The Hunter Impeachment, Day 1: For heaven's sake.. TRUMP appointed him!

Where did you read these testimonies, Got a link? Nevermind its in 2 posts above mine.

 

You sound truly hurt. Perhaps you should invest in the soothing ointment knows as Preparation H.... Any local drug/pharmacy, even groceries will be able to sooth your hurt... LOL

 

Pure speculation on your part; you know nothing, actually.

You just showed otherwise. For you, Biden is guilty; the problem is: you don't know of what.

 

I have NO idea what "$1B" you're talking about. But this thread is about the ridicule Republicans made of themselves in yesterday's session. They tried and failed to pin something on Merrick Garland who has only kept and ... even gave MORE power... to the Trump appointee.

 

Thanks for your high level contribution!

 

See post #49. Then take two aspirin to deal with the headache you'll get from reading the facts.

 

Oooohhh. Looks like somebody was particularly disappointed about yesterday's Republican debacle in the Committee to Weaponize Congress.

 

Hundreds of links have been posted on Bribed Joe's crimes. Here's another, and it's filled with even more links.

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com...we-start-calling-it-what-it-is-namely-bribery

 

Weiss is a U.S. district attorney. Garland is the attorney general. What more proof do you need?...lol

 

That's impossible to believe. The clip of Bribed Joe bragging about withholding the $1B from Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor that was investigating Burisma was played all throughout the Trump impeachment saga.

Weiss is covering up Crackhead Hunter's felonies to hide Bribed Joe's.

And your title is a falsehood:

• It's an impeachment inquiry, not an impeachment.
• Bribed Joe is under Impeachment Inquiry, not Crackhead Hunter.

 

Evidence? You call that evidence? Tis but a scratch.

 

You call withholding $1B in aid to Ukraine until they fired a corrupt prosecutor who REFUSED to investigate corrupt companies (Burisma being one of them) a bribe TO Joe?

You make absolutely NO sense. The good thing is that this thread is not about any of that. It's about the LACK of evidence of any wrongdoing by ANYBODY in power in this administration that the Committee for Republicans to Weaponize Congress has been able to produce Forget "evidence"... even so much as a NARRATIVE of wrongdoing by anybody in this administration.

I smell Republicans will once again make fools of themselves. Just like they did with all the OTHER made-up scandals they have been fabricating in the last few years: Pizzagate, Hillary's server, Obama's IRS, Dominion, the Georgia vote workers ... ANY of the conspiracy theories they never managed to... let's not even say "prove"... but even make a coherent case.

 

Three pages of content none of which is yours, and this is your first effort on the thread? Sorry satire isn't in your wheelhouse...

 

Nah, no need. The referral post doesn't contribute facts. I understand your confusion....

 

Dear Lord, you can't possibly be this lost. Burisma states, and US Investigators first alerted the Corrupt FBI and then Whistle Blew to Congress that Burisma paid $10M in bribes to the Bidens to get the prosecutor, that Bribed Joe got fired, fired.

The Impeachment Inquiry is of Bribed Joe, not Crackhead Hunter, and it's bribery, and you claiming I'm not "making any sense" is like being lectured on dieting by Brian Seltzer.

 

Over 20 LLC shell companies with no obvious Biden Business.

Biden lying about knowing his son's business.

Numerous visits by Hunter's bosses to the WH.

Numerous phone calls which Joe Biden set in on.

Numerous people coming forward saying Joe Biden is getting a cut of his son's salary.

Numerous email aliases.

Who said he was being impeached for lying? He is an habitual liar and cannot be trusted to tell the truth.

I did not realize that stating facts was a problem.

 

Look, dude... I know all the nonsense they fed you about the prosecutor. It was by the same people who fed you "Antifa attacked the Capitol on January 6" and "Dominion machines altered the votes" and similar...

In the wingnut press that you follow, they feed that nonsense to the most gullible in their audience. However, this thread is about a Congressional Committee where you are unceremoniously called out the moment you make up nonsense like that without evidence. And they WERE called out when they tried.

I don't know why you keep believing what you see on the same wingnut media that has fooled you so many times in the past, but it's in THESE committees where we learn facts. Because if they don't show PROOF they immediately look ridiculous.

There are dozens of threads with you conspiracy theories and NO evidence. THIS thread is about the FACT. And, if there is any evidence, THAT is where you'll see it. Not on your make-believe conspiracy websites. So you can now stop trying to derail the thread. It's not going to work with me.

 

I'm not derailing the thread, you are laying down smoke.

Your title is false:

• Bribed Joe, not Crackhead Hunter is under Impeachment Inquiry for bribery.

Why did Bribed Joe use so many fake names while coordinating the selling of his office to corrupt foreign oligarchs with Crackhead Hunter?

'Vice President Biden used three email aliases, or fake names, during the Obama administration. The Washington Times had an amazing cover this week. On page one, they had three pictures of President Biden with his three different names.'

'how much was' Bribed 'Joe collaborating with Hunter Biden, to get money from Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Romania, Russia, China, and the kinds of things they were promising people and the degree to which they were abusing the public trust.'

Weiss is trying to bury Crackhead Hunter's felonies, not to protect the Crackhead, but to protect Bribed Joe. And yes, Weiss was nominated by Trump as were a number of the other folks who finally took Trump out. That's why I prefer DeSantis. I think Trump was much too naive about these Snakes.

 

It is probably important to note that US Attorneys are not Judges where the party in power typically appoints judges from their side of the aisle.

Unlike judges, US Attorneys are almost always rubber stamp appointed from the direct recommendation of the two Senators in that state. Following suit, Trump rubber-stamped the two Democrat Senators' choice.

This was not a hand-picked selection as the left would have you believe.

 

That may be, but we give the President the power to appoint, and look at who all Trump appointed:

1. Comey,
2. Weiss,
3. Magoo Sessions
4. Rat Faced Rosenstein
5. McCabe
6. Orr
7. He even appointed Wray

Trump did a tremendous job in a lot areas, but pooched kicked these appointments, and it cost all of us dearly.

Trump never established control of the Federal Agencies, and the Federal Agencies rigged 2020 and desperately trying to rig 2024

In my opinion re-establishing Constitutional Control over these Rogue Federal Agencies was the purpose of the Trump Presidency.

 

My intention was not to comment upon the wisdom in various choices made as a result of Trump coming into office as a political outsider, but only to point out that in this instance, that particular pick was following long-standing precedent as just a rubber stamp from whomever the Democrat Senators in that state selected.

US Attorneys, especially in a nondescript district such as Delaware, are typically not considered to be a consequential choice that has political ramifications which is why this long standing precedent exists. I suspect there are a lot of people that do not understand this, and they assume that since Trump nominated him that somehow means that he could not be a Democrat shill.

My intent is not to support or oppose Trump, but rather to clear up confusion that people think/imply that Weiss is a Republican in any way.

 

Whatever you think of these 7 persons, there is no evidence that Trump is getting any wiser. The program for his next presidency from 2024 is retribution to all his opponents, chaotic policies with incessant turnover in his administration, nepotism and dictatorship.

 

Some of the problems with the Trump presidency, is that he was essentially a 3rd party candidate that captured the GOP nomination and he did not have the allegiance of either side.

And unlike a Governor, he did not come with a political team. Take DeSantis for example: he has an AG, he has a working relationship with several governors, all of which have AG's and State Prosecutors. They have education secretaries, heads of environmental agencies, they have a massive pool from which to draw appointees with known histories, that they have experience working with.

Trump came with none of that, and the Swamp ate him up. In my mind it's too big of a job for on the job training, but, I'll also support the nominee, and if it's Trump, it's Trump. Now if Dem nominated RFK, I'd have to give that a lot of thought, but, there seem to be little danger of that.

And by the way, Hunter isn't under Impeachment Inquiry, Bribed Joe is, the title of this topic is a pretense.

 

And that's another problem I have with Trump. He's not articulating the positive vision for America that he was in 2016. I'd like to see him get back to that, I think that would be worth a 3 point bump in the polls, which would put his lead outside the MOE

And the title of this topic strikes me as gaslighting intended to conceal that this all about Bribed Joe, not Crackhead Hunter.

 

I agree, with the exception of the part about RFK.

While I appreciate his candidacy, in my mind he would have no chance of winning, and as such a vote for him is a watered-down opposition to Democrats that would ultimately be a wasted vote, and I'd rather oppose Democrats with both barrels.