Those anti-establishment pundits who support the official story

Discussion in '9/11' started by Scott, Sep 22, 2017.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,227
    Likes Received:
    1,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    with all those repeated ad obnoxious nonresponsive/speculative posts Im expected to acknowledge its going to be a long thread

    They dont have anything folks, thats the problem, so as you can see they push naked opinion disinfo and push it hard
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2023
  2. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,386
    Likes Received:
    712
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2023
  3. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,386
    Likes Received:
    712
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This got rolled off the current page without a response. Viewers will also wonder what are the odds that "AE911" and their "quest for the truth" results in them commissioning a report from an expert in bridge building, then subsequently receiving a report that suggests it wasn't fire. Especially damning is that the report models 2 floors for fire, when 10 were on fire for many hours, unfought by any fire department! In addition, Hulsey arm waves away a report by Weidlinger that uses completely purpose build fire-modeling software, by suggesting some nonsense about it getting too hot when the quoted temperatures fall easily within normal building fire ranges.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2023

Share This Page