Trump just boxed himself in with the Stormy Daniels case

I know a lot about that. It happened to Bill Clinton and i watched the event unfold on TV. Not merely on news, but on CSPAN.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?112742-1/impeachment-inquiry-authorization-hearing-1

 

You mean to tell me there wouldn't be a majority vote by Republicans for obstruction of justice to impeach? Wow! So the entire party is corrupt. Who would have ever guessed? Unprincipled and lawless!

 

And? Are you trying to tell me obstruction of justice to an investigation by a foreign adversary who hijacked our election with a president who has his own enrichment motives in mind, is not a big deal for impeachment?

 

Want a history lesson? Well if not, too bad.

Nazis conducted those murders in top secret. They wanted to hide this from the German citizens so did most of it in Poland and other events such as executions elsewhere were not widely exposed.

It has nothing at all to do with Christians. Hitler to my knowledge went to church at times as a child. Past that it is doubtful he went again. Hither was not following teachings of the Bible. Muslims in their teachings teach to kill infidels. And Atheists qualify.

 

Silly fool logic. Even if it were true, Trumps election is no where near as illegal as Obamas.

WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign has been fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission......
The fines are among the largest ever levied on a presidential campaign by the FEC and stem from a series of missing filings for nearly 1,300 contributions totaling nearly $1.8 million.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2013/...st-fines-ever-levied-on-presidential-campaign

 

Neither do you, because you provided no proof. Try again!

 

Something like that could be grounds. When do you expect Mueller to bring up charges on anybody matching what you just said?

The election was not hijacked. Obama promised us all this is not possible.

Notice what Obama declared is his duty at the time.

 

I will alert you when you say something remotely true.

 

OMG! What a ridiculous montage of nothing. To compare a campaign violation of Obama's that represented a timing thing to report, to go along with 3 million contributors, versus a pre-meditated campaign finance contribution involving hush money with a porn star is just flat out laughable. Boss, you and the apologists are just too desperate to find something that always lands into the lap of nothing.

 

Trump matches the description and the charges have already been viewed. It's just a matter of filing those charges; http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...n-takes-shape-ahead-of-schedule-1209836611594. Unless he tries to fire Mueller before? But wait, team Trump said they were cooperating in the Mueller investigation. Lol!

Obama didn't have the evidence then, like we have today.

Totally irrelevant, now that the evidence is in.

 

Changing the narrative to me, doesn't help you prove anything. It just exposes you as the bull ...... who can't back up what you say.

 

Funny but you did it to me.

 

Still having trouble proving your point. lol! I get it. You are at the end of the line.

 

You are all wagging your tails and breathing with your tongues out praying Mueller happens on something to do with Trump. It looks bad for Muller since he is now after a lawyer.

 

No, when you tell the truth, I shall alert you.

 

Carry on! You have nothing intelligent to debate because you have nothing to prove.

 

"Looks bad for Mueller"? More coded language that says absolutely nothing. Boss, can you debate something of value instead of this rambling garbage you keep peddling?

 

Truth alert with modification. I have no intelligent person discussing this with me. Nothing to prove due to it being done for me.

 

It does look bad for Mueller. I said over and over, he went fishing for a huge Tuna but caught a sardine or two.

 

Good! Now that we got you out of the way.

 

The vital mission of the Trump Justice Department Special Counsel to confront the scheme by a hostile foreign power to promote Trump could also save America from Trumpery as a tangential benefit, but that is not the central concern. Securing the integrity of our democratic institutions is the essential focus.

It's true that most Americans consistently concur that Trump stinks, of course:

http://pollingreport.com/trump_fav.htm

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

But, while he is being hysterical over what may be exposed by US law enforcement, it is not the general loathing for him that is of existential import.

It is the evidence that is revealed.

That seems to cause him much anxiety, as if he knows the truth is not exculpatory for him -

And for him, it is all about him.

 

You completely missed what I said.
67 senate votes to remove. Not going to happen.

And, of course, if the Dems were honest, they'd remember their words from 1998, where they argued up and down that obstruction is not an impeachable offense.

 

I got what you said, and I repeat what I said. Has the Republican party decided to make this about Trump, or make it about their own parties improprieties? It seems the latter would be the one you wouldn't want to sacrifice by supporting a known mafia criminal?

 

A simple majority doesn't remove the President - so no, you didn't.
And since the Dems do not believe obstruction is an impeachable offense, Trump really has nothing to worry about.

 

Yeah, right..the citizens had no idea.. you should take a trip to the HolocaustMuseum where the Jews talk about how as they were dragged out their apts , their neighbors were going up to loot them. Where did they think the millions of Jews were? On a remote beach?
Look up kristallnacht and see how the fine Christians destroyed the Jewish stores. These were Christians .... do you think all those guards suddenly stopped believing iIn Jesus? its funny how people will condemn all Muslims but make excuses for Christians, for the record, I think most Christians are good people, as are most Muslims just trying to show all people are capable of horrendous acts