The Virus of Mass Voter Challenges Threatens Democracy and Is Spreading Fast

That's a creative excuse to still refuse to provide or discuss actual evidence.

 

You wouldn't accept anything I could provide, why should I waste my time? Just keep swallowing up all the BS Dems and their loyal media keep flushing down your throat.

 

Yes. That is the typical response I get from conspiracy theorists who were never actually willing to discuss evidence in the first place.

 

And this is the same stupidity I hear from dedicated Biden worshipers; Trumpsychosis sufferers.

 

I'm sorry that you think that only stupid people care about the concept of evidence. I disagree.

 

Ironically that's exactly why I don't Bother to unearth evidence to folks like you - if it's not from a democrat-approved source you're mentally conditioned to reject it.

 

Yes. That's the common excuse I hear from your side for why they have jack **** to back up their claims and are incapable of discussing basic logic.

 

Oh I read it all right I just stripped out the virtue signaling and lies. The left is firmly convinced that they cannot win without cheating and so any thing that might make voting rights secure is verboten. No matter how large a percentage of voters favor it.

 

And then there's these ignorant pomposity. I forgot that.

 

It's not about 'challenging the vote count' (candidates are already allowed to do this), it's about challenging the legitimacy of the ballots and BLOCKS OF VOTERS, the individuals, not the 'count',. and it allows for it to be done willy nilly, without evidence by any yahoo with a hair up his butt about the election.

And this will be, and has been, abused, especially by groups like True The Vote, etc.

 

That's a cop out. There are a number of conservative sources that are legit, like the WSJ, Christian Science Monitor, The Bulwark, San Diego Union, National Review, to name a few. Just don't use some rag like the Gatewaypundit, who lie incessantly. If you don't substantiate claim, then your claim is vacuous, a mere opinion, and like, who the f*ck cares? How often do you see me using, Occupy Democrats, or The Wonkette?

 

any voter that should have been allowed to vote, but gets denied should automatically get 1 billion dollars automatically... that would stop States from doing this

 

I'm sorry that the concept of evidence offends you. I prefer to base my positions on evidence, not Trump's emotions.

 

Projectionism on parade.

Weasel words, rant words, to boot.

Non substantive arguments are non arguments, in my book.

Find a real argument, something you can prove or at least substantiate, Because rants are like, who the **** cares, ya know?

 

You haven't got a clue on this.

 

Jabberwocky. San Diego Union - conservative? You must have a different paperboy than me. National Review? Ever turn the from cover? They're about as anti-Trump as you are. Somehow I get the feeling you haven't actually read any of those you listed, except maybe SDUT.

 

Does basing your's on Biden's emotions feel any better?

 

void

 

When you say 'ban private voter challenges', what are you saying? Are you saying private individuals should have no ability to meaningfully investigate elections?

 

But what really gets your goat is that you know in your heart of hearts that the summation was deadly accurate.

 

IOW, "Do not ever exercise your 1st Amendment right to question an election result. All in the name of democracy!"... LMAO

 

A serious problem designed to gum up the election processing of results and creating massive chaos to determine the results.

 

This is the biggest abuse of our democracy: Using the justice departments to get rid of candidates.

 

And now even reading offends you. I said evidence. But that's rich coming from someone who supports a candidate that is so emotionally unstable that it's likely clinical.

 

Vacuous accusations are not merit worthy arguments.

A merit worthy argument, it doesn't have to be correct, but, at the minimum, it is one that one can counter with countering data, facts, better reasoning, etc., if any are available, (if not, I would concede your point) but you haven't provided any.

Arguments which do not rise about 'you are wrong' do not move the debate forward, they are attempts to kill the conversation, and, as such, are not merit worthy.

So, if you don't mind, please state your case, i.e, find a real counter argument.