Dude, I personally have been hearing the propaganda by the left at least 43 years...Again you didn't answer the question what caused the hysterics 107 years ago, horse farts? .
For centuries, this planet's not had combustion engines. For centuries, this planet's not engaged in nuclear warfare or testing and development. For centuries, aerosol hasn't been making holes in the ozone. The air where I write you is cleaner than when we burned coal for our power and had more manufacturing. But there is still pollution in, not just London, but in cities across the north of England as well. It seems to me what my country's lost in manufacturing, it's gained in cleaner, non smoggy air. That's global warming in corolation to air polltion but, perhaps the micro plastic pollution in the planet's water is absorbing heat from the sun in the Earth's waters? - but if nothing else and the global temperature aside real quick; emissions into all aspects of the environment are perhaps bordering the toxic because they're not organic and don't belong in the food chain or the ecosytem? - http://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...ding-way-into-foods-study-finds-a3330076.html
Well tecoyah, you do need to study up a bit. Plankton activity does increase with increased CO2. Yes it does regardless of tecoyah's rude uploads demonstrating a lack of knowledge. aka ignorance. The top American science journal, Science did have the article mentioned above. That global warming calculations failed to take into account the increased plankton activity in the south pacific and CO2 sequestration. This article was not an editorial. It was a research paper. Why don't you read it as I have. Take the last word, I will do my best not to reply unless there is something on topic & smart.