You are making far too many assumptions. Besides you are the only one that failed. You failed to answer the question: Again...why were men excluded and six women appointed to the jury?
Which is completely irrelevant to their ability to carry out a duty as a juror. Again, you should have read the content at the link you didn't ask for. Clearly education is required here. Oh, so now I don't agree with you so I must be Jewish? Once again, your ignorance of the law does not constitute evidence that the jury was rigged to deliver a specific verdict. Yet again you have failed to prove the conjecture offered as the subject of this post. And once again I can explain your failure with the following passage:
No; it's the communist Chinese that the Zionist Henry Kissenger outsourced American industry to, and they are also pushing loot whatever remains in the American treasury by starting wars with Iran, Syria and Russia.
Your rhetoric is meaningless. When you try to explain why men were excluded and, six women are appointed as juror's in a fight between two men you will be saying something.
In good faith I assumed you had some sort of proof of this motivation when you made the thread. Clearly you do not, and furthermore I will not assume to know the motivation for jury selection. You assumed that men and women are different. -This has nothing to do with the ability to arrive at a just verdict. You assumed that Martin was murdered You assumed that Zimmerman did not need to use lethal force -Both of these assumptions showcase your own predisposition in the case, and have nothing to do with the juror's ability to arrive at a just verdict.
How I think has nothing to do with whether the jury was rigged. Yet again you fail to prove your premise.
Again; You failed to answer the question: Why were men excluded and six women appointed to the jury? - - - Updated - - - You must be some kind of fairy.
Are you trying to claim I rigged the jury? I wasn't involved in jury selection. How I answer that question has nothing to do with whether or not the jury was rigged. Are you ever going to attempt to defend your claim with evidence, or are you going to keep arguing that the jury was rigged because they didn't come to the same conclusion you did?
Bear in mind, to the Lib, everyone else is responsible for someone else's actions. Ya gotta feel sorry for their bad aim. They should post a sign in here: DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
or OR they were just women with common sense and a an understanding of our justice system. If the jury was tampered and bribed as you say then you werent paying attention at jury duty. Worse you were but didnt understand it. No system is perfect however ours is the best. Or maybe you prefer an American Idol voting style where you get to robo call who is innocent and guilty. Wow, you are all the same people that defended OJ and now are rioting all occuturd again against the same justice system. P.S. - did you catch that occuturd on tv with the megaphone spouting about the 1% and capitalists? HAHA these fools just prove how effing imbecilic the left is. They dont even know what the f they are rioting for, they just need a good riot every now and then so they can dust off their megaphones and beatnick drums.
You clearly have zero knowledge of how a jury is picked. You cant possibly be from the United States. If you are how is it possibe you have never been to jury duty? But to answer your question. Six women were agreed on because the prosecutor most likely thought he would be able to play to the emotions of women who could possibly view the trial from the point of view of a mother and he was hoping that would work to his advantage and the defense probably scrutinized the backgrounds and their answers they gave before the trial and had no issue. If you dont like the jury AFTER the decision, then your bame resides solely on the prosection and no one else. Period.
The angry mob thinks the jury was tampered with because they did not return the verdict that they staked their miserable lives on. Nothing more than sour grapes.
the verdict was released on the 13th. 13 is the "bad luck" number used by the occultists who run our government. while completely leaving my personal opinion out of it, ...the number 13 tells me that "bad luck" for the public was to release Zimmerman. good luck would have been to convict him. Zimmerman pulled power rank through his judge dad and the power structure to get a "rigged" jury. That's what releasing the verdict on the 13th tells me (us)
The more I hear out of the hate mongers the more I believe these post should go into the Conspiracy Theory section, IMO. And who is "us".......
LOL, this does need to be in the conspiracy section. No proof needed when imagination creates the facts. EDIT: It is in the conspiracy section. LOL
This post was released as the 69th post made by this poster. 69 is the "mutual oral sex" number used by teenagers who troll our forum. While completely leaving my personal opinion out of it, ...the number 69 tells me that "a teenager who's screwed in the head" was the reason to post this post. Conspiracy theorists pull all sorts of thoughts and opinions from various orifices of their bodies. What they don't do is present any concrete evidence that anyone rigged the Zimmerman jury. That's what releasing this post on post # 69 tells me (us)
Just in case there's any doubt after the poster decides to cover up the evidence of his little slip http://i.imgur.com/ZizKsfQ.jpg - - - Updated - - - You've been tricked by the conspiracy. I said 69 posts made by the poster. It was his 69th post here at PF.
It's okay, the conspiracy is crafty. You don't think they would make figuring this stuff out easy would you? At least your eyes are open now. Now if you'll excuse me, I have just received some mail that leads me to believe I may have already won 100 million dollars.
Darn that conspiracy. I've just been informed that I can not change my name to "You may have already" and sue based on false advertising
