What I'm thinking about here is what to do with those really closed-minded people who refuse to even look at the proof. If you can get them to "Humor" you by looking at something you want to show them, it should be something that's so clear that it jumps right out at them. That might get their attention and cause them to be more objective about the stuff you're talking about. Do you have time to watch this from the 1:55:30 time mark to the 2:19:35 time mark? The New Pearl Harbor ~ full Can you find twenty five minutes in your schedule? You can watch it a piece at a time.
I'm so sorry to hear you're a mentally ill truther. Perhaps you should seek help. But I guess that's still better than being a mentally ill liar. So I take it because of your diminished intellectual capacity you won't be able to spend about 25 minutes watching a video. Too bad, it does contain some eye opening FACTS.
you're the one that needs help Bobby ... I'm guessing paranoid schizophrenia ... and of the many videos posted in this thread, which one has the eye opening facts? ... it's hard to keep up with the troofer nonsense ...
And thank you for repeatedly demonstrating the cognitive dissonance of the minority that still believes the official story.
At the 30:45 time mark of this video you can see a case of someone at the top using his power to make a famous person do something he didn't want to do. Sammy Davis Jr - The Kid in the Middle . Documentary Check it out at the 50:48 time mark. Sammy Davis Jr. endorsed Richard Nixon. It does seem kind of strange. He might have been sincere but I wonder if some goons paid him a visit and made him an offer he couldn't refuse.
Here are some of the videos from page #1 that don't work any more. I couldn't find the first one. The Curious Case of Philip Marshall https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=The+Curious+Case+of+Philip+Marshall&&view=detail&mid=F167D64BFCBE8D908B2BF167D64BFCBE8D908B2B&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=/videos/search?q=The%20Curious%20Case%20of%20Philip%20Marshall&qs=n&form=QBVR&sp=-1&pq=the%20curious%20case%20of%20philip%20marshall&sc=0-35&sk=&cvid=34A000A7411B47889A5C6BE6C086A70E Alfred Schaefer 2014 “The Gatekeepers of 9/11“ HD https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=9/11+Gatekeepers+and+Controlled+Opposition&&view=detail&mid=E209E2C100882F34F16FE209E2C100882F34F16F&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=/videos/search?q=9%2f11+Gatekeepers+and+Controlled+Opposition&FORM=HDRSC3 The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers: Zwicker (#3 https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=the+shame+of+noam+chomsky&&view=detail&mid=82BAE3AF98B7CB95721582BAE3AF98B7CB957215&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=/videos/search?q=the+shame+of+noam+chomsky&FORM=HDRSC3 PART 5: Legislators,Pundits & 9/11 Controlled Demolition Questions https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...1+Controlled+Demolition+Questions&FORM=HDRSC3 9 11 Building 7 Exposed on Mainstream Media C Span, Aug 2014 Big Step!!! https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=9/11+Building+7+Exposed+on+Mainstream+Media+(C-Span,+Aug+2014):+Big+Step!!!&&view=detail&mid=40572A1441667C6FB16E40572A1441667C6FB16E&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=/videos/search?q=9%2f11+Building+7+Exposed+on+Mainstream+Media+(C-Span%2c+Aug+2014)%3a+Big+Step!!!&FORM=HDRSC3
The link to this video in the above post doesn't work any more so here's a new one. The Curious Case of Philip Marshall https://rumble.com/v34hfi-the-curious-case-of-philip-marshall.html
I just came across this. Why Chomsky Is Wrong About 9/11 https://www.bing.com/search?q="Why+Chomsky+Is+Wrong+About+9/11"&FORM=HDRSC1 https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/why-chomsky-is-wrong-about-9-11/ Be sure to watch the entire question-and-answer period that begins at the 49:00 time mark. The sound isn't too clear at the beginning but it gets better. Click on the rectangular icon on the lower right to activate the subtitles. It helps a little. Someone asked him how these anti-establishment pundits are controlled. He thinks that they're not just threatened. They also receive some hush money.
÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ psikeyhackr 23h ago Now we have the eternal physics problem. Analyze the straight down collapse of a 1360 ft skyscraper without even asking about the distribution of steel and the distribution of concrete down the structure? Is this a joke? Why is the Eiffel Tower shaped like that? It is called exponential. (Thumbs Up) 4 ============================== Christine Quinn 1 hour ago Well said. I am a licensed Architect who was working at a University in Maryland when this happened. I also had many EXPERIENCED structural and civil engineer friends. Together we had been involved in observing several CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS of high rise buildings. We all knew that this ”straight down collapse" could not have occurred as we were being told. We also knew that WAFER THIN aluminum airplane wings could not cut through steel reinforced concrete they would have immediately sheared off. After voicing my professional opinions for several weeks I was eventually FORMALLY told by University officials to stop, and basically TOE THE PARTY LINE. That was a very disturbing experience, and I'm sure MANY other architects and engineers throughout the United States were given the same instructions. ============================ Thomas Truong 10h ago @christine Quinn You're not alone, ma'am. Thank you for sharing your experience with us. I've read that Anthony Shaffer (ret Lt-Col) made himself some powerful foes in the intelligence circle and eventually stripped of his access clearance, for providing some info which became acceptable to the 9/11 Commission's official findings. He later co-authored a book, which was also censored (1 st edition entirely bought then destroyed by the Dept of Defense). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Shaffer_(intelligence_officer) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dark_Heart ============================== Christine Jillian Quinn AIA Campus Architect at University of Maryland at Baltimore University of Maryland at Baltimore The Johns Hopkins University ================================ Christine Jillian Quinn Architect Christine Jillian Quinn, Bath, ME holds a Architects license according to the Maryland license board. Their BuildZoom score of 90 indicates that they are licensed or registered but we do not have additional information about them.
I don't believe the official 9/11 narrative for numerous reasons but I've given up trying to change the minds of people who are determined to believe the physically impossible. The spontaneous implosion of Building #7 should cause even the most gullible of individuals to scratch their head. I believe that the solution to this particular crime can be found simply by using the ancient adage: cui bono
I mostly stopped caring who did it long ago. This has been a national, if not global, failure to resolve a physics problem that middle school children should understand. School kids taught obvious nonsense for a couple of decades. Putin should get a bunch of engineers and architects together and have them analyze and explain the impossibility of the North Tower collapse. Professional engineers should be able to create reasonable estimates of steel distribution. No matter how the Ukraine turns out the US government would have an eternal black eye. 20 years has been far too long. This is a cultural psychological issue now. People have believed nonsense since they were 4 years old because their parents could not figure out an idiotic lie. How do I e-mail Putin?
I'm afraid that I don't have Mr. Putin's E mail address on my antique Roladex at the moment but suspect that you can communicate your sentiments via the Russian embassy. I wonder when the truth will ever come out? Thanks,
I agree completely. It is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled. As Mark Twain wisely noted, The Truth has no defense against a fool determined to believe a lie. I just found that Twain quip last week. It describes so many friends of mine about certain current events, including 911 for 20 years.
The impossibility of the "collapse" of the 3 towers on 9/11 has already been scientifically proven without the shadow of any doubt by science, logic and common sense in meticulous detail via multiple credible studies. If over 3,600 (mostly American) architects and engineers are not taken seriously by the establishment (the US government, their lapdogs and the MSM) why would you expect Putin and his engineers to be taken seriously? The establishment has the audacity to ignore fact and especially science and label over 3,600 architects and engineers "conspiracy theorists".
Bob As long as we're in the CT section, have you noticed the recent MSM stories about a 5th airplane on 911? I've noticed it in 2 different places in the last few days. My theory is that they're floating this story to support the official narrative 20+ years later, as there seems to be a general awakening in the public to the fact that their government lies all the time. As I've read the story, they're claiming an airliner, I think a United flight, found suspicious things inside the airplane including box cutters. It's comical to me. And regarding Russia's input, I've long suspected that because they have similar surveillance satellites to ours that can detect nuclear detonations, they have data showing such detonations at WTC on 911.
Box cutters were placed in the first-class seat pockets of the plane parked next to United 23, and United 23’s pilot reportedly believes they were intended for his plane but were placed on the other aircraft by mistake, according to TMZ. Box cutters, what a bunch of horse caca. Maybe it was box cutters that took down the 3 towers on 9/11.
I have met Richard Gage and confronted him about the steel distribution. He and his organization has said nothing about it. Why is the Eiffel Tower shaped like that?