Trump Admin Inflated Iran Intel, U.S. Officials Say

alexa · May 21, 2019

This is an interesting interview on the subject of this thread. In it Pompeo is described as more interested in Rapture than Diplomacy and it talks about how the US is being seen as 'berserk' by the rest of the world. Not just some. Not just the US's traditional enemies but the world.

Josephwalker · May 21, 2019

alexa said: ↑

Oh please you gave one of Iran when threatened, threatening Israel like boxers do before a fight and went back to the old Ahmadinejad one which as you have been told by Truth and Justice has been debunked more often than said. Ahmadinejad is known as the Iranian Trump. You a Trump supporter? We are talking about Iran and nukes. Iran has never said it is going to nuke Israel or anyone else. Indeed what it has said is that the idea of using nukes is against Islam, though when threatened with its life in the Iran/Iraq war it did engage in things which were.

I provided you with well known serious calls to nuke Iran. I did though give you the wrong Adelson link for some reason. There are plenty of reports and youtubes of Trumps strongest Donor demanding Iran be nuked. Here is one https://www.timesofisrael.com/sheldon-adelson-calls-on-us-to-nuke-iranian-desert/ Now that is a genuine call from a man who holds the purse strings for the President of the United States to get re elected in 2020 and with Bolton and Pompeo desperate to destroy Iran, much more serious than someone mouthing off.

The second link I gave you was the answer to the terror which the country of Iran arouses in those with unusually strong fear antennas.

An Iranian-hosted international disarmament conference concluded Sunday with a demand that Israel join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to assure a nuclear weapons-free Middle East.

I then gave you a link to a New York Times article which says that Israel already has 200 nukes pointed at Iran. Now that is much stronger evidence of the desire to destroy Iran than someone mouthing off when threatened.

Both of these showed you, you were looking in the wrong place for the solution.

Finally I linked to an article on Israel talking about a pre emptive nuclear strike on Iran. That is what I remember being talked about prior to the new deal, which Iran is still keeping, and which you want her destroyed for so doing. She may be letting go of some of the things she voluntarily agreed too and may let go gradually of that deal. Trump and his friends have virtually made her.

Now two countries not getting on. We want to have peace. Which country would you attack if you were stupid enough to believe attack causes peace. Clearly you would attack the one being the most belligerent. My posts proved that is Israel. Like I said you refuse to see what you do not want to and in that you are somewhat disingenuous.
Click to expand...

Obviously you don't know the difference between "debunked" and "walked back." No official Iran statement calling for the annihilation of Israel has been debunked, they have all been walked back as the statements got out into the general public and faced condemnation world wide.
As for Israel threats they have all been defensive in nature countering the threats made against them.

Josephwalker · May 21, 2019

Mandelus said: ↑

And? So what?

The US in turn gives Israel a wildcard to do the worst things ... things that they would not allow to any other country in the world! And then all wrapped up nicely with the phrase that the Isrelis fight back against terrorism ... even though most things have nothing to do with terrorism.
ISrael has the most powerful armed forces in the ME, nuclear armed ... basically patrolling an atomically armed, Israeli submarine in firing distance to Iran to carry out a devastating second strike ... that Israel still does not allow an inspector to access its nuclear facilities. .. all that is unimportant.
And who criticizes all this, of course, is anti-Semitic .... ROFL!

Iran has been propagating the destruction of Israel for 40 years ... and everyone knows that they are not capable of doing so. And in order to prevent possible nuclear armament, the deal is concluded, which was about nothing more than the nuclear armament, because only this is important. But no ... Donald fool at White House ends the deal with lies and false claims ...

We remember his first security adviser, Michael T. Flynn? Already had a ready attack plan against Iran in the drawer at that time! That says all.... and reminds to Bush Jr. who still in election campaign told that Saddam must be eleminated by war!
Click to expand...

A response that starts out with "so what" means you have conceded the debate.

alexa · May 21, 2019

This is hilarious. I have just been listening to Trump blame John Kerry for the situation with Iran. He claims Iran is listening to John Kerry who is phoning him all the time and telling him to ignore Trump.

Log in or Sign up

Trump Admin Inflated Iran Intel, U.S. Officials Say

alexa Well-Known Member Past Donor

Josephwalker Banned

Josephwalker Banned

alexa Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Trump Admin Inflated Iran Intel, U.S. Officials Say

alexa Well-Known Member Past Donor

Josephwalker Banned

Josephwalker Banned

alexa Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches