Trump gets another new campaign manager

It is also a bestseller at the airport ---- in Kuwait....

 

Again, you go right and ahead and try to use hearsay information, the Dems will hammer Trump by his ACTUAL comments and blowups on video. Good luck, the only ones you are convincing are those that wouldn't vote for Hillary to begin with. A picture (or video) is worth more than hearsay on a page.

 

Kind of like Japan, but with more sand, oil and date palms.

 

Most people believe first person accounts - if there are enough of them. And Clinton's temper fits are no secret. The denials only degrade the credibility of her defenders.

Then there is Clinton's spiritualism. Do you believe she really channeled Eleanore Roosevelt while in a trance?
More important - do you think she believes she did?

 

Usually I don'this quote myself, but my other 5,251.26 personalities are demanding it: And lo and behold, it came to be that Mr. Ukrainian-Trumpie-Hatchet-Man did thusly take his bow and leave the stage.... to get in a paddywagon and head straight for jail....

 

Compared to ACTUAL video and sound bytes of Trump. Good luck, you'll need it.

Wait a minute, you are seriously knocking Hilary when the majority of conservatives believe in talking burning bushes, Noah's ark holding all animals two by two, Eve being made from Adam's rib bone, Moses parting the red sea, and Jesus rising from the dead? You might want to get off your soapbox there.

I don't care what Hillary believes spiritual wise as long as she isn't forcing her religion onto me and forcing me to follow it.

 

IOW, you are blinded by your own partisan extremism.

OTH, I do not find blind support for Trump. Likely Trump voters here do not deny his faults.

 

I am thinking of Dr. Ben Carson now.... and and about Pyramids and grain storage and all sorts of cool stuff.... and LAUGHING.

- - - Updated - - -

BEST FRIGGIN POSTING OF THE DAY!!!!

 

Thank you for conceding that this is nothing more than someone trying to make money by selling fictional accounts of the Clintons to the gullible FauxNoise viewers.

And FTR here is a review of his book by his peers who don't believe he would have had the kind of access he alleges.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/gary-...inton-crisis-of-character-unfit-donald-trump/

What a whackjob!

 

Sure you blindly follow Trump, you excuse his ACTUAL lies and video taped blowups and then try to tell us to take hearsay information as Gospel against Hillary. Sorry son, your partisan hackery has been exposed.

 

They're trying to polish that orange turd really hard. Too late, everyone knows what kind of a fool trump is.

 

The corruption and abusive behavior of the Clinton's has been confirmed by too many independent source over the decades.

Your partisan defense has no credibility now. Slandering every critic and victim has grown very old and obvious.

BRYNE: She doesn't have the temperament. She didn't have the temperament to handle the social office when she was first lady. She does not have the temperament.

HANNITY: She's dishonest.

BRYNE: She's dishonest. She habitually lies. Anybody that, you know, can separate themselves from their politics and review her behavior over the last --


"HANNITY: You're going to be accused of this being political.

BRYNE: I absolutely I'm sure I will be. I have been already.

HANNITY: And what's your answer?

BRYNE: It's not. It's got nothing to do with politics.

HANNITY: Is it a love of country?

BRYNE: It is a love of country, and I hope someday that it does make a difference. I mean, if Mrs. Clinton ends up being the president of the United States, then she's our president and she's the commander-in-chief, and it is what it is. But if she did become the president without me speaking the truth, I'm not sure I could deal with that. People need to know. This is serious, and her behavior is appalling. And she's two different people."

http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2...-calls-hillary-clinton-dictator-details-bill/

I will buy his book , so should you . We both know the Byrne is far more credible than the Clintons and their mouth pieces. How could he not be?

 

So instead you're supporting Donald? A who is described as "utterly amoral," a "pathological liar" "fraudster," “narcissist" "phony" "dangerous national security risk" "con man" "national embarrassment" who is "wholly unprepared to be president?" That is by leading conservatives and Republicans.

Could I interest you in a diploma from Trump U for only $40,000?

You don't have a leg to stand on to criticize Clinton when you support a con man like Donald.

 

Clinton is a corrupt unstable liar. Everyone has known that for decades. Even her defenders have admitted the now obvious ugly truth about Clinton.

“Hillary willfully put herself above the rules — again — and a president, campaign and party are all left twisting themselves into pretzels defending her.

Obama aimed to have no shadows, but the Clintons operate in shadows.
After Bill Clinton crossed the tarmac in Phoenix to have a long chat with Lynch, the attorney general confessed that the ill-advised meeting had “cast a shadow” over her department’s investigation into his wife and that she would feel constrained to follow the recommendation of the F.B.I.

“I certainly wouldn’t do it again,” Lynch said, admitting it hit her “painfully” that she had made a mistake dancing with the Arkansas devil in the pale moonlight. The meeting seemed even more suspect a week later, when The Times reported that Hillary might let Lynch stay on in a new Clinton administration.” NYT, Maureen Dowd, 7/6/16.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/10/opinion/sunday/the-clinton-contamination.html?_r=0

 

I do not support Trump. I would vote for him over Clinton. The evidence that Clinton is an "utterly amoral," a "pathological liar" "fraudster," “narcissist" "phony" "dangerous national security risk" "con man" "national embarrassment" who is "wholly unprepared to be president" is overwhelming.

Even her friends have had to denounce her on the record to protect their credibility.

“But what should disturb Obama, who bypassed his own vice president to lay out the red carpet for Hillary, is that the email transgression is not a one off. It’s part of a long pattern of ethical slipping and sliding, obsessive secrecy and paranoia, and collateral damage.

Comey’s verdict that Hillary was “negligent” was met with sighs rather than shock. We know who Hillary and Bill are now. We’ve been held hostage to their predilections and braided intrigues for a long time. (On the Hill, Comey refused to confirm or deny that he’s investigating the Clinton Foundation, with its unseemly tangle of donors and people doing business with State.)

We’re resigned to the Clintons focusing on their viability and disregarding the consequences of their heedless actions on others. They’re always offering a Faustian deal. This year’s election bargain: Put up with our iniquities or get Trump’s short fingers on the nuclear button.

The Clintons work hard but don’t play by the rules. Imagine them in the White House with the benefit of low expectations.” NYT, Maureen Dowd, 7/6/16.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/10/opinion/sunday/the-clinton-contamination.html?_r=0

Trump is just a rather ruthless successful businessman. He can be obnoxious and aggressive. The rest of the frivolous attacks on him are just typical partisan political slander.

 

Quoting discredited partisans like Hannity and Byrne is not doing your own credibility any favors.

In essence you are relying upon uncorroborated and unverified hearsay.

That only the gullible believe such drivel is not my problem.

 

Partisans are not discredited. They are partisan. Byrne has not been discredited, evreything he says about Clinton has been corroborated by many witnesses for decades now.

“Hillary told secret service agent who refused to carry her bag to ‘get the f*** away from me’, and treated her detail like hired help but Bill was a softie . . . says former agent in bombshell book” Caroline Howe, The Daily Mail, 6/11/2014.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...anage-says-former-agent-bombshell-expose.html

 

If you view RW propaganda as evidence.

Dowd is a Clinton "friend"? Let me guess, this is another "fact" of yours from RW propaganda, right?

Dowd has been bashing the Clintons since 1993. She's not friend.

Sorry. It's leading conservatives who described Donald as "utterly amoral," a "pathological liar" "fraudster," “narcissist" "phony" "dangerous national security risk" "con man" "national embarrassment" who is "wholly unprepared to be president?"

 

Do you dismiss the National Review, The Standard, The WSJ... as RW propaganda?

The only close friends of the Clintons have paid the Clintons at least half a million dollars - there are a lot of them. Dowd has often told the some of the truth about the Clintons - she has also supported them - reliably, In fact her last column did just that.

Do you really believe that the NYT is a RW source?

“Mr. Comey’s conclusions — legal recommendation aside — can be seen as nothing less than a censure of Mrs. Clinton’s judgment.”

“But she has done damage to her reputation by failing to conform to the established security policies of the department she ran and by giving evasive or misleading answers about her actions and motivations. If there was ever a time that Mrs. Clinton needed to demonstrate that she understands the forthrightness demanded of those who hold the nation’s highest office, this is that moment.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/opinion/legal-but-not-political-clarity-on-the-clinton-emails.html

 

Here is how leading Republicans and conservatives describe Donald: "utterly amoral," "pathological liar," "fraudster," “narcissist," "phony," "dangerous national security risk," "con man," "national embarrassment," who is "wholly unprepared to be president."

You have no standing to criticize Clinton's qualifications when you support the "con man" Don.

 

LOL! Then you admit that the RW is in opposition to Trump! Your tying yourself into knot to avoid admitting that the Clintons are nothing more than a corrupt political dynasty that no American should ever vote for.

 

Thanks for sharing your opinions.

Many of the RW are in opposition to Donald.

Because, as they describe him, "utterly amoral," "pathological liar," "fraudster," “narcissist," "phony," "dangerous national security risk," "con man," "national embarrassment," who is "wholly unprepared to be president."

 

You just don't get it. The RW and LW elites in the US are part of the same political establishment. They are in the same bed.

Terry McAuliffe and Haley Barbour = the beast with 2 heads.