Making threats of terrorism and sexual assault is hardly limited to those that identify with conservative beliefs.
Terrorism and perversion are far more prevalent among members of the far right. In this case, had it been a lefty who made those terrorist threats, the right wing would be saying that the stupidity shown was typical of the left. If you deny that then you haven't read their ludicrous posts.
Then by all means, demonstrate such. Prove that the statement on the part of yourself is factually correct. In turn, citations will be presented on the part of myself where those who align with the liberal mentality have openly engaged in threats of violence and sexual assault, and have been celebrated for such. Which does nothing to excuse the immaturity and petulance of those who identify with the liberal mentality. It is literally a tit-for-tat approach to doing things.
Your repeating the same question over and over after getting possible answers is quite sick. There were no videos....ok?
Meaning that it is not actually possible for yourself to demonstrate proof of the claim that is being presented by yourself. Otherwise it would have been presented by now, rather than telling others to go and find the proof for themselves.
And if there are indeed no videos of either incident, despite the apparent abundance of security cameras present, it is difficult to be anything other than curious about why such is the case.
As opposed to those who identify with liberal policies who continually repeat false claims about firearms, thus demonstrating that they have no idea what they are even talking about?
