You are trying to fool everyone here with these silly questions, and we both know that. And what is your conclusion, based on the fact there is no video evidence of these 2 shootings? Why are you so afraid to say it? lol
PURE PROPAGANDA! https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...t-mostly-young-people/?utm_term=.756ec8e821b5 Only 10% were under 18. The average age was 49. Most marching were not their for anti-gun causes. I just nuked the whole premise of the first post. Why didn't the U.S. media report this on the nightly news? ABC? NBC? CBS? This is pure propaganda for stupid people to believe and repeat. What did Stalin call those people? "Useful Idiots" <--- That hits the mark.
It is difficult to comprehend the notion of a public school in the united states that does not possess security camera on the premises. As to the matter of releasing video evidence to the public, the question to be asking is why did a judge suppress every piece of video evidence that demonstrated Adam Lanza was indeed present, and make it completely inaccessible to the public? With so many incidents of violence being made available to the public, it raises numerous questions that only gives credibility to those who believe in conspiracies. If the evidence truly fits the official narrative, then prove such. And yet it cannot be found, and there are conflicting statements about just what happened. One is that Nikolas Cruz pulled the fire alarm and shot students as they were exiting the building, another is that Nikolas Cruz carried out the shooting within the building. So long as he claims responsibility for the act, he is subject to fame and recognition. Being a part of the current generation, he would understand how much prestige mass murderers are subject to by society. If he did not actually do it, he is what would be considered an attention-seeking glory hog. The deaths did occur, that is not being disputed. It is merely being asked why the evidence has not been made available to the public, which would serve to shut down the conspiracies once and for all. Since Adam Lanza is dead and cannot be tried, there is no reason that the video evidence of him being present at Sandy Hook should be suppressed any longer. The video evidence of Stephen Paddock was certainly made available.
Yet again, another false claim. It is not necessary to draw a conclusion in order to ask questions about a particular matter. Fear is an irrelevant matter and is not something that is experienced on the part of myself.
you are not fooling anyone. but we all know what your conclusion is here. It's either fear, or embarrassment. If not, then you would answer.
The only effort at fooling is that of yourself. Then by all means. Tell everyone present, precisely what the conclusion on the part of myself is, in detail greater than one sentence, and devoid of the nonsense "lol" anywhere within. The question has been answered on the part of myself. It is simply a matter of the recipient, that being yourself, not liking the answer, and refusing to accept it.
you are not fooling anyone. lol, you clearly think the absence of video evidence means the shootings were staged, or didn't happen. it has not, which is why I keep calling you on it. You are not answering. You are dodging, because you are either afraid or embarrassed by the answer.
Sorry, how do you know there wasn’t any video? I still want to know what you are implying You seem to avoid answering that but I don’t blame you because a secret conspiracy might even sound crazy to you ..By the way it is very easy to avoid cameras if you know where they are
The video may be available or sandy hook, but it would be cruel to release it. Cruz shot into classrooms and we have seen videos. My friends son was in the classroom when three of his friends died and he was only saved because he hid behind the file cabinet. What are you trying to imply? Is this right wing conspiracy number 8246?
Considerable efforts have been made to locate any trace of video. Various, numerous sources, have been browsed, and nothing has been found that amounts to a return on the investment. Nothing is being implied. A simple question is just being asked. How many students are realistically in possession of such knowledge, however? Even if such were the case, why would Nikolas Cruz make any effort to avoid the present security cameras if his intention was to escape alive, and take credit for the incident? Avoiding security cameras takes significant time and effort to execute properly, and while such may possibly be done in the time leading up to the execution of the attack, there is no reason such would be done once the attack has been carried out, as the sound of a firearm being discharged would warrant an immediate response, which it did.
Withholding evidence on the basis that it would be cruel to release it does not make sense. A great amount of cruel, hurtful video evidence of various crimes has been released to the media over the course of years. The fact that there is nothing even showing Adam Lanza getting out of his motor vehicle in the parking lot, thus showing that he was actually there, is the sort of basis that breeds conspiracy theories, and gives them credibility with the public. There is no standard available that would suggest that video of his presence in the parking lot is far too hurtful to be made available for public knowledge. As has been stated previously, nothing is being implied. A question is simply being presented.
Because there is no effort on the part of myself to fool anyone. Only those who are devoid of any legitimacy try to fool others. False. Try again. The inability of yourself to comprehend a basic fact is not the fault of myself. Matters such as fear and/or embarrassment are of no relevance in this matter on the part of myself, as they are not aspects that are experienced by myself. The constant efforts on the part of yourself in attempting to interject such to the discussion, in an effort to change the narrative of the discussion, does nothing but demonstrate the absence of a coherent point on the part of yourself. The question cannot be adequately answered by yourself, so an effort is being made to change the direction of discussion to something that actually can be addressed by yourself.
Has it been asked? Here is one explanation. https://www.naplesnews.com/story/ne...elease-parkland-surveillance-video/396305002/
This doesn't fool anyone. true. I don't need to. Your reluctance to answer the question shows this. It is a demonstrable fact you have no answered the question. You are refusing to answer the question, because you are afraid or embarrassed by the answer. Nobody is fooled by this act of yours.
It is being asked on the part of myself Going by what is contained within the article, and what has been covered in the time since the incident, law enforcement is opposing the release of security footage that would demonstrate that they stood around outside the building for the seven minutes students were being murdered, because they were ordered by a superior who was not on scene to stand down and not engage, in clear violation of established and practiced protocols.
Only those without legitimacy attempt to fool others. Refusing to be baited into an irrelevant tangent does not actually prove anything. The only demonstrable fact, is the lack of comprehension on the part of yourself. Everything that is relevant has been addressed by myself. The question is not being addressed because it possesses no relevance to the discussion. It is no more relevant than questions pertaining to preferred sexual activity.
Hence your attempt at fooling people. you are afraid or embarrassed to answer. It's ok, because we all know why. nope. It is a matter of record in this thread that you have not answered my question. YOU brought it up!!! Your "questioning" of why there is no video evidence shows you conclude the incidents didn't happen, or were staged. yes, sexual activity was not brought up by you. However, wild batshit conspiracy theories were.
Then present precisely which conspiracy theory and/or theories were brought up, and where they were brought up. Show everyone that the words being presented by yourself are factually correct for a chance.
right wing rapist ho threatened youthful protester resigns from his Radio Goebbels position: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...lman-resigns-david-hogg-sexual-assault-threat A conservative commentator who sent a tweet saying he would use “a hot poker” to sexually assault an outspoken 17-year-old survivor of the Florida high school shooting has resigned from a St Louis TV station and been taken off the radio after several advertisers withdrew from his shows. KDNL-TV accepted Jamie Allman’s resignation and canceled The Allman Report, according to a brief statement from the Sinclair Broadcast Group, which operates the TV station. Before the show’s launch in January 2015, KDNL-TV touted it as a nontraditional newscast with a conservative spin. The pervert should be charged with sexual assault and with making terrorist threats.
It is quite apparent that the delusions being experienced by yourself are growing more and more severe. Seek professional, psychological help immediately, before it is too late. If it is truly believed that asking the question of where is the video footage, is somehow suggesting that neither the Sandy Hook nor Parkland incidents occurred, it is safe to conclude that severe psychological illness is present on the part of yourself.
