The Hoax of Global Warming

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by RoanokeIllinois, Jul 2, 2022.

  1. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,748
    Likes Received:
    74,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    upload_2022-12-17_6-21-26.jpeg

    Was it crying in loneliness?
     
  2. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,748
    Likes Received:
    74,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    :roll: Read and learn

    https://www.ipcc.ch/
     
  3. Pieces of Malarkey

    Pieces of Malarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2022
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    1,565
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Try referencing real science. If you can that is.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  4. Pixie

    Pixie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2021
    Messages:
    7,224
    Likes Received:
    2,408
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Why worry?
    We will all be dead.
    It is the problem of the next generation.
    A poor legacy but they have science and technology on their side. As well as our poor example.
    Our future is in their hands and I am quite happy to leave it at that.
     
  5. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,217
    Likes Received:
    17,824
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There's no need to worry.

    ". . . And now for the final element of manipulating risk perception: asymmetric distribution of risks (#9), whereby children and under-developed countries are at greatest risk. Serious virtue signaling tells us we need to eliminate fossil fuel emissions for the sake of the children and the underdeveloped countries. Well, children in affluent countries are at far less risk than their great-great grandparents (not to mention children in underdeveloped countries) owing to the presence of fossil fuels in their lives that provide secure structures for their homes and schools with central heating and air conditioning, not to mention abundant electricity and also fertilizer to insure their food supply. . . .

    The net effect of all this apocalyptic rhetoric, which effectively exploits how humans misperceive risk, is to increase neurotic worrying in many people (particularly children), which can indeed make people more vulnerable to negative stress reactions. [LINK]

    Congratulations to all the proselytizers of climate doom, you have finally demonstrated an actual adverse impact of climate change that is actually caused by humans – psychological distress. This psychological distress is directly caused by you: the mistaken, irrational, politically motivated people that have created effective propaganda that is creating negative stress reactions particularly among children who have yet to develop a clear sense of self and lack a context for being able to filter the BS. . . . ."

    Misperception and amplification of climate risk

    Posted on December 13, 2022 by curryja | 102 comments


    by Judith Curry

    “Something frightening poses a perceived risk. Something dangerous poses a real risk.” – Swedish physician Hans Rosling et al.

    Continue reading →
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022

Share This Page