Troughers support NIST who has no evidence for the wtc7 report

Just belches and beer farts!

“NIST claims their computer model can account for the observed phenomena, so let’s look at NIST’s model – except we can’t.


Yep top secret model!

How about troughers lets see that EVIDENCE used for their model!

Post it!

 

You claim a 'top secret' model, then link to that selfsame model.

Silly 'truther'.

 

yeh that means it cannot be examined by the public

here try this before you respond next time

[h=3]Common English Words - Macmillan Dictionary[/h]

 

Silly 'truther'. Hint: If you can link to it (and you did) then it isn't so 'top secret', is it?

 

silly trougher

models require data

data is obtained from evidence in fact

provide the data and the evidence in fact that the data was was obtained from.

that site has no model data or evidence in NISTS defense

 

waste of a thread. Koko admitted he never even read the NIST reports. Fail OP. Go back to your no planer thread.

 

You are moving the goalposts, Jojo. You said the model was top secret. Admit you were wrong and we'll progress to your next incorrect statement.

 

Well you know kokos credo,'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance,baffle them with bull****

 

http://razor.occams.info/nist-wtc/

There you go.

 

Thread does not meet guidelines for thread creation. Please refer to the forum rules

Shangrila
Site Moderator