out of the United States?
What claims would that be? I have yet to see a fireman claim he saw a bomb. Some survivors have changed their stories drastically since 9/11 and have since lost all credibility. Do you have some specific examples you could give us of a firefighter or survivor that claims to have seen a bomb?
After bomb sniffing dogs, rescue operations, engineering teams from FEMA, ASCE, NIST and the FBI went over the scene ... and then after the inspections at Fresh Kills. After that. http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/groundzerocleanup,freshkillssortingopera for lots of details.
The "official" story has changed over the years as well, yet you maintain it is still credible. How is that?
The point is that protocol was ignored and if anybody ever DID want to do any investigation, they wouldn't be able to, because it was all shipped out of the country.
