There is more than enough evidence uncovered to impeach Joe Biden.

You will need other evidence in which he conveyed something outside his duties as VP. You have none. The Confidential informant on FD 1023 promised to have such a recording but still has not produced it. And he probably is bluffing here.

 

Well, I bet there is GOP State Office holder that thinks otherwise.


She thinks she gets to decide for everyone.

Bribed Joe's Open Borders

"The Public Should Be Made Aware Of This"

"Our government is funding this invasion with our tax dollars."

 

Again, no evidence of such. More emotionalism and political hubris from the internet and conservative social media.

 

So has Comer Pyle and Gym Jordan brought up the vote to impeach yet? After all, rightists firmly believe they have all the evidence they need to impeach. Let's get on with it! Do the right thing do nothing GOP!

 

My prediction is they won't until February or March of this year when the primaries are in full swing, and the most likely is after Super Tuesday.

 

I'll be shocked if they even vote on it. The R's in districts where Biden won that State by large margins will primary their asses out. LOL

 

Fake News.

'The US southern border invasion is being organized by a network of NGOs, or non-governmental organizations, some of which are funded by US taxpayers.

• "Mass Migration Blueprints" Reveal NGOs "Carefully Planned" US Migrant Invasion, Report Says
• Watch: "Guerrilla Camps" Set Up By Leftist Groups Assist Cartels In Southern Border Invasion'

You failed to notice that have little backpacks, if they have backpacks at all, and you never wondered "gee, how do they walk all the way from Guatemala, with just that little backpack? Try showing a little more intellectual curiosity next time.



Bribed Joe is clearly unfit for office, and if a single unelected Dem Puke can strip a ballot, so can an unelected GOP state official.

 

NGOs are nonprofit organizations, aka private enterprises. Some may have connections to governments, like the Peace Corps, but many of them are supported by donations from private individuals, not government entities.

Although there is no agreed-upon definition of what a NGO is, the link below explains what they are to you. The links do not list or cite any specific NGO, just an accusation again trying to link them to the Joe Biden administration, which has no proof to begin that is true.

https://www.ngosource.org/what-is-an-ngo#:~:text=NGO stands for non-governmental,all parts of the world.

 

OOOH so you want to bring up the FD-1023.... So where is the recording?

 

Nope... no other evidence needed at all.. Joe Biden does not need to receive money at all as long as the family members do by selling the Biden "brand" as Archer testified...

Joe does not have to receive money to be involved in money laundering, influence peddling and bribery.....
As been stated many times.... Joe Biden does not have to get money at all to be involved in influence peddling and bribery...as long as family members get cash or favors using the Biden "brand"

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-201/
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Third-Bank-Records-Memorandum_Redacted.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1292051/download

 

He ignored the immigration laws, but that doesn’t matter to progressives because they don’t believe in national borders unless a Republican advocates no borders. Then it’s awful until they take charge. Then it will be open borders again.

 

He is following the immigration laws as described by Congress. That includes using the advance paroles for those who are seeking humanitarian relief while still in the US, much like the Romeike family who is still here despite being "illegal" to begin with. What you don't like is you don't want "these people" here to begin with, legal or otherwise.

 

If you are going to argue that he does not need to receive the money, then you need something in writing or in verbal communication that was a quid pro quo that had nothing to do with the office when he was VP. You do know that is an exception to the legal argument, which makes your hypothesis null and void. You are just TFS to understand that.

 

Report: Trump businesses received $7.8 million in foreign payments during presidency

snip~

During Donald Trump’s presidency, his businesses received at least $7.8 million in payments from the foreign governments and officials of 20 countries, including China, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, according to a report released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

The report argues that the payments violated the Constitution’s foreign emoluments clause, a provision that bars federal officials, including the president, from accepting money or gifts from foreign governments without permission from Congress. That clause was central to a protracted legal debate when Democrats controlled the House and sought access to Trump’s financial records. The issue eventually landed at the Supreme Court, but there was no definitive ruling on whether Trump illegally profited from his presidency. Instead, the justices in 2021 said the cases were moot because Trump no longer held office.

Three years later, Trump could win a second term as president. He’s the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination and poised for a potential rematch against President Biden. Many recent polls show Biden trailing Trump in support nationally and in key battleground states.

When Republicans took control of the House in 2023, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) ended the congressional investigation into Trump’s alleged violations of the emoluments clause. He also declined to enforce a court-ordered agreement that Mazars USA, Trump’s former accounting firm, produce evidence related to Trump’s financial dealings.

Before Comer’s chairmanship, Mazars had started document production and turned over a subset of documents to Oversight Committee Democrats, led by ranking Democrat Jamie Raskin (Md.). That tranche of documents showed payments by foreign governments to three Trump properties in New York, Washington and Las Vegas. Committee investigators also identified, from public records, significant spending at a fourth Trump property, Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in New York.

“These payments were made while these governments were promoting specific foreign policy goals with the Trump Administration and even, at times, with President Trump himself, and as they were requesting specific actions from the United States to advance their own national policy objectives,” according to the 155-page report released Thursday.

Comer said in a statement Thursday that it was “beyond parody that Democrats continue their obsession with former President Trump,” and that Trump has “legitimate businesses.”

According to information available to committee investigators, China made the largest total payments — $5.5 million — to Trump’s private businesses. The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), one of China’s biggest state-owned banks, was among Trump Tower’s largest office tenants during the Trump presidency. The report notes that during Trump’s first year in the White House, several Chinese banks — including ICBC — came under scrutiny for financial ties to North Korea, causing the administration to weigh sanctions against them.

Despite calls from members of his own party to implement maximum pressure against these banks to halt the North Korean nuclear program, “then-President Trump and his Administration did not take any formal action against Trump Tower tenant ICBC,” the report concludes.
​

This report clearly shows the hypocrisy of Comer's investigation into Biden. Political theater at its finest!

​

 

The Democrats have yet to show evidence Trump received over 7 million from foreign countries.

 

Not at all ... Comer has shown the Biden family received money from foreign countries through empty shell companies.... Joe Biden was the "brand"

Joe does not have to receive money to be involved in money laundering, influence peddling and bribery.....
As been stated many times.... Joe Biden does not have to get money at all to be involved in influence peddling and bribery...as long as family members get cash or favors using the Biden "brand"

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-201/
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Third-Bank-Records-Memorandum_Redacted.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1292051/download

 

Are you running away from your FD-1023 comment? Tell us about this FD-1023.

 

Here is the memo
Comer Reveals New Evidence in Biden Family’s Influence Peddling Schemes
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-new-evidence-in-biden-familys-influence-peddling-schemes/
first memo
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Bank-Records-Memo-3.16.23.pdf

second memo 36 page
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Bank-Memorandum-5.10.23.pdf

Gabriel Popoviciu is in the spot light.... so lets see who he is. The Romanian transactions show evidence of influence peddling and a correlation between Biden family and their business associates’ work and then Vice President Biden’s responsibilities while in office. Prior to the wire from State Energy HK, Rob Walker, James Gilliar, Hunter Biden, and Hallie Biden received payments from a Romanian source, and many of the payments were made while Joe Biden was Vice President and working directly on the United States’ official policy in Romania.

This is an example of the reasonable suspicion "evidence" they uncovered that should have had the DOJ all over it

 

Interesting... What did daddy Joe Biden know and when did he know it... Where is the DOJ investigations?
who is this Popoviciu’s Bladon Enterprises character that was convicted of bribery Comer is talking about?

 

Weird how you missed this.

"According to an August report by progressive left-leaning media watchdog organization Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, President Biden's Department of Homeland Security allocated $363 million to NGOs to assist illegal aliens once in the US."

Your reading comprehension seems to go out right when you get to a point that refutes your narrative.

 

Hunter Biden served on the board of the Truman Project’s Center for National Policy alongside Blue Star Strategies principal Sally Painter, with whom he would work to end Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin’s investigation into Burisma later the same year that he secured his father’s speaking role for the organization.
FOIA production shows Hunter Biden's efforts to secure benefits (aka influence peddling) for a organization for which he was a board member. It shows
Hunter Biden influence peddling for foreign policy organization. in 2015 Hunter Biden lobbied for his father, the then-vice president, to be the featured speaker at the Truman National Security Project’s conference, while the younger Biden served as a board member at the organization.
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-01/Production-11-hotdoc-1-Truman-Project-invite.pdf
https://justthenews.com/accountabil...nfluence-peddling-foreign-policy-organization

"Chung, Kathy" Kathy_S_Chung@ovp.eop.gov was VP Joe's secretary..

 

Human trafficking anyone?

On June 27, 2022, the Washington Examiner reported that Joe Biden may have unwittingly financed Hunter Biden’s “participation in an escort ring tied to Russia.” According to the article, on January 2, 2019, Hunter Biden exchanged text messages with “Eva,” short for “Moreva,” who served as the go-between for the reported escorts. The article noted that Joe Biden committed to wiring Hunter Biden approximately $100,000 from December 2018 through January 2019. The Washington Examiner revealed that Hunter Biden spent approximately $30,000 on escorts between November 2018 and March 2019. According to the report, evidence of the spending is based on Wells Fargo wire receipts, Zelle receipts, PayPal notices and pictures of cashier checks. ........

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/hunter-bidens-payments-joe-biden-escorts-laptop

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/new...inal-behavior-must-be-thoroughly-investigated

https://bidenreport.com/#p=349

 

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), today revealed new details about the scale of criminal information provided to the FBI about the Biden family and the efforts some FBI officials took to sideline key information and sources, some of whom had been vetted by multiple Justice Department offices.

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/grassley_to_justice_deptfbi1023followup.pdf

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/new...with-far-reaching-biden-family-investigations

 

Comer has not shown **** Popscott. He has made numerous allegations, but nothing he has is actual proof. Even the attorneys that Comer and Jordan have invited stated "There is not enough evidence to substantiate your claim." That was Derserwitz, Turley, and a couple of others in their testimony to the committee. Now, if they saw more evidence, then they would reconsider and suggest that they try to obtain more evidence.

 

Off your specific point but kinda related regardless....
I don't see Dersh coming back in any capacity testimony-wise. He apparently did "take off his underwear" re some of the newly released Epstein docs.