The NRA Is Ready For The Gun Control Fight...Are You?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Agent_286, Jan 20, 2013.

  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    F'n A I am ready for the fight. Just joined the NRA.

    - - - Updated - - -

    So? So you haven't formed a militia, yet the second clause would still be in effect because you could form a "well regulated militia" at any time in the future.
     
  2. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Yes we do. And seeing as the 2nd Amendment clearly states the peoples rights you've pointed out the unconstitusionalism of state gun laws. Thanks. Still haven't answered the question posed. You bore me with your predictable yet unrhythmic dance moves.
     
  3. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Where did you get any impression that the (Individual) People who comprise the Militia of the United States do not get their wellness of regulation prescribed by our federal Congress?
     
  4. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So its your contention (being a self described federalist) that the 2nd Amendment has absolutely no bearing on citizens protecting them selves from tyrannical government?

    When you answer that question you will have the answer to your last post. I can't make this any simpler for you.
     
  5. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I understand our Second Amendment to mean State intervention on behalf of the People regarding tyranny from the general government.

    Here is something that supports my contention and denies and disparages any Thing more anarchic:

     
  6. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Can you show me where in the US Constitution it says its only the States duty?
     
  7. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The power to suppress Insurrections or rebellions of Individuals of the People should be self-evident.
     
  8. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Have you noticed your inability to answer any question?
     
  9. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The power to call forth the militia to suppress Insurrections of Individuals of the People is clearly delegated to our federal Congress in Article 1, Section 8.
     
  10. tomfoo13ry

    tomfoo13ry Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,962
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You're wasting your time trying to have a rational discussion with that one. He just keeps repeating the same mindless phrases over and over and over again. He is a master of the non sequitur.
     
  11. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yeah I know, but if you listen to him go round and round enough eventually he comes full cycle. Then I know its time to get up and put my laundry in the dryer.:wink:
     
  12. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Says the person who habitually resorts to fallacy for his Cause.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Unlike those of the opposing view who merely regurgitate obsolete propaganda and rhetoric; at least, I know when to update my propaganda and rhetoric.
     
  13. Bondo

    Bondo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,768
    Likes Received:
    251
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ayuh,..... 'n You have No credibility, at All....

    Yer tolerated, not engaged...
     
  14. Taxcutter

    Taxcutter New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    20,847
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I sure hope the NRA is ready for a fight. That's what i pay my dues for.
     
  15. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I would have more confidence in your sincerity if you had responded with a valid argument.
     
  16. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you have no idea what a fallacy is. which is why you incorrectly accuse others of using them, while posting nothing but non sequiturs and strawmen.



    your arguments have been completely demolished using US supreme court precedent.
     
  17. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    You would inspire so much more confidence in your sincerity if you had actually presented a valid argument.
     
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've demolished your argument already. nothing left to do but point out stupidity when I see it.
     
  19. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    You merely keep claiming that this is "irrelevant" to your special pleading:

     
  20. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    again. you have no idea what special pleading means.

    the part of the decision you quoted has no effect what so ever on my argument. you remain refuted.
     
  21. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Your argument only claims paragraph (1) as the only position.
     
  22. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    rahl, give it up. You should be able to see that facts will never sway some peoples opinion.

    [​IMG]
     
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    nope.......that is your strawman.
     
  24. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    How do you account for paragraph (2)?
     
  25. jackdog

    jackdog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    19,691
    Likes Received:
    384
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Democrats who know history know that this new gun control push is not going to end well at the polls. A lot of people both Democrat and GOP in the rural states won't take kindly to California and New York city trying to force their views on them. I say bring it on Obama and Harry
     

Share This Page